• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscription Info
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Previous Issues
    • Submit Your Work
    • Subscribe/Donate

conservation

“Where does it all go?” Part 2: Trash

August 4, 2022

(Editor’s note: this story was updated on August 8, 2022.)

By Alice Waugh

Before there was a transfer station and before most people had heard of recycling, Lincolnites either burned their garbage in their back yard or brought it to the landfill, a.k.a. the town dump. The grassy hill with white gas vent pipes on your right as you enter the transfer station is all you can see of Lincoln’s landfill since it was closed in 1986 and capped in 1990. 


Also in this series:

  • Part 5: The 5 R’s, and some numbers
  • Part 4: Recycling beyond the transfer station
  • Part 3: Recycling beyond single-stream
  • Part 1: Single-stream recycling

The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) introduced its first bans on landfilling and combustion of easy-to-recycle and toxic materials in 1990. More waste bans have been added over time, so there’s now a growing list of things that aren’t allowed in municipal solid waste (MSW), otherwise known as trash.

Lincoln’s transfer station has two trash dropoff containers: the compactor next to the singe-stream recycling bin, and the one across from the new swap shed where you can toss larger items directly from your vehicle. That container used to be called the “commercial hopper,” DPW Office Manager Susan Donaldson said. The town no longer accepts commercial or construction waste; now everything in there goes to the same place as the regular trash.

There are some changes on the horizon for trash at the transfer station. The DPW is awaiting delivery of the new compactor and hopes to have it installed by the end of the summer. 

Also, the so-called commercial hopper will be locked all the time, so residents will have to ask an attendant to open it when they want to drop items inside. “You’re not going to be able to back up and throw anything and everything into it any more,” Donaldson said. That move is an attempt to reduce trash “contamination” — meaning prohibited items that were thrown into the trash and should be recycled or disposed of in some other manner instead. 

This is actually a bigger problem than the reverse (too many nonrecyclable items contaminating the recycling bins). The town has been getting warnings from WM (Waste Management), which picks up the transfer station’s trash and takes it to a waste-to-energy (WTE) facility operated by Wheelabrator in North Andover, one of seven in the state. Companies can refuse to accept MSW loads that contain more than 30% contaminants — meaning not food or chemicals, but rather items that aren’t allowed in the trash any more. 

Because the trash from Lincoln’s two current containers are brought in separately, it’s been easy to see that most of Lincoln’s trash contamination is coming from the gated container rather than the trash compactor next to the single-stream recycling bin. Lincoln was also fined about a year ago after someone threw tires in that bin. Tires are not accepted any place at the transfer station and must be recycled by a service station.

So what happens to the trash?

When the trash is burned in Wheelabrator’s WTE facility, it yields electricity and heat but also some air pollution in the form of toxic chemicals. The federal government requires advanced pollution control equipment such as scrubber systems that reduce but not eliminate emissions. Each WTE facility in Massachusetts has to submit an emissions control plan as well as a report on the composition of the trash it takes in (click here for the facility’s latest report).

Residential waste by category that was processed by Wheelabrator in North Andover in 2019. (Source: “Wheelabrator North Andover, Inc. 2019 Waste Characterization Study Report in Support of Class II Recycling Program,” page 17.)

In 2019 (the last year for which a report is available), the largest category of trash at Wheelabrator in North Andover was organic material, which includes food waste, branches, stumps, smaller yard waste, and manure. Because of its relatively high moisture content, food waste takes more energy to burn than it yields, and it’s also one of the heavier components of household waste, which is a financial issue since the town pays by the ton for trash hauling. However, the transfer station has accepted compostable material since 2019.

Anywhere from 10-25% of incinerated trash winds up as solid bottom ash. Wheelabrator takes it to the Peabody Monofill Associates Ash Landfill, which accepts ash from several waste-to-energy facilities in the northeast United States. (Researchers are also investigating ways of extracting metals and minerals from bottom ash, or using it in making concrete or as a road base.)

As of 2020, Peabody was one of only 19 landfills still in operation in Massachusetts; another 942 MSW landfills and dumping grounds have been closed over the years, and most are or will be capped, or covered to minimize the percolation of stormwater through the buried trash and into groundwater and wetlands. 

Though there are a lot fewer landfills nationwide than there once were, they still emit carbon dioxide and methane, a potent greenhouse gas. Landfills accounted for about 15% of methane emissions in the U.S. in 2020, according to the Environmental Protection Agency, which notes that methane emissions from landfills that year were roughly equivalent to the greenhouse gas emissions from about 20.3 million passenger vehicles driven for one year. As of 2022, there were 13 landfills in the state that are current or potential candidates for the EPA’s Landfill Methane Outreach Program that aims to harvest landfill gas for energy, but Lincoln’s is not one of them.

Not allowed in Massachusetts trash:
  • Asphalt pavement, brick and concrete
  • Cathode ray tubes
  • Clean gypsum wallboard
  • Commercial food material (lower threshold effective November 1, 2022)
  • Ferrous and non-ferrous metals
  • Glass and metal containers
  • Lead acid batteries
  • Leaves and yard waste
  • Mattresses (effective November 1, 2022)
  • Recyclable paper, cardboard, and paperboard
  • Single-resin narrow-necked plastic containers (click here to see what becomes of Lincoln’s recycled plastics)
  • Textiles (effective November 1, 2022)
  • Treated and untreated wood and wood waste (banned from landfills only)
  • White goods (large appliances)
  • Whole tires (banned from landfills only; shredded tires acceptable)

Coming soon: Articles about what happens to these other recyclables — and what to do about stuff that the transfer station doesn’t accept.

Category: conservation 3 Comments

“Where does it all go?” Part 1: Single-stream recycling

August 3, 2022

By Alice Waugh

Lincolnites are pretty conscientious about trying to recycle, but contamination is a problem here and everywhere else. Through carelessness or misunderstanding, people sometimes throw things that ought to be recycled into the trash, and throw trash into their recycling bin. In this series of articles, the Lincoln Squirrel will look at what happens to everything that gets dropped off at the transfer station as well as some tips on how to recycle more effectively.


Also in this series:

  • Part 2: Trash
  • Part 3: Recycling beyond single-stream
  • Part 4: Recycling beyond the transfer station
  • Part 5: The 5 R’s, and some numbers

Like many towns, Lincoln’s transfer station accepts single-stream recycling in a bin where people can toss paper and junk mail, cardboard, metal cans, plastic bottles, clean aluminum foil, and some plastic food and beverage containers. 

But then what happens to all that stuff after it leaves town? Waste Management (WM) picks up the roll-off containers of recyclables and takes them to its materials recovery facility (MRF) in Billerica, where everything is dumped onto a tipping floor. The commingled items are then loaded into an elaborate multi-step sorting machine that plucks out different materials at various points. As the items go by on a conveyor belt, human operators also pick out as much nonrecyclable material as they can. See videos of MRFs in action here and here.

Mixed paper and cardboard are easily recyclable and can be made into new cardboard, paper, paper napkins, etc. WM sells most of these materials to Pratt Industries and Westrock, according to Chris Lucarelle, Waste Management’s Area Director for Recycling Operations. Glass gets crushed and made into new glass products as well as fiberglass insulation. Metal cans meet a similar fate.

The biggest issue, of course, is plastic. Before 2018, MRFs sold much of America’s recyclables to China, which used them as raw materials for its growing industrial base but which also led to pollution in that country. But in 2018, China stopped accepting most so-called recyclables from North American and Europe as part of Operation National Sword because the loads were contaminated with too much nonrecyclable material.

As a result, a lot of plastic that was supposedly recycled by Americans goes into landfills and incinerators in the U.S. or is shipped to developing countries without the capacity to properly process it, which in turn results in more pollution of land, sea, and air worldwide (see “Reckoning with the U.S. Role in Global Ocean Plastic Waste,” a 2022 report by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 

Recycling plastic is especially problematic because there are so many variations in chemical composition, color, and transparency and many of these items can’t be mixed even after they’re separated from glass, metal, paper, etc. And it’s often too expensive to sort all these types of plastic, especially since it’s usually cheaper to make new plastic rather than use recycled plastic. Also, many well-intentioned residents engage in “wishcycling” — putting nonrecyclable items in their recycling bin and thus contaminating the load, as noted in this 2019 WBUR piece.

There’s a lot of understandable confusion when people try to figure out what plastics can and can’t be recycled. For example, single-use plastic cold drink cups can be recycled, but not their lids or straws. Black plastic takeout containers can’t be recycled, but their clear lids can. And many plastic items actually contain two or more types of plastic, so they’re also not recyclable. The days are gone when you could look at the number inside the triangle on the bottom of a container and immediately tell if it’s recyclable. 

Plastic items are labeled with a resin identification number inside a triangular recycling logo that indicates how the plastic was made. However, the recycling logo is deceptive. Just because a package or bottle has a number or recycling symbol doesn’t mean it’s recyclable. Instead, it indicates the molecular structure of the plastic, which is used to categorize what can and can’t be recycled. Plastics labeled #3, #4, #6 and #7 are not recyclable, according to the Conservation Law Foundation (see chart).

Click for larger image. (Source: Conservation Law Foundation)

Some argue that recycling plastic is almost hopeless because of this sorting issue and because disposable plastic is relatively cheap to make as well as sturdy and sanitary. By extending the shelf life of food, plastic packaging actually reduces food waste, which comprises a large portion of household trash (see the “Saving Food” chart in “The Cost of Plastic Packaging”). Composting goes a long way toward reducing the amount of trash that has to be incinerated.

New uses for recycled plastic

However, the market for recycled plastics is slowly growing, due in part to increasing pressure for manufacturers to use more post-consumer resin (PCR) in their products. WM has some of its recycled plastic made into residential bins for its own use (EcoCarts).

None of the plastics from Lincoln that wind up in WM’s Billerica facility are sold overseas, according to Lucarelle. “National Sword proved to be a good thing for U.S. recyclers and we have seen a lot of growth in the domestic market,” he said.

Many plastic bottles are made of polyethylene terephthalate (PET), which is often marked with the #1 symbol. One of the largest purchasers of WM’s PET is Unifi, which uses the plastic to create a textile fiber to make new products such as shoes, clothing and bags. Work clothing made from this fiber is now available to WM employees. WM also sells some of its HDPE and PP (high-density polyethylene and polypropylene, often marked as #2 and #5) to KW Plastics in Troy, Ala., which claims to be the world’s largest plastics recycler and resin supplier for those materials. 

State governments are also working to encourage more plastic conservation and recycling by industry. California now requires certain food service facilities to serve customers with packaging that is either reusable, recyclable, or compostable. Last year, Maine became the first state to require producers of packaged goods sold in the state to pay for maintaining and expanding municipal recycling programs — a so-called extended producer responsibility (EPR) law.

Burn, baby, burn

Other ways to dispose of plastic are traditional waste-to-energy incineration and pyrolysis, where mixed plastic is heated in a low-oxygen environment so it breaks into shorter-chain hydrocarbons that can then be used to make fuels and chemical feedstocks that can be fashioned back into polymers, creating a closed loop, according to Chemical and Engineering News (“Should plastics be a source of energy?”). However, as the article notes, waste-to-energy plants can produce only the amount of energy per day that they were designed to. Plastics have a higher energy content than most trash, so if the facility processes more plastics, it has to take in less waste overall.

Many multinational companies are partnering with cement manufacturers to burn unrecycled plastic waste in cement kilns, which operate at a very high temperature. Cement factories have traditionally burned coal, which is a major greenhouse gas producer. Plastic and trash are far cheaper fuel source, but the factories still cause a lot of air pollution, especially in countries where emissions regulations are inadequate or not enforced.

And the bigger problem remains. Less than 10% of all the plastic ever made has been recycled, mostly because it’s too costly to collect and sort. Plastic production, meanwhile, is projected to double within 20 years, according to Reuters. 

What you can and can’t recycle in Lincoln

Back here in Lincoln, how does an environmentally conscious resident know what’s recyclable? Recycle Smart MA (a program funded by the Massachusetts DEP) has an excellent Recyclopedia where you can quickly look up hundreds of different items. Waste Management also has a Recycling 101 website. A general rule of thumb: if it isn’t a container — or if you’re in doubt at all — put it in the trash.

Here are a few of the things that many people “wishcycle” that should not go into the single-stream container:

  • Single-use plastic drink lids, cutlery, straws
  • Polystyrene “to go” containers
  • Waxed cardboard milk/juice containers with plastic screw caps
  • Frozen food boxes (they also contain wax)
  • Paper cold drink cups with a wax coating
  • Paper coffee cups and their lids
  • Colored plastic cold cups (clear ones are OK)
  • Plastic food envelopes for snacks, drink pouches, etc.
  • Cardboard food canisters with metal rims containing nuts, chips, etc.
  • Black plastic takeout containers (though their clear lids are OK). Why? MRFs sort plastics by bouncing a beam of light off them. Since black plastic absorbs light, it can’t be sorted and goes straight to the incinerator.
  • Any kind of plastic bag, wrap or film
  • Padded paper mailing envelopes
  • Coat hangers, wires, tubing, etc. (these items, along with plastic bags, can tangle the sorting machinery)
  • Screws, nuts, bolts, tools, etc.
  • Larger metal or plastic objects such as toys, appliances, etc.
  • Styrofoam molded package insulation or packing peanuts
  • Rigid plastic form-molded packaging (sometimes glued to a cardboard backing)
  • Prescription medicine bottles
  • Anything contaminated with food

Category: conservation 9 Comments

Town bans almost all outside watering

July 26, 2022

Lincoln has gone to Stage 4 of watering restriction measures, meaning that all outdoor watering except for once-weekly drip irrigation and limited hand watering is banned until further notice. 

The move comes just days after a July 17 announcement that the town had gone to Stage 3 restrictions (watering allowed once a week). Since then, Massachusetts has experienced a heat wave, and no rain is in sight for the immediate future.

Lincoln follows guidelines set out by Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, which declared a “significant” drought on July 12 and a “critical” drought on July 21 in northeastern and central Massachusetts. Those guidelines ask residents to minimize overall water use (both town and well water, which draws from the same aquifer) and stop all non-essential outdoor watering, which means any watering that’s not required for health or safety reasons, food production livestock maintenance, or to meet the core functions of a business.

“For the time being, the Water Department is allowing hand watering by hose of personal vegetable gardens and watering by bucket or watering can of non-vegetable plantings. Using water from rain barrels or excess water from household activities is preferred,” Water Commission Chair Ruth Ann Hendrickson said on July 26.

Water Department staff will drive around town in the early mornings to check for water sprinklers in use and will leave warning cards for homes that are in violation. Some residents have automatic systems that they forget to adjust, or can’t right away because they’re away on vacation.

The town’s water use restriction bylaw mandates a $50 fine for the first violation and $100 for each subsequent violation. However, fines will not be assessed right away. “People need time to hear about it and adjust to it,” Hendrickson said.

The Water Commission plans to meet on Friday, July 29 at 1 p.m. to discuss the town’s drought response and to take a detailed look at the town’s water withdrawal permit and other sources of information “to see what wiggle room we have,” she added.

Since the Stage 4 status was announced on LincolnTalk on July 24, residents have offered several creative tips for water conservation, such as outdoor watering using water from pasta boiling, salad spinners, dehumidifiers, air conditioners, sump pumps, and showers (caught in a bucket while waiting for the water to get hot).

The last time the area experienced a “critical” drought was in August 2016, when area pond and reservoir levels were extremely low. Lincoln’s watering restriction stages have gotten somewhat more stringent since then.

More information:

  • Indoor water conservation
  • Outdoor water conservation
  • FAQ on private wells (page 96 of the state Drought Management Plan)
Stage 1Stage 2Stage 3Stage 4
Hand-held wateringAllowed 6pm–9amAllowed 7pm–7amAllowed 7pm–7amAllowed 7pm–7am
Above-ground/
in-ground sprinklers
Allowed 7pm–7am• Even house #s:
Tues & Sat

• Odd house #s
Wed & Sun
• Even house #s:
Sat only

• Odd house #s:
Sun only
Not allowed
Soaker hosesAllowed any time2 days a week1 day a weekNot allowed
Drip irrigationAllowed any time2 days a week1 day a week1 day a week
New lawnsAllowed any timeJune & Sept. only: 20 days of daily watering, then 2 days a week, 7pm–7amJune & Sept. only: 20 days of daily watering, then 1 day a week, 7pm–7amNot allowed
Washing vehiclesAllowed any timeCommercial services onlyCommercial services onlyCommercial services only
Washing buildings, pavementAllowed any timeNot allowedNot allowedNot allowed
Swimming pools, hot tubs, spas, JacuzzisAllowed any timeOne fill per season for new or repaired equipmentTopping off only (3" per month)Topping off or refill not allowed
Car wash fundraisersAllowed any timeAllowed any timeNot allowedNot allowed
Games or toys with continuous waterAllowed any timeAllowed any time (30 mins/day) on specified day (see row #2)Allowed any time (30 mins/day) on specified day (see row #2)Not allowed

Category: conservation Leave a Comment

ConCom approves new rules for town’s conservation trails

July 18, 2022

Maps showing the trails currently open to bikes, the proposed expansion, and the compromise presented on June 1 (the area outlined in yellow would not be open to bikes). Click to enlarge.

After months of debate and hundreds of comments and opinions shared by residents, the Conservation Commission unanimously approved new trail use regulations last week, meaning more trails — about 24% of the total or roughly double what’s currently allowed — will be open to bikes.

The new set of regulations (available in both abbreviated and detailed formats) are almost identical to the amended set proposed by the ConCom in June. The only differences: 

  • Some trails that are actually in Concord (though on land managed by Lincoln) will stay closed to bikes until Concord officials approve.
  • When approaching other trail users, dog owners must leash their dog or hold it by the collar, vs. the last iteration which required only “voice control” of the dog

(The rules linked to above do not reflect these two updates.)

Another new requirement that was the topic of much discussion is that dogs must be leashed on the entirety of Flint’s Pond conservation area to protect the town’s water supply. In addition, groups of five or more bikers must get a permit in advance to bike the trails together.

After getting public pushback in the spring, the commission cut back on the number of trails on Mt. Misery that it had proposed opening to bikes, but the approved regulations still opens substantially more trails in the popular conservation area than were permitted before. This change has been the subject of voluminous and heartfelt debate in LincolnTalk emails and several ConCom public hearings each attended by dozens of residents on Zoom.

“There are very strong opinions, pro and con” about bikes, horses and dogs on Lincoln’s trails,” and “I know we’re not going to make all of your happy tonight,” ConCom chair Susan Hall Mygatt said at the start of the July 13 meeting where the panel finally approved the changes. The approval was made final when the Lincoln Land Conservation Trust’s gave its parallel OK on July 15.

Conservation Department staff will make quarterly assessments of trail conditions and gather user feedback over the next year and report to the ConCom, which can make further changes at any time.

“If we see something dramatic happen, we’re not going to wait a year” to seek more adjustments to the rules, Conservation Director Michelle Grzenda said. Staff work year-round to monitor and maintain the trails, and they can close tails with signs and yellow caution tape when necessary, she noted.

Temporarily withheld from the array of trails newly open to bikes are those in the Adams Woods area straddling the Lincoln/Concord town line just west of the railroad tracks. An 87-acre parcel was transferred in the 1980s from Lincoln to Concord as conservation land, but Lincoln retained sole land management responsibility. Nonetheless, Concord conservation officials want a chance to weigh in.

Several residents who’ve been involved in offering feedback to the ConCom were not pleased with the outcome last week. 

“By opening up half the trails at Mt. Misery to biking officially, I think you’re going to get groups of people on bikes without a permit,” Barbara Peskin said. “The [parking] lot is already maxed out… I just think this is such a wrong thing to do, especially at Mt. Misery.” 

“I think you’re pushing boundaries. The strength and number of pushback [comments] you’re getting on this should be a signal to all of us that the town needs a lot more conversation about this issue of changing policies, and it needs to take place in a variety of arenas,” said Diana Beaudoin. Among her suggestions: studying policies in neighboring towns and allowing the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory committee to “broaden its work” on road safety before changing trail regulations.

Conservation Department staff will put up new signs over the summer, and town rangers will also be on hand to explain and enforce the rules. The department recently hired full-time Land Steward/Ranger William Leona, who will work some weekend hours, and he and Land Manager Ryan Brown will install the signs and help trail visitors understand trail expectations and rules.

“Although William and Ryan will be monitoring all of Lincoln’s conservation lands, specific emphasis and greater ranger presence will be focused on Flint’s Pond and Mt. Misery,” Grzenda said. In addition, the LLCT has funded a part-time seasonal ranger for the first time.

“I am excited that we are now going to be able to articulate our expectations of how we can enjoy these trails together,” Mygatt said after the vote. “And I am confident that we will be very satisfied by how this works out — not perfectly satisfied, but very satisfied.”

Category: conservation, land use Leave a Comment

ConCom proposes adjustments to new trail use guidelines

June 6, 2022

Maps showing the trails currently open to bikes, the proposed expansion, and the compromise presented on June 1 (the area outlined in yellow would not be open to bikes). Click to enlarge.

After getting pushback on a number of proposed changes to conservation trail use regulations, the Conservation Commission revised some of its recommendations and postponed a vote until at least June 22.

In recent weeks, dozens of residents submitted comments on the proposals and attended a May 18 public forum, while more than 70 people attended the June 1 ConCom meeting via Zoom. Many were against allowing some expansions in trail use as outlined in the panel’s April 25 draft regulations. The discussion focused on four aspects of the proposed revisions:

  • A leash requirement for more trails, particularly those around Flint’s Pond
  • Opening more of Mt. Misery’s trails to bicyclists
  • A requirement that dogs must be leashed when another trail user approaches 
  • A requirement that five or more bikers must get a group use permit in advance

ConCom chair Susan Hall Mygatt presented suggestions for adjusting the proposed rules in each case. She agreed it would be “more realistic” to require dogs to be at the owners side and under voice control rather than require the owners to put them on leashes every time they encounter another walker. 

Under the current rules, groups of 10 or more individuals are required to obtain a Group Use Permit ahead of time to use the trails. Section 9 of the proposed regulations makes that more specific, requiring a permit for 10 or more people (pedestrians), five or more bikers, and five or more horseback riders.  The amended suggestion includes a provision that rive or more “unrelated” bikers or horseback riders will need a permit, though some commenters at the June 1 meeting suggested tightening the biker group limit even further. ConCom members agreed that there should be some “wiggle room” for groups of children on a school outing.

There had also been disagreement about an earlier proposal to open up more trails to bikers. Mygatt and Conservation Director Michelle Grzenda presented a compromise whereby some of the trails on the northern side of the popular Mt. Misery area would remain closed to bikers.

“The erosion and wear and tear on Mt. Misery has increased significantly,” said resident Elizabeth Orgel.

However, resident Margaret Olson argued for more trail connectivity to help people get around town by bike as much as possible. “Reserving some areas for contemplative use makes sense but I’d like to work over time to open more of the trails to bikes,” she said. Another resident wondered whether the prohibition on motorized vehicles applied to e-bikes, which are growing in popularity.

Requiring dogs to be leashed around Flint’s Pond was proposed to protect the town water supply from contamination by dog feces, though there was some debate as to whether town water quality is currently suffering from the lack of such restraints. In recent years and especially since the Covid-19 endemic, more dogs and swimmers have been seen in the pond despite signs prohibiting anyone from getting closer than 20 feet from the water, as per state DEP regulations.

“We’ve just gotten lucky that the DEP hasn’t forced us to put a fence around all of it already,” said Water Commissioner Michelle Barnes, who is also chair of the Lincoln Land Conservation Trust/Rural Land Foundation.

“I think a lot of us question their effectiveness,” Barnes said about the signs listing prohibited activities. “Also, I think historically we haven’t had strong enforcement from the Police Department.”

Some years ago, there was a ranger program funded jointly by the Conservation and Water Departments, and that as a result, the DEP did not impose stricter Flint’s Pond and watershed water protection measures on the town. At an August 2020 Water Commission meeting, Barnes said she had discussed stepped-up enforcement and possible installation of video cameras to tackle the problem, though it’s unclear if any new measures were subsequently put in place. She also acknowledged that it’s difficult for police to catch people or dogs while they’re in the water.

The Conservation Commission will resume its discussion of trail regulations on Wednesday, June 22 at 8 p.m.

Category: conservation, news 3 Comments

News acorns

May 17, 2022

Trail use forum on May 18

There will be a Lincoln trail-use public forum held on Zoom on Wednesday, May 18 from 7–8:30 p.m. sponsored by the Lincoln Conservation Commission and the Lincoln Land Conservation Trust. The two organizations have completed a comprehensive review of the multiple uses of Lincoln’s trails and how best to manage them for the protection of open space and overall public benefit. Over the last year, they’ve sought public comments and feedback regarding ways people use and enjoy our open spaces and trails.

At the forum, the Conservation Commission will review the process we used to evaluate changes in allowed trail uses, present draft trail use regulations, and discuss proposed changes to our trail biking map and dog walking rules. Additional comments will be sought during and after this meeting. Afterwards, the commission will post the draft trail-use regulations on the Conservation Department website. Submit any comments to the Conservation Department (conservation@lincolntown.org or 781-259-2612) by Tuesday, May 25. Click here for the May 18 Zoom link.

The new phone books are here!

The long-awaited 2022 Lincoln directory produced by the Friends of the Lincoln Library will be delivered to all households in Lincoln this week. If you do not want a printed phone book, please bring your copy to either the main post office or the library.

Category: arts, charity/volunteer, conservation Leave a Comment

Clarification

May 16, 2022

The headline for the May 15 News Acorns item “Bench honoring Beaver Pond land donor is dedicated” was misleading. The stone seat given by the Garden Club was to honor all people who have been active in conservation in Lincoln over the years, not just land donor Jean Preston. The original headline has been updated.

Category: conservation Leave a Comment

My Turn: Vote yes on fossil fuels measure at Town Meeting

March 22, 2022

To the editor:

Twenty-five years ago, Emily and I made the great decision to raise our family in Lincoln. We chose a town that celebrated its history and made bold commitments to the community’s future. We have loved the trails and open spaces. We have appreciated the commitments to educating children and supporting our elders. We are excited to grow old here.

I am excited to support Article 31 at town meeting this Saturday. This article follows through on town commitments: to our collective health, the well-being of our planet, and the values we have already embraced. This article will help us reduce our dependence on fossil fuels for heating and cooking. New construction (home building and major renovations) that shifts us from natural gas and oil to electric power will help us to reduce carbon emissions.

Our town, our Commonwealth, and our country have made commitments to reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Our public health officials have warned us about the risks of exposure to fossil fuels and the compounds that result from combusting these fuels. Having enjoyed the benefits of electric heat pumps for the last three years — I can say with confidence that moving into a 21st-century mode of heating is a good idea!

In the last 25 years we haven’t suffered wildfires and catastrophic weather. While so many parts of the world have suffered from the ravages of climate change, we haven’t faced hardship. For our collective health in Lincoln and for all the people whose lives will be improved by reducing demand for fossil fuels, I hope you can make it to Town Meeting to vote for Article 31. Lincoln’s future was bright 25 years ago; let’s take some bold steps to ensure the next 25 years are bright too.

With thanks,

Tom Haslett
26 Baker Bridge Rd.


“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: conservation, My Turn, news 2 Comments

Group scales back proposal to ban fossil fuels in new construction

March 21, 2022

(Editor’s note: This story was amended on March 22 to include updated links to the original and revised versions of Article 31.)

A citizens’ petition on the warrant at Town Meeting asks residents to support the first step in a process that would allow Lincoln to restrict the use of fossil fuels in new buildings and major modifications, though the motion was later trimmed after getting pushback from the Select Board.

Lincoln’s motion would not generally require retrofitting existing buildings, although the new bylaw could be applied to “major modifications,” which some other towns have defined to mean gut renovations that redo at least 75% of the building floor area, according to a GEC blog post. The exact wording of the local measure would be discussed later and voted on at a future Town Meeting.

Green Energy Committee chair Paul Shorb outlined the proposal at the March 7 Select Board meeting. Brookline, Acton, Arlington, Lexington, and Concord have filed similar home rule petitions but the legislature has not acted on any of them yet, he said. If approved by Lincoln voters on March 26, the measure would authorize the town to file a home rule petition with the state legislature, which is required for a town to exercise such authority.

The original motion under discussion (Article 31) proposed a vote on both the home-rule petition and specific bylaw language (“Act Authorizing the Town of Lincoln to Adopt and Enforce Local Regulations Restricting New Fossil Fuel Infrastructure in Certain Construction”) that the town could adopt if the legislature approved the petition. Ideally, Shorb said, the legislature would pass a bill requiring these limits on fossil fuel equipment in all new Massachusetts buildings, and such a bill is pending, “but we think it’s appropriate for us to jump in line as well,” either to win home-rule approval or show town support for the bill. “We chose the more aggressive approach, ‘get to the nitty gritty right now’ approach.”

“I fundamentally have a problem with this sort of method,” Select Board member James Craig said. “I’m not arguing against the cause in any way — it’s more the process.” He added that he might have been more receptive “if this were something that had been in the works for a longer period and had outreach done earlier” to show that the measure had been “really discussed and vetted.”

Arlington has taken a more “vanilla” approach by approving only a home rule petition that lets the town draw up its own bylaw at a later date, bard member Jennifer Glass observed.

Shorb responded that the more specific version including the bylaw would “send a strong political signal” for the state to approve certain updates to the 2009 “stretch code” that lays out energy-efficiency requirements in the building code. The Department of Energy Resources is in the process of updating the stretch code and writing a new “Municipal Opt-in Specialized Stretch Energy Code” in the wake of the Climate Act of 2021. Environmentalists are hoping that the “stretchier” code will allow towns to ban fossil fuel hookups (which they currently may not do), though the initial draft does not include that option for towns.

Debating and amending wording of motions such as the proposed bylaw language on the floor of Town Meeting “is really something we ought to avoid trying to do,” Town Administrator Tim Higgins said. “The Arlington approach may [allow us to] be able to thread that needle to create the pressure you’re looking for but give us more time to work up a bylaw.”

After getting similar feedback from the Planning Board, the GEC subsequently removed the proposed bylaw language from the Article 13 motion (the updated wording is here).

Category: conservation, government, news Leave a Comment

Town restarting project to install solar array at landfill

March 10, 2022

The plan to install a solar array atop the old town landfill has lain fallow for a while, but it will “go near the top of our priority list to restart that process” once the Annual Town Meeting is over, said Town Administrator Tim Higgins.

Almost five years ago, voters approved a land swap in conjunction with the Wang property purchase that allowed the town to move several acres of the landfill parcel out of conservation so a solar array could be installed there. The area was deemed the best spot out of 25 potential sites for a municipal solar array that were studied earlier by a consultant hired by the now-defunct Solar PV Working group. Higgins said this week that the site could generate 1 MW of electricity, or enough to power all of the town-owned buildings except the school, which will have its own solar array.

But the project stalled due to factors including the pandemic and the complexity of the process. Minute Man National Historical Park owns the right of way on either side of Route 2A, so the town would need their approval to install power lines from the landfill out to the road. It’s unclear whether who would need to grant that approval — the park superintendent, a regional director or someone at the federal level.

Also yet to be determined is where that line will go (alongside or under the transfer station driveway, or via Mill Street), and whether it will be above ground or underground. If Mill Street is seen as the better option, town officials will discuss the matter with residents there, although Higgins said the line would not have to cross any private property. Any underground work will probably also require an archeological survey, he said. 

Finally, the town will have to identify a solar developer and get estimates for up-front costs for that company and the town. The goal is to “generate income for the community or [have it be] a break-even proposition at least,” Higgins said. He and other officials are working with Beth Greenblatt of Beacon Integrated Solutions, the firm that was involved in creating the power purchase agreement for the school’s solar installation. He estimated that all the planning and permitting could be completed by the end of 2022.

Category: conservation, land use Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 30
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Five graduate after 13 years together as Girl Scouts June 25, 2026
  • Legal notice: Historical Commission (58 Codman) June 25, 2026
  • Legal notice: ZBA (July 9, 2026 hearing) June 25, 2026
  • News acorns June 23, 2026
  • Police log for June 8–21, 2026 June 23, 2026

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Advanced search

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2026 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.