The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

land use

Property sales in October 2021

52 Todd Pond Rd. — Juliet M. Rago McNamara Trust to Andriy and Inna Kochura for $525,000 (October 29)

192 Weston Rd. — Bojan Rip to Michael Olsen for $1,200,000 (October 29)

8 Huntley Lane — Thomas A. Cappucci to Yukiko Bloomenthal Trust and 8 Huntley Lane Nominee Trust for $1,340,000 (October 29)

21A South Commons — Jeffrey Arena to Nicholas Bliamptis for $505,000 (October 25)

14 Stratford Way — Gustav Beerel to Brian Hoertdoerfer and Emily Marcus-Hoertdoerfer for $2,210,000 (October 6)

49 Round Hill Rd. — Christopher Awtrey to [redacted, 2025] for $2,000,000 (October 4)

11 Stratford Way — Walter McCarty to Jacob Housman and Catherine Buzney for $2,300,00 (October 4)

22 Deerhaven Rd. — Diane Marangoly to Ramesh Natarajan and Aruna Ramesh for $1,390,000 (October 1)

Town gets $400,000 for South Lincoln septic plant design work

The town has received a $400,000 state grant to design and engineer an upgrade to the wastewater treatment plant in South Lincoln, which owners of the mall have been advocating as a requirement for redeveloping that commercial area.

Lincoln Planning officials have been considering ways to rezone South Lincoln to encourage denser housing and mixed-use development in the larger area encompassing the mall, the MBTA station and adjacent businesses, Ridge Road, Doherty’s Garage, and Lewis Street. Among the ideas is redeveloping the mall (which is in tenuous condition financially) by adding a second story for housing. But the Rural Land Foundation, which owns the mall, has said that the wastewater treatment plant that serves both the mall and Lincoln Woods will need an upgrade for any redevelopment to be feasible. 

As a result, the town applied for a $400,000 grant even as it awaited the results of an engineering study by Wright-Pierce to evaluate the condition of the plant and see if it could handle additional septic capacity. Phase 1 of the study was completed in October and showed that the 35-year-old plant, though “a little long in the tooth” and needing some work, is operating at about 50% of its 26,000 gallon-per-day capacity and could handle some additional residents and businesses.

The town applied for the grant before knowing any of the study’s results because “you always have to plan the next step and the next step” in advance, said Paula Vaughn-MacKenzie, director of planning and land use.

“As that [study] was going on, we knew that if we could get a grant to cover [upgrading the treatment plant], that would benefit both the town and Community Builders,” which owns the 125-unit Lincoln Woods and the plant, Vaughn-MacKenzie said. “Everybody knew it was working but everyone also knew it was old… this entire evaluation is in response to the feedback we’ve been getting from the public asking about the infrastructure, and we know we can’t have redevelopment without the infrastructure” to support it.

The mall originally had a separate wastewater treatment facility that failed, and the RLF has been contracting with Community Builders to use the Lincoln Woods system for some years.

Wright-Pierce said earlier that Phase 2 of the study, which should be complete by the end of the year, will look at whether the existing plant can handle flow above 26,000 gallons per day for which it’s permitted, alternative treatment methods with a life-cycle cost analysis, and a recommendation on how to proceed, both with flows and treatment type. It’s unclear if that remaining work will be affected by news of the grant.

The grant money isn’t targeted at a specific project, “but it will provide a framework for going forward,” Vaughn-MacKenzie said. After Phase 2 is complete, “we’ll look at options and discuss with the community and Community Builders what the capacity and various costs will be” to upgrade the plant.

Vaughn-MacKenzie said she had asked Wright-Pierce and two other engineering firms for a ballpark estimate for upgrading or replacing the plant and was told it would be around $400,000, so that’s the figure she used in the grant request.

The town had been under a public announcement embargo while a formal announcement ceremony was being organized. Mike Kennealy, Secretary of Housing and Economic Development, will appear at the event at Town Hall on Wednesday, Nov. 17 at 3:30 p.m. 

SOTT #2: South Lincoln, climate action, and diversity and inclusion

Planning officials will keep working on revising the zoning bylaw to encourage business and mixed-use development in South Lincoln, in keeping with the town’s comprehensive plan and vision statement as well as pressure from the state to allow denser development near MBTA stops.

Planning Board Margaret Olson summarized the past and current work in this area at the second State of the Town meeting on November 2. The meeting also featured discussions surrounding two new organizations, the Climate Action Planning Committee and the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Antiracism Initiative (see below).

About four years ago, the board created the South Lincoln Planning Advisory Committee (SLPAC) to map out easy to “create a compact, vital, walkable village center in the Lincoln Station area that provides more housing choices near public transportation, goods and services for residents and opportunities for social interaction” as per Lincoln’s 2009 Comprehensive Plan. In May 2018, SLPAC unveiled proposed zoning changes that met with strong opposition from residents worried about changing the town’s character and shifting too much power for approving development projects from Town Meeting to the Planning Board.

More recently, the reorganized SLPAC published a town-wide survey on South Lincoln. The results revealed, among other things, that a large majority of respondents want to retain a village center with commercial businesses and support the economic viability of those businesses. 

“We believe we need to do something down by South Lincoln in order to achieve this,” Olson said. “The commercial viability [in that area] is marginal.”

Olson explained that the board is not aiming to increase the amount of space devoted to commercial uses. “What we’re really talking about is, if the mall is redeveloped, allowing housing on a second story and permitting mixed-use” developments, she said. “We’re not going to attempt to build some sort of giant mall — we want to promote a sense of place and community.”

Olson summarized the hodgepodge of zoning districts in South Lincoln and the difficulty faced by potential developers in proposing projects that can ultimately win approval — especially when an up-or-down vote is required at Town Meeting where it’s not possible in practice for residents to propose amendments to plans. 

Another issue is that most businesses are required to secure a time-limited special permit that can’t be later transferred to a new owner. “This is kind of a scary thing — you need a special permit and then it expires and then what do you do? This is a big deterrent,” she said. “We believe a new zoning bylaw will get us better projects.”

Even if the town relaxes some limitations in the bylaw, “there’s nothing that prevents us from being extremely specific about what we do and do not want” in terms of a building’s overall appearance, materials used, etc., as well as requiring traffic and fiscal studies, green buildings, community spaces, and/or affordable housing, she said. “It provides parameters for developers… they know what they need to do and we know what we’re going to get.” 

Another source of pressure for change is the Housing Choice and MBTA Community legislation passed by the state legislature earlier this year. Though it’s not yet being enforced, the legislation requires a multifamily housing zone near MBTA stops such as Lincoln’s commuter rail station. If a town doesn’t comply by allowing such development, it stands to lose what could be a considerable amount of money in state grants.

“The town really does have a decision to make about how much we care… We don’t actually have to do this,” Olson said. It’s also unclear what exactly will satisfy the state requirements. “It says the district has to be of ‘reasonable size’ but we don’t know what that means,” she added.

In a Q&A session, several residents reiterated their criticism of the survey, but Olson was clear that “we do not intend to redo the survey. We understand what people’s frustrations were and it was very helpful to hear those viewpoints,” but the survey “is just one small piece of information among many.”

Sara Mattes argued against the proposed changes. “It’s not clear what problem we’re really trying to solve,” she said. If the mall’s financial struggles are the primary concern, “the driver is for us to sit down with RLF and Community Builders [owners of Lincoln Woods and the South Lincoln wastewater treatment plant] and work on a solution directly.” She also noted that there are numerous apartment and condominium complexes in town where downsizing residents can move.

But Sasha Golden, a resident of Farrar Pond Village, pushed back, noting that vacancies occur only when a unit’s owner dies. “To make a sweeping assumption that we have all these different sites is really missing the actual day-to-day issue of vacancy and affordability.”

“I disagree with Sara. I would love to see market forces deciding what housing and development should come to Lincoln for once,” said Jim Hutchinson, describing himself as an “unrepentant capitalist.” Saying that the economic environment in South Lincoln is “not good,” he decried those who “don’t want any change without 15 committees to approve it first… I think it’s good for some experimentation to be allowed in this town. 

Terry Perlmutter, a realtor, argued that the town needs more affordable housing. Developments such as those mentioned by Mattes may be perceived as affordable, “but affordable to whom? They are just the ‘more affordable’ housing in an expensive community.”

Climate Action Planning Committee

A new town group urged residents to follow the example of many neighboring towns and fund a sustainability manager position while also developing a climate action plan

The Climate Action Planning Committee (CAPC, a subgroup of the Green Energy Committee) made its pitch at the second State of the Town meeting on November 2.

The Commonwealth recently passed a climate roadmap calling for net zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050, “and state goals cannot be met unless cities and towns do their part,” CAPC member Sue Klem said. 

A Zoom poll during the State of the Town meeting asked attendees what fuel types they use to heat their home and power their cars (click to enlarge).

A climate action looks at reducing carbon emissions from things like buildings, transportation, electrical generation and land use, she explained. Examples of specific town-wide actions might include energy retrofits on buildings, changes in the building code, electrifying town vehicle fleets and tools, and installing electric vehicle charging stations.

Lincoln, like several other towns in the region, has produced a greenhouse gas emissions report (which will be updated soon) and offered community choice for electricity. Before the Green Energy Choice program began, only 16% of electricity consumed in town was from wind and solar, but that figure is now up to 45%, she noted. However, it has not yet followed the area’s lead in establishing a climate action plan, which will provide “the structure and guidance we will need to address the climate crisis.”

The town should also hire a sustainability manager to help plan and promote green policies, Klem said. The cost for that position could be mostly or entirely offset by grants, she added.

The CAPC is in the process of talking to town boards and committees and will host a public frum in the next few weeks to hear questions and comments in preparation for submitting a warrant article for the ATM this spring.

IDEA Initiative

A group of residents was recruited earlier this year to make recommendations on establishing a new committee that would investigate unconscious bias and actively promote an antiracist community. 

In September, the Select Board formally allowed the IDEA Initiative to pivot from designing a committee and simply become that committee. They plan to research efforts by other towns (some of whom have hired diversity coordinators), partnering with the Welcome, Inclusion, Diversity, Equity group and the schools, and securing funding and hiring a consultant on equity measures “to keep Lincoln’s vision of fostering and supporting diversity at the center,” IDEA member Jen James said. Among the possibilities: a town-wide 21-day group challenge to discuss and reflect on readings, videos, and podcasts.

Among the questions IDEA is wrestling with: “What does racism look like in Lincoln? Where does classism exist? What is Lincoln willing or unwilling to change to become a truly antiracist town? We want to be taking action, not just making recommendations,” she said.

Property sales for September 2021

15C South Commons — Christine Lundblad to Anne Lovell for $549,000 (September 28)

16 Bypass Road — McLean Hospital Corp. to Scott Rodman for $850,000 (September 2)

23 Bypass Rd. — McLean Hospital Corp. to Yu Liu and Lujia Zou for $2,178,000 ( September 3)

5 Mary’s Way — Mary O’Brien Trust to Cheryl O’Brien and James Durkin for $570,000 (September 1)

12 Acorn Lane — Marcus Lincoln to Christopher Coke and Tania Abedian for $1,285,000 (September 30)

123 Chestnut Circle — William A. Galup Jr. to Robten Realty Corp. for $400,000 (September 8)

 

South Lincoln treatment plant has capacity for more development

The first phase of an engineering study of the wastewater treatment plant near the mall shows that it’s working well and has additional capacity to handle some commercial or residential development in the area.

The plant in the field about 1,500 feet north of the apartments was built in 1975 to serve the Lincoln Woods apartments and the businesses in the mall. It’s now owned and operated by TCB (The Community Builders), which is paying part of the cost of the Wright-Pierce study. The town needs to know the status of the plant to make informed decisions about rezoning South Lincoln to allow for more types of development.

The plant is “a little long in the tooth” and the building used mainly for records and water testing is in bad shape and needs to be replaced soon, said Kevin Olson, senior project manager at Wright-Pierce, as he presented Phase 1 of the study to the Planning Board meeting on October 5. However, after visiting the plant and looking at maintenance records, the plant is “performing well and is not overloaded,” said his Wright-Pierce colleague Adam Higgins.

The plant’s state permit allows it to handle up to 26,000 gallons per day of wastewater, though its average annual flow is less than half that. “There’s still available treatment capacity and flow capacity,” Higgins said.

Assuming the plant is maintained but not substantially upgraded or replaced, it will cost about $311,000 for work that should be done within the next five years and another $121,000 (in 2021 dollars) for work done in five to 15 years, according to the study.

Phase 2 of the study will look at whether the plant can handle flow above 26,000 gallons per day (gpd) for which it’s permitted, alternative treatment methods with a life-cycle cost analysis, and a recommendation on how to proceed, both with flows and treatment type.

“The increase in flow will likely be cut off at 40,000 gpd, but we’re waiting for input from the Planning Board and SLPAC [the board’s South Lincoln Planning and Advisory Committee] if more is desired based on wanting additional commercial/residential development,” Higgins said in an email. 

The Phase 2 report is due in early December, with a report to the Planning Board expected shortly before Christmas.

Neither the board nor SLPAC has voted on how the cost will be divided between the town and TCB if plant upgrades are desired, “but my expectation is that whoever does the development will pay for any required treatment plant work or expansion,” board Chair Margaret Olson said. “That being said, the town does need to know what can be done and what it would cost before investing large amounts of staff and volunteer time into proposing changes that would require wastewater treatment.”

Residents slam South Lincoln survey at forum

Current zoning in South Lincoln (left) and the changes that were proposed in 2020 (click image for larger version).

Residents at a September 28 public forum to discuss the results of a survey on the future of South Lincoln criticized the study as being biased toward development and asked for another survey done by an objective professional.

The survey was open from May 14 to June 30, and data and comments from the 790 responses were released in August. Results indicated that residents have mixed feelings about South Lincoln. There was no consensus on whether the village center should change, and respondents wanted both a viable commercial center and perhaps some moderately priced housing but also wanted to maintain the town’s rural character.

“People want more benefits but not the things that could lead to those benefits,” observed resident Jen Morris.

“Welcome to our world,” quipped Planning Board Chair Margaret Olson.

Potential drivers for change include a new state law that will require areas near MBTA train stations to allow denser housing, though the specific details and any penalties for noncompliance are still unclear. The state aims to encourage more housing construction along with public transportation use, but since most of the daily commuting by train to Boston ended due to the pandemic, the viability of South Lincoln as a commuter point is also unclear, with or without new housing nearby.

Another factor: although Lincoln is generally wary of growing its population, enrollment at the Lincoln School has been declining over the past several years. “We have plenty of capacity in the Lincoln School to accept many additional students and would welcome more students,” Superintendent of School Becky McFall wrote in an email to Olson, who shared it at the forum attended by more than 50 residents via Zoom.

McFall is expected to send a more detailed memo regarding school enrollment in October.

In the survey, 46% of respondents said they supported more affordable or moderately priced housing in South Lincoln, but one-third either did not support it at all, or supported it in a location other than the South Lincoln village center.

“I support activity such as a playground, dog park and community gathering/meeting point, etc., [but] as I have said many times, there is a lot we could do to have a viable town center without adding new rental units,” Planning Board member Lynn DeLisi wrote in the chat area of the Zoom forum.

Also affecting possible development in South Lincoln is the limited capacity of the septic system that currently serves the mall and Lincoln Woods. A study is currently underway by engineers who will make a preliminary report at the Planning Board’s October 5 meeting. And even if the mall were to be redeveloped, there isn’t agreement about what sort of businesses can achieve long-term success there, given the proliferation of online shopping and nearby stores such as Market Basket and Costco, forum attendees noted.

Both the mixed-use zoning that was proposed in early 2020 by the Planning Board and the notion of “if you build it they will come” are “flawed models,” said Richard Ohlsten, adding that many storefronts in the Wayland Center development are still vacant years after completion. “I’m not opposed to development but let’s just do something smart and unique. If we get this wrong, there’s no going back.”

Many brick-and-mortar stores in Lincoln and elsewhere are struggling, “and I don’t know that we can build our way out of it,” resident Sara Mattes said. She suggested looking into subsidizing the types of  businesses that Lincoln wants, or even using Community Preservation Act funds to buy smaller houses and “put into permanent affordability… it’s the kind of crazy forward thinking that Lincoln used to do with land acquisition and preservation,” she said.

Many residents at the forum said the survey questions were skewed and urged the Planning Board to commission another survey, this time using an outside firm. “The survey wasn’t designed to hear from those of us who are opposed to development,” said Barbara Peskin.

Mattes suggested framing questions in terms of what tradeoffs people are willing to make to achieve certain objectives. “The information generated in the survey has been questioned, and to use it to guide or direct any potential change, some of us feel, is not appropriate,” she said.

Property sales in August 2021

81 Lincoln Rd. — Jan E. Nyquist Trust to Michael and Leah Bloom for $3,110,000 (August 27)

148 Sandy Pond Rd. — Marilyn Kasputys to Kenneth Lepage and Marianna Parker for $3,150,000 (August 26)

0 and 100 Lincoln Rd. (two parcels) — Laura Sander to John Riley and Evelyne DeLori for a total of $1,455,000 (August 19)

10 Beaver Pond Rd. — Philip Greenspun for Anne Buxton Sobol Trust for $1,750,000 (August 16)

51 Page Rd. — Charles Staples Trust to Charles O. Staples Trust for $747,500 (August 12)

64 Trapelo Rd. — Philip DeNormandie Trust to Mark and Machiko Hewitt for $975,000 (August 10)

124 Chestnut Circle — Luiz de Oliveira to Norra S. Kinne Trust and Aaron W. Kinne Trust for $700,000 (August 4)

100 Concord Rd. — Gregory Gale to Risa Lavelle for $863,000 (August 2)

Three adjoining parcels sold on August 2:

  • 131 Weston Rd. — Berryfield LLC to Berryfield Farm LLC for $2,736,155
  • 133 Weston Rd. — George W. Berry to Berryfield Farm LLC for $4,888,845
  • 0 Weston Rd. — George W. Berry Trust to George W. Berry Trust for $4,888,845

17 Stonehedge — Joseph Soucy to Daniel L. Gombos Trust and Julia S. Gombos Trust for $1,810,000 (August 2)

Property sales in July

8 Hawk Hill Rd. — Matthew Bellias to Robrecht Thoonen and Patricia Nobre for $1,500,000 (July 29)

82 Virginia Rd. #B409 — William Stanton to Kathleen Kellett for $399,000 (July 29)

24 Beaver Pond Rd. — Astrid Glynn to Astrid’s Hillside Acre Realty Trust for $1,425,000 (July 28)

28 Old Concord Rd. — Keith Gilbert to Richard and Andrea Patton for $3,200,000 (July 28)

105 Trapelo Rd. — Elizabeth Tylko to Ross Tucker and Hilary Dionne for $1,425,000 (July 28)

28 Windingwood Lane — Elizabeth Whitman Trust to John Rizzo and Donna MacDonald for $725,650 (July 28)

158 Bedford Rd. — Norris Kalisch to Kimberly Kerr and Rita Sherrer for $993,000 (July 28)

208 Concord Rd. — Alexis Borggaard to Ian McMahan and Lee Mei Yan for $1,150,000 (July 23)

264 Lincoln Rd. — Linda Karman to Christine Size and Kelley Kerber for $795,000 (July 23)

15 Goose Pond Rd. — Salvatore S. Pivitera Trust to Roberto Santamaria and Maureen Masterson for $1,400,000 (July 23)

15 Deer Run Rd. — Vincent Cannistraro to Lu Li and Qi Xue for $2,250,000 (July 19)

25 Baker Farm Rd. — Paola M. Rossoni Trust and Peter Rossoni to Peter and Gemma Rossoni for $886,722 (July 19)

5D South Commons — Cherilyn Bruno Lynch Trust to Jeffrey Miller and Jennifer Brown for $560,000 (July 19)

46 Greenridge Lane — James Echmalian to Jean Granick for $585,000 (July 19)

67 Lincoln Rd. — John O’Connor to Stephen Edsall and Janice Owen for $1,500,000 (July 16)

344 Hemlock Circle — Jeffrey Patterson to Lev Lipkin for $730,000 (July 15)

140 Lincoln Rd. — Melody Elliott to John and Diana Cowles for $440,000 (July 14)

23 South Great Rd. — David Skok to Christine Fletcher for $5,800,000 (July 13)

179 South Great Rd. — Dorothy R. Bockoven Trust to Ardit Kotoni and Caroline Keefe for $830,000 (July 12)

111 Tower Rd. — Forrest St. Clair to Satayan Mahajan for $2,175,000 (July 9)

235 Aspen Circle — Anne K. Meade Trust to Christine Sarkisian and Anton Marc for $672,567 (July 9)

46 Round Hill Rd. — Myra Green to Stephanie Delacroix and Jeffrey O’Dell for $1,850,000 (July 1)

47 Old Concord Rd. — Phillip and Suzanne Reynolds Ayoub for $1,425,000 (July 1)

Survey shows mixed feelings about boosting development in South Lincoln

(Image by upklyak – freepik.com)

Lincoln residents want to keep the post office, restaurants, and some retail offerings in South Lincoln, but they also want to retain the town’s rural character, according to results of a survey released last week.

The Planning Board, which launched the survey in May, will host a discussion of the results on Tuesday, Sept. 28 at 7 p.m. The agenda and Zoom information will be available on the town calendar and the board’s web page prior to the meeting.

For the last two-plus years, the Planning Board has been considering changes to the zoning in the area around the Mall at Lincoln Station and the commuter rail station. The goal is to encourage more diversity in housing in that area as well as commercial activity, services, and amenities in and around the mall.

One of the drivers is a measure passed by the state in 2020 that, among other things, requires towns with a commuter rail station or other public transit (“MBTA communities”) to allow multifamily housing by right within half a mile of the station or lose access to various state grants. The specific implications for Lincoln are unclear because details still being worked out at the state level, but all towns are considered to be in compliance for now.

Among the survey data points:

  • 47% of respondents wanted to see changes in South Lincoln, while 17% did not and 36% weren’t sure.
  • The most important goals for respondents were retaining a village center with commercial businesses (80%) and supporting their economic viability (76%), followed by maintaining the town’s rural character (72%), minimizing environmental impact (70%), and ensuring accessibility for all ages and abilities (68%).
  • The features that garnered the most support were a post office (91%), retail offerings such as a grocery store (88%), and restaurants and entertainment (76%). The only feature that had more opponents than supporters was additional parking (29% to 19%, with 51% neutral).
  • 24% wanted no additional housing in the village center, while 27% preferred 50-100 units and 26% weren’t sure.
  • In a post-pandemic environment, 47% said they planned to use the commuter rail one to five times a year, while 7% said they would take the train three to five times a week and 31% said they never would.
  • The biggest factors influencing the responses were concerns about the environment and an increased focus on climate change and sustainability, followed by the increased cost of housing in the region.

The number of people who filled out the survey isn’t clear, but 91% said they own their own home, and about the same proportion are in their 40s to 70s.

Many respondents included long and thoughtful comments with their responses (the compilation is more than 80 pages long). Those comments skewed heavily toward not wanting additional development and wanting to maintain the town’s rural character. Some accused the survey writers of being pro-development and not recognizing the quality of commercial and pedestrian/bike-friendly amenities already in place. Several also called for a restaurant with a more family-friendly atmosphere and menu.

A sampling of comments:

  • “I am not sure higher-density housing near commuter rail will support persons with modest incomes to live in Lincoln as commuter rail schedules/fees are not aligned with all needs/income levels of workers.”
  • “I don’t shop at Donelan’s: limited variety, low quality, high price. Retail is struggling everywhere as people have shifted to shop on line. Only personal services (P.O., salon, dry cleaner) and fresh items will draw shoppers.”
  • “Need a family-friendly moderately-priced restaurant that serves lunch and dinner and is long term!”
  • “Don’t spend any taxpayer money on changing the town center. Leave it alone. We just spent $93 million on schools.”
  • “I want to discourage further growth in Lincoln. I’m perfectly happy to travel to other towns to keep Lincoln small and rural. If I wanted a town with more development, I would move to one.”
  • “Changing the town, in which homeowners have chosen to buy property based on the rural, undeveloped character, in order to promote the political goals of a few, is problematic.”
  • “It is essential that Lincoln broaden its population by including affordable one- or two-bedroom apartments in a dense and sustainably constructed housing development that is within walking distance of the MBTA and the mall. The DPW should move to the current site of the transfer station.”
  • “Turn the village into community/town use.”
  • “Really am not sure why a small group of development-minded people keep pushing for these changes… as with so much planning in Lincoln, it seems completely ill advised and a project that the next generation will regret for years to come.”
  • “One of my worries is that increased density will require municipal sewer and/or force us to join the MWRA for water. Lincoln’s rural character is maintained in part by the need for sufficient acreage per dwelling so that the land can support the burden we put on it. Municipal sewers would make out current zoning no longer justifiable and could threaten the rural. character of the town.”
  • “If we don’t change something, we will keep losing businesses and the town center will be a shell of itself.”
  • “The Town of Lincoln must develop a larger commercial base for the town. The taxes charged for residential homes are becoming unsustainable.”
  • “I’m strongly in favor of changes to the center to increase housing density and shopping options even if it means more vehicle traffic — and I live on Lincoln Rd.”
  • “It is not clear that residents in any new housing near Lincoln Station would drive less than other residents. It seems reasonable to assume that increased density will come with an increase in cars, especially in a town like Lincoln that simply cannot provide enough resources within walking distance to anyone.”
  • “We need to fill the vacant properties we have in South Lincoln before we begin to expand commercial/multi-use development. In expanding available housing units, is there a proven, commensurate uptick in local commercial patronization? ”
  • “I want the rural town I bought into. Just because someone got their MS in town planning doesn’t mean we have to change out the town to stroke their edifice complex. Biased questions — should have a column for ‘leave what we bought into alone’.”
  • “Lincoln is long overdue to add business and cultural opportunities and help reduce the tax burden on its residents. Soon only the ultra-rich will be able to afford living in Lincoln.”
  • “Too many apartments and condos already.”

Property sales in June 2021

54 Baker Bridge Rd. — Carroll School to David Mauch for $1,721,000 (June 30)

10 Silver Birch Lane — Benjamin Whittaker to Ryan and Elizabeth Bouldin for $1,400,000 (June 21)

0 Twin Pond Lane (parcel 118-10-0) — Jeffrey C. Birchby Trust to Susan Allen and Michelle Barnes for $625,000 (June 18)

0 Twin Pond Lane (parcel 118-13-0) — Jena Salon-Birchby to Susan Allen and Michelle Barnes for $175,000 (June 18)

11 Huckleberry Hill — Shih Ying Lee to Philip Eliopoulos Trust for $997,300 (June 22)

32B Indian Camp Lane unit B — Patrick McCusker to Oleksandr Dziuba and Yulia Zozulia for $449,000 (June 15)

38 Longmeadow Rd. — John Donahue to Arvind Grover and Carolyn Crandall for $1,695,000 (June 15)

26 Old Winter St. — Aire Maija Schwann Trust to Matt and Jon Anderson-Miller for $1,000,000 (June 9)

207 Tower Rd. — Lincoln LLC to Gabriel Palaez for $1,288,000 (June 4)

2 Giles Rd. — Leslie Kaufmann to Nicole Bensen and Galen Missig for $1,450,000 (June 1)