32D Indian Camp Lane — James Hogan to Michael Grigelevich and Johannah Ash for $418,500 (January 31)
165 Bedford Rd. — Colleen Fong Trust to Lauren Briere for $763,000 (January 31)
39 Brooks Rd. — Sanjeev Verma to L.A.M.B. Trust for $1,950,000 (January 28)
16 Huckleberry Hill — Stephanie Stankard to Emily Ann Stankard Trust and Sara Lee Stankard Trust for $1,000,000 (January 24)
In this map of The Commons campus, the additional units that had been proposed are shown in yellow.
Faced with resident objections and a tight timeline, New England Life Plan Communities, which owns The Commons in Lincoln, has postponed their push for an expansion proposal that was slated for a February 28 Planning Board public hearing.
Owner’s representative OnePoint Partners submitted a proposal to the Planning Board on February 6 that called for 32 new apartments in the existing Flint and Russell buildings and eight freestanding and attached cottages at various locations on the campus. This gave residents and others about three weeks to prepare for the public hearing, which would have preceded a vote at the March 25 Annual Town Meeting. Because The Commons resides in a zoning overlay district with specific conditions, a two-thirds majority approval would have been required at that time.
“We have engaged in several conversations with current Commons residents and it has become clear that more collaboration is required to address certain elements of the project. In order to ensure these critical stakeholders are given multiple opportunities to provide input, we need more time than the few weeks before the March Town Meeting allows,” said Larry Bradshaw, chairman of the board of New England Life Plan Communities, in a February 23 letter to the Planning Board.
David Levington, a Commons resident who has been active in organizing opposition to the proposal, said he was “pleased and relieved” by the postponement. “Everyone will have to work together in an open manner so that The Commons can grow in a manner that is healthy for all. The upset has been corrected and we’re moving forward — residents, management, ownership.”
He didn’t specify whether some aspects of the proposal were more objectionable than others but added, “Eventually a new plan will be developed… and I do look forward to a collaboration in which the residents have a voice.”
“Thanks to the efforts of the executive director of The Commons, Reynaldo LeBlanc, and the Resident Council, a number of formats were provided for residents to present their questions and concerns about the proposed expansion of The Commons to the new owners and their consultant and management teams,” said council president Judith Foster. “As a result of these meetings, the owners have withdrawn the proposed plan in order to allow more time to address the concerns of residents. We are looking forward to a productive partnership between residents and the ownership team.”
In this map of The Commons campus, the proposed additional units are shown in yellow (click to enlarge).
Citing a long waiting list as well as the area’s aging demographics, The Commons in Lincoln is proposing to add 40 new independent living units along with more parking‚ but some current residents aren’t happy about the prospect.
Because The Commons resides in a zoning overlay district with specific conditions, a two-thirds majority approval is required at Town Meeting next month for the plan to go forward. The Planning Board will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, Feb. 28 at 7 p.m. via Zoom. The agenda and Zoom link will be posted on the Planning Board schedule page. There will also be information sessions in the Lincoln Public Library’s Tarbell Room on Thursday, March 2 from 6–8 p.m. and two sessions on Thursday, March 9 (2–4 p.m. and 6–8 p.m.)
Owner’s representative OnePoint Partners submitted a detailed proposal to the Planning Board on February 6 that calls for 32 new apartments in the existing Flint and Russell buildings and eight freestanding and attached cottages at various locations on the campus. Six of the 11 new units in the Flint building would be designated as affordable housing to be rented at the 80% area median income threshold, increasing the total number of affordable units at The Commons to 14.
The plan also calls for a net addition of 56 parking spaces — 82 new surface spaces at cottages and 18 new garage spaces minus 44 spaces removed for construction. The Commons currently has 259 total units, which includes 90 units in the assisted living/memory care/skilled nursing area that opened in 2016. The current proposal “is the final phase of the complete build out of the Commons,” said Sarah Laffey, partner at OnePoint Partners.
“I think we’re all terribly disappointed. It was like a coup,” said David Levington, a resident at The Commons. “They’re adding more units so we’ll have more people but no more facilities,” he added, saying there already isn’t enough gathering and activity space — a concern expressed by other residents as well. “They’re asking us to spend more time in our rooms.”
“NELPC [New England Life Plan Communities, owners of The Commons] and the onsite management team of The Commons is working closely with the resident council and ensuring that residents’ questions and concerns are addressed,” Laffey said.
Rey LeBlanc, executive director at The Commons, was away and unavailable for comment this week. Several residents who praised his work noted that he was “in a difficult position” as the liaison between residents and the owners of the complex since the expansion was announced.
Benchmark Senior Living and a private equity firm sold The Commons in 2021 to NELPC, a nonprofit entity. The Groves in Lincoln, as it was called when it opened in 2010, was owned by the New England Deaconess Association and Masonic Health Systems of Massachusetts but had an occupancy rate of only 59% in 2013, when it filed for bankruptcy after defaulting on payment of $88.4 million in tax-exempt bonds.
“While the Commons currently operates profitably, the expansion will provide further economies of scale by spreading operating costs over a greater number of units, which should ultimately serve to increase the financial stability of the community,” Laffey said. “As a not-for-profit, the improved financial benefit of this expansion will only serve to shore up The Commons’ own financial resources and strengthen its own financial condition and will not inure to the benefit of an outside owner or investor.”
When NELPC became the owner, it entered into a long-term agreement with Benchmark Senior Living whereby Benchmark would continue in its role as the day-to-day manager of the operation of the Commons.
Lincoln will earn $1.33 million in property taxes from The Commons (Lincoln’s single largest taxpayer) on an assessed value of $92.8 million in fiscal 2023. In fiscal 2022, the assessed value of its property accounted for about 4% of the town’s total, according to the Assessor’s Office. Laffey said it was still unclear how much more tax money the town could expect from the expansion, though a coUrbanize website devoted to the project says projections show a net benefit for the town of more than $200,000 annually. Despite its not-for-profit status, The Commons will continue to pay property taxes, she added.
Voters must approve both the development plan and the amended North-Lincoln Planned Development District at Town Meeting, but the project also needs a signoff from the Planning Board, the Historic Commission (for demolition of a vacant house on the property), the Conservation Commission (to ensure compliance with wetlands laws), and the MassDEP (for approval of a groundwater discharge permit).
Assuming all the permits are acquired, it’s still unknown at this point when construction might take, how long it will last, or whether it will be done in stages or all at once, Laffey said.
The Hanscom Field expansion area is outlined in red. Lincoln’s approximate town border is indicated by the green dashed line.
Local officials and organizations are quickly rallying to fight a proposal that would add about 408,000 square feet of new hangar space and reconfigure a taxiway to accommodate larger aircraft at Hanscom Field.
At a February 6 public forum, the possibility of a “fuel farm” was also mentioned, according to the Bedford Citizen. The online meeting, which drew dozens of residents from area towns hosted by the office of the Massachusetts Environmental Policy Act (MEPA), took place just eight days before the public comment period closes.
The Lincoln Select Board held a special meeting on February 10 to discuss a letter in opposition to the project. Mothers Out Front and the Hanscom Field Advisory Committee (HFAC) have also written letters against the idea, and other Lincoln groups such as the Green Energy Committee and the Planning Board are also expected to weigh in.
State Sen. Mike Barrett, a key climate activist in the state legislature whose district includes the four Hanscom towns, also spoke out at the MEPA forum, the Bedford Citizen article said. “It is striking that in the middle of our attempt as a state to deal with an existential crisis, Massport is intent on building its private jet business,” he said.
“There is a climate change emergency and every effort must be made to phase out and not expand use of fossil fuels,” the HFAC noted in a letter to MEPA.
Mothers Out Front claimed that paving and construction will lead to more stormwater runoff, fewer carbon-storing plants, and stress to wildlife, wrote. “We believe [the proposal] represents an example of profits over people,” they wrote.
The project’s proponents say that additional hangar space will reduce the need for “ferry flights” to and from full Hanscom hangars to other storage areas, but the idea that “adding 90 football fields worth of space would reduce emissions from aircraft struck me as hard to believe,” said Select Board member Jim Hutchinson at Friday’s meeting.
The draft letter, which will go out early this week, listed 10 specific requests and areas of concern about the project. It asked for more information on current and projected traffic of both aircraft and ground vehicles at Hanscom Field, data on ferry flight frequency, destinations, and emissions; the flight paths, maximum size, and noise profiles of aircraft that an expanded airfield could accommodate; and details on the fuel farm, including the amount of fuel to be stored, the size and number of vehicles that would transport it, and how potential fuel spills will be handled.
The pandemic put a dent in many businesses, but jet operations at Hanscom are actually up by 19% since 2019, Massport noted at an October 20, 2022 meeting (total operations are down by 6% as recreational and pilot training operations continue to decline).
In one sign of the strength of the private jet business at Hanscom, Magellan Jets recently opened a dedicated passenger area in one of the airfield’s buildings. Business travel dropped during Covid-19 but private flights for leisure travel mostly made up for it; the pandemic “really opened everyone’s eyes to what’s available domestically” for private travel, said Anthony Tivnan, president of Magellan, whose fees start at $6,900 per hour for use of one of its eight-passenger planes.
“This is not about military flights that are defending our country, or commercial aviation — this is about private jets getting people to where they want to go,” Select Board member Jennifer Glass said.
“I feel like bigger things were planned that was being addressed at that listening session,” resident Miriam Stason said at the elect board meeting. Hutchinson agreed, saying, “Massport doesn’t usually make these plans without a bigger picture in mind.”
Another worry: larger and more frequent flights may involve planes taking off and landing at Hanscom at night. The fine for doing so is just $400, and it’s not legally possible to increase that amount.
Officials also noted that Hanscom expansion will most directly affect the environmental justice community in north Lincoln, which includes the Battle Road Farm development, where 48 of 120 units are designated as affordable housing.
Massport tried to expand Hanscom back in the mid-2000s, but cooperation among the four towns helped defeat that effort, said Sara Mattes, who was a Board of Selectmen member at the time. “We have to look at what worked and what didn’t work” from that time, she said. “This is just round one of a long trench warfare.”
(Editor’s note: This was originally posted on February 6 but disappeared due a server hiccup.)
140 Lincoln Rd., Unit 11 — Catherine Dyl to Dilla Tingley for $485,000 (December 28)
2 Bedford Rd. — Geraldine H. Lattimore Trust to Ariane Liazos Revocable Trust for $955,000 (December 18)
11 Oak Meadow — Mark Hurrie to john and Mary Wakeman for $1,475,000 (December 15)
259 Old Concord Rd. — Sandra N. Bradlee Trust to Lakeside Trust for $3,000,000 (December 15)
133 Lincoln Rd. — Martin J. Powers Trust to Thomas Bray and Linda Micu for $700,000 (December 15)
29 Birchwood Lane — Karen M. Moss to Lloyd and Ann Rapoport for $855,000 (December 8)
167 Lexington Rd. — Constitution Properties LLC to Joseph and Meghan Sullivan for $1,200,000 (December 5)
124 Lexington Rd. — James F. Cunningham trust to Lachezar Ranchev and Maya Gotova for $900,000 (December 5)
0 Cambridge Turnpike and 3 Red Maple Lane — Brian P. Cassidy Trust to Vladimir Trostteanetchi and Liubov Nedzelscaia for a total of $495,000 (December 1)
Some of the Battle Road Farm condominiums near Hanscom Field.
The owners of the Battle Road Farm condos are facing a big financial hit to repair or replace its septic treatment plant this summer. The cost to replace the facility, which is more than 30 years old, and will be spread across the 120 units (48 of which are affordable), is estimated at $1.6–$2.1 million, according to Debra Daugherty of the development’s Board of Trustees.
The formula to determine each unit’s share of the cost is the same for all units based mostly on their “beneficial interest in the condo property,” which relates mainly to the size of the unit, according to Marcia Good, senior property manager at First Realty Management, which manages the development.
“Battle Road Farm’s on-site septic treatment facility is considered failing and the Mass. Department of Environmental Protection has ordered it repaired or replaced as soon as possible,” Good said. A bank loan for either $1 million or $1.1 million will cover the cost, and “the Board of Trustees will make a decision on the project scope soon,” Good said. “Battle Road Farm has maintained a significant reserve fund; however, it is not unusual for condo communities to make special assessments to cover major capital projects as properties age.”
All owners were first told that they would have to come up with an initial payment of $4,500 by March 1, but faced with the resulting outcry, the Board of Trustees approved a new plan offered by the management company. Owners may now choose to make a lump-sum interest-free payment of approximately $20,000 on that day, or pay in monthly installments (including interest) over 11 years starting on July 1. The specific loan payment amounts are not yet finalized, she said. Those who opt for the installment plan will receive a revised payment schedule in years nine, 10, and 11 because the last three years of loan are variable interest rates.
The project is creating a crisis for owners of affordable units. Many of them bought their homes decades ago and are now retired and living on fixed incomes, but property taxes and regular condo fees keep rising. And because those units have deed restrictions, any owner who wants to sell or mortgage their property must do so in cooperation with the state Department of Housing and Community Development, which determines the asking price.
“A lot of us can’t do that. I can’t do that,” said condo owner Leslie Kilgore, 75, a retired teacher in the Arlington schools who bought her unit in 1999. “I might have to go back to [substitute teaching]. I’m basically hanging on and hoping that something will come through.”
The Lincoln Foundation has already awarded grants to 17 owners of affordable units and is conducting a fundraising campaign (its first since 2009) to help others both this year and into the future. Battle Road Farm residents have also approached the Council on Aging and Human Development and the St. Vincent de Paul Society of Lincoln and Weston for help.
The Lincoln Foundation is a private nonprofit 501(c)(3) entity that was created in 1968 to help preserve a diverse stock of housing in town. It partnered with the Massachusetts Housing Finance Authority in 1973 to develop Lincoln Woods and with a private developer to create the homeownership program at Battle Road Farm starting in 1990. More recently, the foundation has facilitated the resale of affordable deed restricted homes, and it’s also made a handful of home improvement grants to affordable housing owners at Battle Road Farm and Minuteman Commons.
After a flyer was recently mailed to all Lincoln residents about the issue, several donations have already come in, “and that’s encouraging,” said Terri Morgan, the organization’s president. To learn more and donate to the “Bridge the Gap” campaign, click here.
First Realty Management, which has managed Battle Road Farm since 2004, “has worked diligently and collaboratively with the Board of Trustees on the project plans and financial options for the septic treatment system” Good said. “Our property management team is cognizant of the financial impact such projects have on condominium owners and has worked to minimize the impact wherever possible in our advisory role with the board.”
241 Aspen Circle — Maureen Harmonay to Vitaly Huruev for $795,000 (November 30)
68 Winter St. — Mary Lou P. Gauvin Trust to Yi Luo and Qing Gao for $1,220,000 (November 28)
8 Linway Rd. — Christopher Fasciano to Corey and Nicole Ciullo for $1,475,000 (November 18)
319 South Great Rd. — Jeanne Benton to William and Audrey O’Shaughnessy for $1,415,000 (November 8)
166 Tower Rd. — Richard J. Gregory Trust to [names withheld at editor’s discretion] for $2,265,000 (October 31)
35 North Great Rd. — Rosalind Brooks Stowe to the Maharishi Foundation for $2,000,000 (October 28)
34 Laurel Drive — Sophie Freud to Andrew and Alexandra Reiter for $1,570,000 (October 7)
7 Oakdale Lane — William D. Lewis to [names withheld at editor’s discretion] for $1,695,000 (October 6)
Lincolnites will have a chance to vote on two bylaw changes — one to South Lincoln commercial zoning and the other to accessory apartment rules — at the annual Town Meeting in March. The Planning Board presented the proposals on the second night of Lincoln’s State of the Town meeting on November 15.
Surveys have shown “overwhelming support for enhancing commercial viability” in the South Lincoln village area, and the 2009 long-range plan called for a “vibrant” village center, “but we don’t think anyone would use the word vibrant to describe the area,” Planning Board Chair Robert Domnitz said. The Housing Choice Act will also require the town to allow denser housing within half a mile of the train station. And while residents and the board support mixed-use development, the current zoning rules make that difficult. Developers have been “discouraged by the complex procedures laid out in our zoning bylaw,” he said.
The village area currently includes two business zones: B1 (the mall plus a few properties south of Lincoln Road) and B2 (an area west of the tracks stretching from Doherty’s Garage to the Department of Public Works), but they have different emphases. B1 allows retail and professional business by right, but not residences. B2 allows single-family and limited multifamily housing by right, but most new business uses require a special permit from the Planning Board and a variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Even then, the permit must be renewed periodically and can’t be transferred to a new owner when the property is sold.
The Planning Board is considering two options: dropping the special permit requirement for uses in the B2 zone that are allowed by right in B1, or somehow merging the two zones to “create a more holistic vision of a village center,” Domnitz said. The overarching goal is to encourage mixed use with a higher residential density while preserving the character of the village center area.
A broader proposal to rezone the village area stirred up strong opposition in 2019, especially from residents living in condos and apartments on Ridge Road. In contrast this time, zoning in all the nearby residential areas “are outside the scope of our effort,” Domnitz said.
The second proposed zoning change would encourage more accessory apartments by streamlining the need for property owners to get approval from both the Planning Board of the ZBA if the proposed accessory apartment is part of the main dwelling. The building inspector would be empowered to approve any construction after ensuring plans conform to the existing rules on proportional size of the apartment, having a separate entrance and dedicated parking space, etc.
If the apartment is to be a separate building on the property, the applicant would still have to get a permit from the ZBA but can bypass the Planning Board. Owners could charge rent but could not “condo-ize” the accessory apartment; it would have to remain legally part of the primary residence.
Voters approved a previous set of changes to accessory apartment rules by razor-thin margins in 2021.
The goal for both measures is to “streamline regulations and procedures that provide no benefit to the town and needlessly burden property owners, Domnitz said.
248 Lincoln Rd. — Badri Raghavan Trust to Adam McDermott and Melissa Deck for $1,450,000 (August 25)
167 Lexington Rd. — Sylvia A. Lafauci Trust to Constitution Properties LLC for $975,000 (August 10)
281 South Great Rd. — Elizabeth Cherniack to Savanna Brewer and Rishi Paramar for $685,000 (August 8)
7 Oak Meadow Rd. — Maria Ansin to Vandana Palreddy for $1,697,000 (August 5)
54 Bedford Rd. — Rand Alexander to Jeanna Simeone and Heather Quadir for $2,160,000 (August 3)
140 Lincoln Rd. — Frances Doyle to Judith Curtin for $480,000 (August 3)
8-3 Ridge Rd. — Julianne Etcheverry to Daniel Abate for $455,000 (August 1)