• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscriptions
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Issues
    • Submit your work

land use

Contentious HCA rezoning measure squeaks by, 52%–48%

March 25, 2024

At one of the longest and most controversial Town Meetings in recent history, voters on March 23 narrowly approved the Housing Choice Act zoning amendments by a margin of 52% to 48%. The community center funding measure, which needed a two-thirds majority, was approved easily.

Knowing that the meeting would be heavily attended, town officials had plenty of extra volunteers on hand to check in residents starting at 8 a.m. for the 9:30 meeting, and to count standing votes. Both the Todd Auditorium/Lecture Hall and the Reed Gym were at full capacity, with even more people in the Learning Commons. Before the meeting could start, town counsel Joel Bard had to be escorted in by police after he got stuck in the traffic jam of cars trying to park on campus, and an unknown number of residents were reportedly turned away by police and advised to park at Town Hall or Donelan’s. Some braved the walk in heavy rain and others didn’t.

The rezoning issue, already the topic of hot debate for the last several months, started Saturday with a bombshell right off the bat when Michele Barnes of the Rural Land Foundation introduced an amendment from the floor that was intended to address concerns that housing density at the mall would be too high under the revised bylaw. Their proposed changes to the bylaw wording endorsed by the Planning Board on February 26 by a 3-2 vote:

  • Reduce the maximum housing density in the village center subdistrict that includes the mall from 25 units per acre to 15.
  • To compensate, increase the maximum density of the Lincoln Woods subdistrict from eight to 10 units per acre, and the Lincoln Road/Lewis Street subdistrict from 11 to 12.
  • Strike the section (12.9.2.3.a.10) that would allow the Planning Board to reduce the required percentage of commercial use at the mall from 33 percent by special permit if that ratio were shown to be incompatible with “economic and market conditions.”

The amendment thus made “33 percent commercial” an inviolable minimum unless residents approve a further change in zoning language at a future Town Meeting.

The proposal was first discussed publicly at a Housing Choice Act Working Group on the morning of March 14. At that meeting, Director of Planning and Land Use Paula Vaughn-MacKenzie told the group that Ephraim Flint and Lynn DeLisi, the Planning Board members who cast the two “nay” votes on February 26, were planning to introduce the amendment on the floor of Town Meeting.

“In anticipation of a possible amendment,” planning consultant Utile was asked to “develop two alternatives” that would meet the state’s HCA requirements, and the bylaw with Saturday’s amendment passed muster, Planning Board Chair Margaret Olson said.

Many unhappy with last-minute amendment

“This is just off-the-charts bizarre,” said Bob Domnitz. “In the 15 years I was on the Planning Board, we always recommended that zoning not be created on the floor of Town Meeting.” The changes should have been incorporated before the February 20 public hearing, he added, “and I think it’s further evidence that the main motion and amendment are not ready for this town.”

“There’s no way I can really understand and vote intelligently and with full knowledge of what this means,” another resident said.

Although the amendment was reportedly devised by DeLisi and Flint, they did not present a united front in the discussion. “I’m very happy to see that Michelle brought this forth,” said DeLisi. “I love this amendment — I think it’s a great compromise.” Flint was less sanguine. “What I’ve heard this morning is for the most part a very positive step forward… but I agree with Bob that we are not going to get this right on the floor of the meeting,” he said.

The amendment “is not a major change” for the Lincoln Woods and Lincoln Road subdistricts and it “addresses people’s greatest concerns” about commercial space at the mall, said Jonathan Soo, a leader of a citizens’ group pushing for passage. “We can’t delay the healing that this town desperately needs,” he said. 

“Settling the matter now is far preferable to another nine months of arguing about what to do,” agreed Alex Chatfield.

Desire for closure prevails

On Saturday, voters approved the amendment by a vote of 603-216 (74% to 26%), clearing the required two-thirds majority. But more impassioned discussion of the main motion followed.

Speakers protested that the HCAWG did not include any members who live in the subdistricts targeted for rezoning (although the group was appointed before any specific parcels had been identified), and that Flint and DeLisi were denied permission on March 20 by Town Moderator Sarah Cannon Holden to speak from the podium and use slides. Olson did, however, read the letter that the pair submitted to their fellow Planning Board members on February 26.

“The process has not provided a fair and balanced view of this controversial topic,” Sherry Haydock said. “Voting no is a chance for all voices to be heard… with equal representation and inclusivity,” she said to loud cheering.

But others said that defeating the measure vote would do far more harm than good. Referring to an earlier comment that the town is in crisis and needs “family therapy,” HCAWG member Terri Perlmutter said, “the notion that as a family we’ll come together where everyone suddenly agrees is naive. Family therapy takes years and mayne 50 percent of the time it’s successful. I would remind people to not let the perfect be the enemy of the good.”

“There’s no way to know if that process would be less divisive or more divisive, or produce a compromise with more support or less support,” Soo said. Town officials, staff, and volunteers have borne the brunt of the battle, he added, “and they won’t say it publicly, but I will — they have been treated absolutely horribly. We cannot go forward and subject them and the rest of the town to another nine months of this on the mere wish that we might be able to come up with something better. Voting no would have a real cost to our town… and that makes me worry much more for Lincoln’s future than any zoning law.”

Category: land use, South Lincoln/HCA* 3 Comments

HCAWG, RLF were surprised by rumored amendment to zoning motion

March 25, 2024

Lincoln’s four Housing Choice Act subdistricts.

The Housing Choice Act Working Group first learned on the morning of March 14 that an amendment to the rezoning motion would be proposed on the floor of Town Meeting to reduce the density of allowed housing at the mall. Group members at that morning meeting (which the Lincoln Squirrel did not attend but watched the recording on March 24) were clearly surprised and not altogether pleased by the news. 

Paula Vaughn-MacKenzie told the group that Planning Board members Lynn DeLisi and Ephraim Flint, who had already voted against endorsing the rezoning measure on February 26, planned to offer the amendment. While anyone (including a member of the Planning Board) is free to propose an amendment on the floor of Town Meeting, “I personally feel it’s really inappropriate, because people attended that [February 20] public hearing knowing that that was the official moment for the Planning Board to go forward. It seems very problematic now to undermine that public process,” Andrew Glass said.

“Nobody’s really going to understand what they’re approving or not approving,” Terri Perlmutter said.

“The RLF [Rural Land Foundation, which owns the mall] hasn’t had a chance to think this through and see how much it would affect their interests at the mall,” said Gary Taylor, who sits on both HCAWG and the Planning Board. “Somebody’s certainly going to ask what the RLF thinks about the modification… It just troubles me that we would, out of the public process, change the proposal that’s been out there for a long time.

HCAWG members initially thought that the full board — which had already written, edited, and voted on the measure — would be able to discuss the matter at its upcoming meeting on March 19. Given its 3-2 vote on February 26, “is the Planning Board going to say they’re not in favor of this?” HCAWG member Terri Perlmutter said.

“I think we will be asked to endorse it,” Taylor said.

But later in the meeting, Glass said, “I certainly come down thinking the Planning Board should not be re-voting anything.” 

Vaughn-MacKenzie initially said the Planning Board would discuss the amendment at its March 19 and that the agenda for that meeting had not yet been posted, although the town calendar web page indicates it was in fact posted on February 27. She later acknowledged the concerns about whether the board should discuss it before Town Meeting and said she would convey HCAWG’s recommendation that it not do so.

RLF caught in a bind

It quickly became clear that the RLF would be forced to support the amendment, even without the backing of the Planning Board. “In my opinion, it’s whether the RLF is willing to do this for unity or not. This is all on us — this is no one else,” said HCAWG member Geoff McGean, the organization’s executive director. “I think it would be strange for the RLF to have one opinion and the working group to have another.”

However, not having any public input from the Planning Board “puts RLF in a really difficult position,” McGean added. “It’ll just create chaos on the floor of Town Meeting… it would be helpful to know if the board supports this amendment or not.”

It’s unclear exactly when the amendment went from being Flint and DeLisi’s proposal to the RLF’s. Planning Board Chair Margaret Olson said in an email to the Lincoln Squirrel on March 24 that she heard on March 22 from “multiple parties, including the RLF, that they would be making an amendment… I wasn’t clear on what exactly they were contemplating, which is why I asked Paula to prepare [motion text for] both 15 units per acre and 20 units per acre at the mall… I did not want Utile (who was present at Town Meeting) to try to validate a density amendment on the fly.”

Olson also said that she’d heard from several people on both sides of the Article 3 issue that “for the board to be making substantive changes to the proposed bylaw a few days before Town Meeting was not good practice.” While all this was going on, she was also helping resident Barbara Peskin revise the wording for Article 28, which called for a policy that requires 14 days’ notice on proposed zoning density changes.

“Not only was the short notice on a density change an issue, but our direction from the Special Town Meeting in December was Option C, not a modified Option C. Much as I would have liked to unite the board behind a modified bylaw, I reluctantly concluded that Barbara and others were right — we should not do it,” Olson said. 

Later on March 14, HCAWG held its final public forum on the proposed bylaw printed in the Town Meeting warrant, but the Flynn-DeLisi amendment was not mentioned. No agenda was posted for that event because “we don’t publish agendas for the forums. The purpose is to answer as many questions about the bylaw as possible,” HCAWG’s Jennifer Glass said the previous day in answer to a query from the Squirrel.

Category: land use, South Lincoln/HCA* 6 Comments

Citizens’ petitions focus on legal notices, notification of rezoning discussions

March 6, 2024

Two citizen’s petitions will be presented for a vote at the March 23 Town Meeting, one on town requirements for placing legal notices and the other asking the town to provide individual notices to affected residents in advance about discussions on proposed zoning changes.

Towns and other entities are required by state law to put paid legal notices in newspapers about things like public hearings, requests for proposals for construction projects, etc. However, as currently written, the law says those notices must go in a actual newspaper; publishing them in a digital-only news site is allowed as well, but does not by itself satisfy the legal requirement. Many local papers in Massachusetts discontinued their print editions in 2022 and merged some remaining publications, so towns are now forced to do business with the few print newspapers that are left, and those papers have very few readers in the towns they purport to cover.

Article 27, proposed by Lincoln Squirrel editor Alice Waugh, asks the Select Board to petition the state legislature for special legislation to allow Lincoln to satisfy requirements for legal notices by allowing the publication of those notices in local digital newspapers, print media, or both. Since print newspapers generally charge more than digital news sites for advertising, this would save the town money while also providing another revenue stream for the Squirrel.

Several other towns have approved similar citizen’s petitions: Arlington (YourArlington), Bedford (Bedford Citizen), and Franklin (Franklin Observer). State Rep. and Assistant Majority Leader Alice Peisch, who represents part of Lincoln, has also filed a bill (H.2098) that would accomplish the same thing on a statewide level by changing the statute. The Select Board endorsed the measure at its March 4 meeting.

Rezoning discussions

If approved, Article 28 would require town boards, sanctioned groups and committees proposing rezoning of an existing district to notify by mail each property owner, resident, and abutter in the area of rezoning 14 days prior to their first public meeting at which the zoning change would be discussed. Notices of subsequent meetings where a rezoning decision may be voted on would also be required.

The notice would outline the parameters of the existing district’s zoning along with the proposed changes. “It would be different from and in addition to any general information mailing because of the detail it would include,” says the warrant article proposed by Barbara Peskin.

Currently, the town disseminates townwide notices of pending zoning changes via meeting agendas, mailings. and usually neighborhood meetings. When an individual parcel is being considered for a special permit from the Planning Board or a variance by the Zoning Board of Appeals, abutting property owners must also be notified by mail.

The Select Board declined to take a position on the measure this week, saying it needed input from the Planning Board first. When asked why the current notification measures were not sufficient, Peskin said that “many of them [residents whose property would be directly affected by proposed HCA rezoning] found out after the State of the Town that it was going to be considered.”

Category: land use Leave a Comment

New RLF proposal shows larger and fewer housing units

March 3, 2024

The latest iteration of early plans for developing the mall now includes fewer but larger apartments after residents said at a forum in January that the units ranging from 600 to 800 square feet were too small.

At a February 29 public forum, the Rural Land Foundation, which owns the mall, proposed 40 housing units (down from the previous 47), with one- and two-bedroom units of 708 to 1,261 square feet as well as two studios at 513 and 536 square feet as sketched out by Union Architects (see below). Ten percent of the rental units would be designated as affordable. The bank building and the Something Special building would be demolished and rebuilt while the Donelan’s and the post office/restaurant building remain untouched in this phase.

To accommodate Donelan’s, the main parking lot won’t be disrupted during construction. Twisted Tree could operate out of a food truck and other tenants might be able to use temporary trailers or take advantage of phased construction, said RLF Executive Director Geoff McGean.

As in the past, residents at the meeting worried about the town losing control of what gets built on the property if it’s eventually sold to a developer. Current plans call for the RLF to offer a ground lease. “I think we would have a lot of say [in lease terms controlling what can be built] and I don’t say that lightly — that would be critical,” McGean said. Also critical: passage of the HCA rezoning measure at Town Meeting so the RLF can start working with designers, lenders, town officials and others.

“From our perspective, we’ve got a really long process ahead of us and we need to get going,” McGean said. “There isn’t a crisis today, but we feel there will be.”

The presentation also included a history of the mall and sketches of parking and traffic circulation, as well as the two design concepts (traditional and modern) for the buildings that were shown in January. There are no plans for an underground or above-ground parking structure, McGean said. There also won’t be a traffic study until we have “much more of a definitive plan,” he added.

Click images below for larger versions with captions.

mall-floor1
mall-floor2
mall-floor3
mall-parking

Category: land use, South Lincoln/HCA* 1 Comment

Final bylaw includes adjustments for affordability and commercial use

February 29, 2024

The multifamily and mixed-use overlay zoning map approved by the Planning Board. Click to enlarge.

The HCA zoning bylaw amendment approved on February 26 by the Planning Board includes changes to maximize housing affordability and to strictly limit the ability of an owner to reduce the amount of commercial space in the mixed-use subdistrict.

Going into the meeting, the draft required 10% of multifamily housing units to be affordable. This was because the state would not allow Lincoln to specify its usual 15% minimum unless the town could show in a feasibility study (which it was not able to do) that that higher ratio would be economically viable.

But the board turned around the burden of proof. Section 12.9.3.2 of the final bylaw now says that 15% will be required unless the state Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities determines in writing that it is not feasible, and then 10% will be required. “This will allow the town to pursue the 15% with EOHLC without having to go back to Town Meeting to change the bylaw to 15%,” Director of Planning and Land Use Paula Vaughn MacKenzie explained on February 29.

Commercial space

Section 12.9.2.3 (part a.10) still says that a minimum of 33% of the gross floor area of all buildings on the lot must be dedicated to commercial use and that the Planning Board may reduce the required percentage of commercial uses by Special Permit “upon a finding that economic and market conditions do not support the required amount of commercial space.”

However, the board added this to the paragraph:

“To support such a finding, the applicant must provide documentation of significant periods of vacancy or non-payment of rent, demonstrate reasonable efforts of marketing such space, and present a report by a qualified independent real estate marketing consultant. The Town may also conduct its own third-party assessment paid for by the applicant pursuant to MGL, c. 44 s. 53G.”

The amended bylaw will go before voters at he March 23 Annal Town Meeting.

Category: land use, South Lincoln/HCA* Leave a Comment

Hanscom developer offers plan details, answers questions

February 22, 2024

The Hanscom Field expansion area is outlined in red. Lincoln’s approximate town border to the south is indicated by the green dashed line.

North Airfield Ventures offered details of its plan to greatly enlarge hangar space at Hanscom Field to the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission on February 20. It was the first of several public sessions scheduled before developers file their environmental impact statement next month, according to a February 21 story in the Bedford Citizen.

While the parcel under consideration lies in the town of Bedford, an expansion of the airport’s capacity will increase air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions — an argument cited by opponents including Stop Private Jet Expansion as well as local and state officials including the Lincoln Select Board.

The project’s proponents say that additional hangar space will reduce the need for “ferry flights” to and from full Hanscom hangars to other storage areas, but the idea that “adding 90 football fields worth of space would reduce emissions from aircraft struck me as hard to believe,” Select Board member Jim Hutchinson said in February 2023.

Four 20,000-gallon jet fuel tanks and one 5,000-gallon tank for aviation gas are planned. Fuel deliveries are expected once or twice a day in 10,000-gallon tank trucks, the Bedford Citizen article notes. Although the plan has been scaled down from 27 to 17 hangars, the total size will remain at around 495,000 square feet, the article added.

The environmental review is not a permitting process. Under state law, once the impact report is submitted, there will be a 30-day comment period. If the content is not accepted by the Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, the developers must prepare a supplemental report, the Bedford Citizen explained in an earlier article.

Category: land use 1 Comment

Property sales in October 2023

December 14, 2023

150 Lincoln Rd. — Prince Teabo to Wombat Real Estate Invest LLC for $801,000 (October 31)

25B South Commons — Brett Cramp to Merna Sorial and Marcus Luke for $272,000 (October 31)

13 Oak Meadow Rd. — Debra Peattie to Christopher Hallett and Cara Slaby for $1,400,000 (October 28)

172 Bedford Rd. — Debra Orr Trust to Michael Sonier Revocable Trust for $1,499,000 (October 27)

10 Hiddenwood Path — Edward F. Koehler Trust to Wonho and Youngsheen Jhe for $790,000 (October 19)

11A South Commons — Marisa Gregg to Judith Wong for $551,000 (October 18)

2 Concord Rd. — Andrew H. David Trust to Walden Woods Project for $1,300,000 (October 17)

20R Indian Camp Lane — Gary Davis Trust to Abbie Paley and Jatinder Gill for $700,000 (October 16)

19 Conant Rd. — Nancy M. Harris Trust to Dudley Hollow LLC for $1,355,000 (October 10)

91 Weston Rd. — 91 Weston Rd. Realty Trust to 91 Weston Rd. Realty LLC for $1,775,000 (October 5)

39 Old Sudbury Rd. — David R.W. Harris Trust to Manley B. Boyce II Trust and Karen K. Boyce Trust for $850,000 (October 2)

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Property sales in September 2023

December 10, 2023

181 Bedford Rd. — Benjamin Shiller to James and Caroline Gately for $1,415,000 (September 20)

203 Concord Rd. — Laurence D. Herthel Trust to  Mary Garlock Living Trust for $675,000 (September 6)

35 Sandy Pond Rd. — Richard Chesworth to Marc Bazin and Jennifer Lachey for $2,500,000 (September 1)

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Educational pavilion planned for Codman Community Farms

November 1, 2023

An architect’s drawing of the side view of the pavilion.

Codman Community Farms plans to build an open-air educational pavilion as a precursor to a future project to install a fire suppression system in the main barn.

The three-season pavilion will serve as an educational space for workshops, classes, demonstrations, and small gatherings. The farm, which recently created a new staff position to grow its educational and community outreach, has hosted dozens of schools and corporate groups, and volunteers. Some of those events have included demonstrations to teach farming techniques to Boston-based nonprofit farming organizations and others.

“Teaching agriculture may start with a class discussion or a demonstration before heading to the fields. Thus, agriculture work takes place in the fields and in the classroom,” the farm board wrote in a narrative describing the project.

A map showing the location of the educational pavilion (click image to enlarge).

The one-story, 20-by-40-foot educational pavilion will go on the site of the maple sugar shack, which will be relocated to another location on the farm. It won’t house animals or equipment but it will have a commercial-grade pizza oven for events using Codman ingredients. “It could be used after a canning class when participants could pick their own tomatoes, peppers and onions, and create a pizza of their own making,” according to the narrative. A deck on the north side will offer views of grazing livestock as well as additional gathering space.

“I think it’s a great addition and supports a very important function of Codman,” Planning Board member Ephraim Flint said when the board approved the project on October 24. The plan has also gotten the OK from the Conservation Commission, Historical Commission, and Select Board and just needs a building permit to start construction. CCF is funding the project in full.

Over the years, CCF has hosted gatherings in the main barn, but this can’t continue — the town building inspector and fire chief have told them they can’t have any more activities in that space without a fire suppression system, CCF farmer Pete Lowy told the Select Board on October 30. The farm has a preliminary design for the system, which involves building a small heated room in addition to sprinkler plumbing and could cost anywhere from $250,000 to $500,000, he said.

CCF will ask voters at Town Meeting in March to help pay for the fire suppression system, though who will pay how much is yet to be determined; Select Board members noted that Community Preservation Act funds helped pay for the farm’s recent driveway project at the farm, but the sprinkler system is a code-mandated improvement in a public building, so there’s an argument for the town contributing a portion of the cost.

Category: agriculture and flora, land use 1 Comment

Property sales in August 2023

October 29, 2023

71 Sandy Pond Rd. — Jamie N. Atkins Trust to Jisuo Jiang and Yangcai Li for $1,598,000 (August 29)

11 Farrar Rd. — Norma Barkamian to Marlen Morgus and Benjamin Bolotin for $1,760,000 (August 23)

73 Old County Rd. — Janna P.Hadley Trust to Dabid Barron and Kristin Budde for $900,000 (August 7)

66 and 70 Davison Dr. — Seventy Plus LLC to Hallie Ransone for $2,180,000 (August 4)

96 Page Rd. — David Kahn to Yaojun Li and Xin Guo for $1,550,000 (August 1)

 

Category: land use Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 35
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Upcoming Events

Jun 14
4:30 pm - 7:00 pm

Codman Campout and Chili Night

Jun 21
8:30 am - 12:00 pm

Lincoln Kids Triathlon

View Calendar

Recent Posts

  • News acorns May 29, 2025
  • My Turn: Details on the North Lincoln Overlay District May 29, 2025
  • Legal notice: Zoning Board of Appeals hearing May 29, 2025
  • My Turn: Nature Link abutters have been “systematically excluded” May 29, 2025
  • Legal notice: HDC public hearing (5 Hawk Hill) May 29, 2025

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2025 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.