• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscription Info
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Previous Issues
    • Submit Your Work
    • Subscribe/Donate

government

Letter to the editor: appeals court hearing “a breath of fresh air”

February 8, 2017

letter

To the editor:

No matter what side you have been on during the Presidential election and thereafter, it has been and continues to be a rough ride. Each side has its talking points which are calculated to generate political support, whether they are true or not. Such is the nature of the political thicket. It has been this way since the founding of the country.

This past Tuesday evening, I listened to a different type of conversation; the oral argument in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals about the President’s Executive Order on immigration. Although many may say “how boring,” it was refreshing and instructive. It showed how facts, although stubborn things, do exist and remain critical to the proper functioning of the nation. It again demonstrated that truth is a core value of the nation. Today’s political discourse, like that of the past, has tried to minimize the importance of facts and truth in a quest for political power. However, the judicial discourse during the argument reminded us that these values are central to the proper functioning of our democracy.

Members of the executive and legislative branches of the government can say virtually anything they want to advance their agenda. However, lawyers in court have the obligation to the court to state the facts and truth as shown by the record before the court. On numerous occasions, the three judges on the appellate panel grilled both sides on what the record actually showed and the lawyers were careful to only represent what it did show.

What a breath of fresh air. No “alternative facts”; no making up the facts to score political points (e.g., the “Bowling Green Massacre”, the largest crowd to attend an Inauguration or Democratic overreaching). Instead of hyperbole and showmanship, you had reason.

I am not suggesting that the judicial system is beyond criticism. It is also political in the sense that the President appoints federal judges and it is expected that his appointments will share his judicial philosophy. This is part of our political system. This is why there are supreme battles over appointments to the Supreme Court. Some judges may be what has been described as “politicians in black robes,” but the huge majority take their judicial responsibilities extremely seriously. Different judges in a case will reach different conclusions, not because some are absolutely right and the others are absolutely wrong, but because sometimes reason exists on both sides in our constitutional democracy.

Obviously, that political thicket cannot and should not operate like a court of law. We all need to fight for what we believe. However, when political excesses create a constitutional or legal mess, it is reassuring to know that there is a branch of government where facts, truth and reason still matter. So when you have had it with all the politicians and talking heads pushing the baloney at you, come on over and have a beer with me as we listen to an appellate argument!

Sincerely,

Steven Perlmutter
90 Todd Pond Rd.

Perlmutter is a semi-retired trial and appellate lawyer who hosted a 12-part Council on Aging series of talks in 2015 about Michael Sandel’s “Justice” course at Harvard.


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: government, letters to the editor Leave a Comment

News acorns

February 8, 2017

Library seeks Board of Trustees member

The Trustees of the Lincoln Public Library announce that there is an opening for a self-perpetuating trustee on the board, and they encourage interested Lincoln residents to apply. A summary of the trustee responsibilities is available at the library circulation desk. Under guidelines adopted for the appointment of self-perpetuating trustees, preference will be given to candidates expected and willing to serve for six years. Interested candidates are asked to apply in writing to Peter Sugar or Kathleen Nichols, c/o Lincoln Public Library, Bedford Road, Lincoln, MA 01773 by Monday, Feb. 20. For further information, call Library Director Barbara Myles at 781-259-8465.

A walk through the history of shoes

Are you curious about the footwear of years gone by? If so, explore the evolution of shoes since the reign of Queen Victoria through the 20th century on a “walk” through the history of shoes by Karen Antonowicz of the Rhode Island School of Design on Thursday, Feb. 23 at 7 p.m. in the Lincoln Public Library Tarbell Room. We will discover the developments that occurred in footwear for women and men of the 19th and 20th centuries, emphasizing the influences that precipitated these changes. The talk is in advance of a trip to see the Peabody-Essex Museum’s “Shoes: Pleasure and Pain” exhibit on Saturday, Feb. 25, but the talk is open to all including those who did not sign up for the trip. Sponsored by The Friends of the Lincoln Public Library .

Seventh-grader chosen for music festival

Emily Feng

Lincoln School seventh-grader Emily Feng was selected through a vigorous audition process to participate in the Massachusetts Music Educators Eastern District Junior Festival to be held at Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School on March 3 and 4. The program is offered by the Massachusetts Music Educators Association – Eastern District as an enrichment opportunity that brings together the top musicians in our schools. Over 900 music students in grades 7–9 from 30 school districts auditioned on January 28; less than half were accepted. Emily will play in the first violin section in the orchestra.

 

Category: government, history, kids, news Leave a Comment

Town Meeting warrant article list published

February 5, 2017

The list of articles for the 2017 Annual Town Meeting on March 25 includes 42 articles that will ask residents for a “year” or “nay” on numerous issues that have been in the news in Lincoln over the past year or more.

Below are links to previous Lincoln Squirrel stories about some of the items. The Squirrel will also publish new stories about Town Meeting articles in the coming days and weeks as more details become available.

Wang property acquisition (article 11)

  • ConsComm OKs approves ‘land swap’ for solar installation
  • Sale closes on Wang property; town will be asked for $850,000+
  • Land purchase aims to help town and Birches School

Accessory apartments (articles 12-14)

  • Residents hear about affordable accessory apartment proposal

School project (articles 33 and 34)

  • Officials offer school recommendations, borrowing estimates
  • School Committee recommends Lincoln-only school project; multiboard meeting Monday night
  • Town to grapple once again with future of school project
  • State says no to Lincoln school funding for the third time

Community center feasibility study (article 35)

  • No major obstacles to putting community center on campus, consultant says
  • Community center on Hartwell campus would cost $13 million, panel says
  • Residents delve into community center, school project at State of the Town

Landfill solar initiative (article 36)

  • ConsComm OKs approves ‘land swap’ for solar installation
  • Benefits and hurdles for solar array at landfill discussed
  • Solar array considered for landfill site

Agricultural bylaw amendment (article 38)

  • Small-scale agriculture expansion discussed at SOTT

Category: agriculture and flora, conservation, government, land use, news, schools, seniors, sports & recreation Leave a Comment

Letter to the editor: Stanley supports Safe Communities Act

February 5, 2017

letter

To the editor:

People who perpetuate crime and acts of terror have many different origins and appearances. These acts are not committed primarily by people of the Muslim faith, nor those from the immigrant community.

America is an ethnically and racially diverse country; residents come from all over the world to join our proud community. In past years, our country embraced newcomers from places like Italy, Ireland, England, Scotland and Canada. In recent years, we have welcomed Latin Americans, South Asians and Haitians, among others. And we are a better country for their presence and contributions.

The recent actions taken by the Trump administration set a damaging tone and misrepresent what our country stands for: religious freedom and embracing people from far and wide. They also send the wrong message to those who wish to come here, and communities at home that now fear for the safety of themselves and their loved ones.

We all want to be safe from people who instill fear, hatred and violence. But the President’s recent Executive Order affecting refugees and immigration make America less safe. Policies banning Muslims and directing law enforcement to ramp up the deportation of families will likely have the effect of motivating those who wish to harm us.

With regards to terror, our nation’s resources and energy should be focused on routing out terrorists at home and abroad and not blanket discrimination based on color, origin or religion. I support legislation (the Safe Communities Act) which prohibits state support for a Muslim registry and the use of state and local resources for mass deportations or deportation raids but allows continued local and state police collaboration with federal immigration agents to apprehend dangerous criminals.

We cannot allow fear to divide us.

Sincerely,

State Rep. Thomas Stanley (9th Middlesex District)


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: government Leave a Comment

Correction

February 2, 2017

A February 1 article headlined “Officials offer school recommendations, borrowing estimates” incorrectly referenced another upcoming multiboard meeting in February. The next such meeting will be on March 8 at 7 p.m. in the Brooks gym. The original story has been corrected.

 

Category: government, schools Leave a Comment

Officials offer school recommendations, borrowing estimates

February 1, 2017

Saying “we believe it’s time to act on our own,” School Committee Chair Jennifer Glass outlined next steps for a town-funded school project at a multi-board meeting earlier this week.

Glass told the Board of Selectmen last month that her group recommended not applying again for state funding, but start the planning process for a school project that the town would pay for by itself. At the multiboard meeting, she explained the committee’s reasoning, while Finance Committee Vice Chair Jim Hutchinson outlined some funding and property tax scenarios.

There will be two warrant articles at Town Meeting next month—one on whether to spend a previously approved $750,000 on a town-funded school feasibility study, and another on whether to reapply for state funding—but “we see that as a fork in the road, an either/or choice,” Glass said. The increased competition for state grants and the immediate needs of the Lincoln School from both facilities and educational standpoints mean that waiting any longer is not the best option, she said.

Previous meetings and votes indicate that there is community consensus on four points:

  • The education value of a school project is a top priority
  • Residents understand that the town will have to spend a minimum of $30 million for a “responsible project”
  • There is “strong support” for a project that would cost $45 million to $60 million even without state funding
  • There is interest in planning collaboration for a school project and community center

The cost estimates were provided by Dore and Whitter in their report in late 2014. At that time, they outlined three groups of renovation and construction options and price ranges:

  • Option 1 – facilities needs only: $12–$29 million
  • Option 2 – facilities needs plus “a la carte” educational enhancements: $29–$47 million
  • Option 3 – facilities needs plus comprehensive educational enhancements: $54–$66 million

The new feasibility study process would again outline the school’s needs, the town’s educational and community vision and building options, as well as an eventual a decision on one option to put forward for a town vote. The Dore & Whittier report did some of this but did not include faculty input, nor did it address the overall site plan in terms of roadways, athletic fields, etc., Glass noted.

Borrowing costs

Although construction costs have climbed since 2014, interest rates have remained steady, Hutchinson said. The Finance Committee has consulted with bond advisors and concluded that the town can borrow up to $80 million without losing its AAA bond rating, which affects future borrowing costs. That level of borrowing would drive the town’s debt-to-operating ration from the 3-4% range up to 12-13%, he said.

To soften the tax impact, the Finance Committee recommends additional steps such as repaying the bonds over 30 years rather than 20. Also advisable is a “level debt” whereby annual payments would remain the same, though they would effectively decline as a percentage of revenue over time due to inflation, Hutchinson said. Although the town has a debt stabilization fund, spending all of it is not a good idea, because “there are always unanticipated things that happen to towns and we need to have some kind of buffer,” he added.

Another way to spread out the repayments would be to borrow for a community center and a school project separately “and put it in two lumps rather than one big lump,” Hutchinson said.

Voters at Town Meeting will be asked for a $150,000 appropriation for a feasibility study by a community center building committee that would work alongside the new school building committee. The Board of Selectmen would “mandate cooperation between the two,” Selectman Peter Braun said.

One advantage of not involving the MSBA is it frees the town from having to clearly separate design and planning for a school project and a community center, Glass noted.

Property tax impact

What does this mean for Lincoln taxpayers? Hutchinson did not have final estimates this week (the committee will present them at another multi-board meeting on March 8), but an earlier analysis that assumed a 4.6% interest rate and a more aggressive repayment schedule showed that tax bills would rise by $367 per year on a median-value home for every $10 million that the town borrowed. The median home value is $883,000, so someone with a home of that value would pay an additional $1,101 per year if the town borrowed $30 million, for example.

However, Hutchinson noted that interest rates are actually lower than the projected figure (about 3.4% right now), so the repayment cost would be lower than the example—more like $300 per $10 million borrowed, he said.

Even if the town decided on a “repair-only” direction, it would not be eligible for Massachusetts School Building Authority funding, Glass said. The MSBA has two grant programs: the core program and the “accelerated repair” program, which funds individual repair projects such as roofs and boilers. However, schools who get the second type of funding have no other major facilities or educational flaws aside from the isolated issue, and Lincoln does not meet that standard.

Other area towns have done town-funded school projects in recent years, including a new elementary school in Brookline and a replacement for the Zervas School in Newton. Lexington has done several projects, some with MSBA funding and some without. Wellesley has been turned down by the MSBA several times for a project that would consolidate three elementary schools into two and is also contemplating going it alone, Glass said.

One focus of debate is sure to be which major project to do first. The Council on Aging and the Parks and Recreation Department are advocating for a community center and have suggested that if it were built first, some of its space would be used by the school while staged school construction work was taking place.

But resident Ken Hurd disagreed. “My preference would be if the focus is really the school because this is what we need the most. We’re going to attract more people if we have the school situation resolved. A community center is nice is nice and we need it, but it’s not going to bring people to Lincoln,” he said.

“Town leadership should take a position on what the priorities should be,” said Steve Perlmutter, a member of the 2014 School Building Advisory Committee.

 

Category: community center*, government, school project*, schools Leave a Comment

Public hearings coming up

February 1, 2017

The Zoning Board of the Appeals of the Town of Lincoln will hold a public hearing on Thursday, Feb. 2 at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Office Building to hear and to act on the following petitions under the Zoning Bylaws:

  • Nunzio Domilici, 22 Deer Run Road, for transfer and renewal of an accessory apartment special permit.
  • Holly Hedlund, 21 Morningside Lane, for extension of time on original approved special permit.

The Lincoln Historical Commission will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 7 in the Town Office Building to consider the application of Massachusetts Audubon Society to demolish the existing structure known as the “Education Building” at 208 South Great Rd.

A complete list of public notices for the town of Lincoln can be found here.

Category: government, land use, news Leave a Comment

Letter to the editor: support updated open-space plan

February 1, 2017

letter

(Editor’s note: See this Lincoln Squirrel article from July 2016 for more background.)

To the editor:

Lincoln’s update to the Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP) is nearly complete (the previous update was published in 2008). The OSRP Committee has worked diligently over the last eight months to get to this point. There were two community forums and an OSRP survey to obtain feedback from residents. Now it is ready to bring before the Selectmen for final approval. Please join us at their February 6 meeting and show your support for this guidance document.

An OSRP is a tool that helps a municipality maintain and improve the benefits of open space and recreation facilities that contribute to the character of the community and protect its “green infrastructure.” Planning for this “green infrastructure” of water, land, farms, wildlife habitat, parks, recreation areas, trails and greenways is as important to the economic future of a community as planning for schools, roads and public safety. With a current plan approved by the Massachusetts Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs, Lincoln will be eligible for state grants to help fund open space and recreation projects and programs. OSRP highlights include:

  • an inventory of Lincoln’s open spaces and recreation facilities
  • a 7-year action plan
  • descriptions of key scenic resources
  • background on our community’s natural resources and conservation history
  • an evaluation of how our OSRP facilities serve people with disabilities
  • accompanying maps

The Board of Selectmen will discuss the OSRP on Monday, Feb. 6 at 7:30 p.m. in the Donaldson Room of the Town Office Building.

Sincerely,

Angela Kearney
Conservation Planner, Lincoln Conservation Dept.


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: conservation, government, news Leave a Comment

News acorns

January 31, 2017

Candidates still needed for two town posts

There’s still time to run for office in the upcoming Town Election of March 27. Currently there are no candidates for the Housing Commission (a three-year seat) or Bemis Board of Trustees (a one-year seat). The deadline to take out nomination papers from the Town Clerk’s office is Friday, Feb. 3. Papers must be returned for certification by 5 p.m. on Tuesday, Feb. 7.  Candidates must collect 28 registered voter signatures to appear on the ballot.

Selectman candidate’s forum on Feb. 12

The Northside News will host a session for candidates for the Board of Selectmen—Jonathan Dwyer, Jennifer Glass and Allen Vander Meulen—in a discussion of issues facing the town on Sunday, Feb. 12 from 12:30-2:30 p.m. at the Lincoln North Office Building (55 Old Bedford Road). Residents will have a chance to hear from each candidate, pose questions and discuss issues. (Editor’s note: the Lincoln Squirrel will publish interviews with Glass and Vander Meulen before this event.)

Donated toiletries sought

Women and children who are in shelters remaking their lives after experiencing domestic violence need toiletries like shampoo, soap, toothpaste, hand and body lotions, and more. If you have unopened toiletries from hotels or stores that you can’t use, please bring them to Bemis Hall by Friday, Feb. 6. A volunteer will take them to local domestic violence organizations for Valentine’s Day distribution.

“Lincoln marchers” start email list

Some of the “Lincoln marchers” who went to the Boston Women’s March for America (or those who went to the Washington March) on January 21 are organizing an email network to facilitate follow-up action on behalf of the march objectives of peace and justice. The group is starting with the “10 actions 100 days” agenda that can be found on the website of the Women’s March for America (www.womensmarch.com/100). If you would like to add your name to the Lincoln email list, whether or not you actually marched on that date, please contact Barbara Slayter at bslayter@comcast.net.

LOMA features Greg Klyma

Greg Klyma will be the featured performer at the next LOMA (Lincoln Open-Mike Acoustic) night on Monday, Feb. 13 from 7-10 p.m. at the Lincoln Public Library. Admission is free and refreshments are provided. Klyma will perform a half-hour set starting around 8:30. His articulate and amusing stories and populist ideals make him a rare young artist in the mold of Woody and Ramblin’ Jack. A nationally touring performer, he has seven albums to his credit; his latest, Another Man’s Treasure, features the song Livin’ the Life.

LOMA is a monthly event. Performers can sign up at the event or email Rich Eilbert at loma3re@gmail.com for a slot. There is a sound system with mikes and instrumental pickups suitable for individuals or small groups.

Category: arts, charity/volunteer, elections, government Leave a Comment

School Committee recommends Lincoln-only school project; multiboard meeting Monday night

January 29, 2017

The School Committee has voted unanimously to recommend that the town move forward with a Lincoln-funded school project and not reapply for state funding.

There will be a multi-board meeting on Monday, Jan. 30 at 7 p.m. in the Brooks gym to discuss the school project. In an earlier announcement about that meeting, the committee said it would sponsor two Town Meeting warrant articles: one asking whether the town should go ahead and spend $750,000 that was appropriated in 2015 on a feasibility study for a town-funded school project, and whether to apply again to the Massachusetts State Building Authority (MSBA) for a grant.

“We view these two articles as either/or,” School Committee Chair Jennifer Glass told the Board of Selectman at its January 25 meeting. “We’re saying we’ve reached a point where there are two directions and we’re asking the town which way we should go, and our recommendation is to go the first way.”

The physical condition of the Lincoln School and the need for educational improvements means that continuing to hope for uncertain MSBA funding is no longer a good option, according to Glass. “Each year we delay in this process, we risk failure of some major system such as a roof or boiler,” she said, adding that construction costs have “gone up pretty dramatically” over the past several years.

As the School Committee has learned more about the workings of the MSBA, it’s also become less confident that it will be invited into the funding pipeline again anytime soon, Glass said. Meetings with MSBA officials after the 2016 and 2016 rejections have shown “just how competitive a process it is… and have given us a pretty clear-eyed vision of where we are in terms of those [MSBA funding] criteria,” she said.

There is also some level of community agreement that a town-funded school is the best option at this point, Glass added. “We’ve built a lot of excitement and consensus that it’s time to address this. It feels like there’s this moment of opportunity,” she said. Furthermore, those hoping for construction of a community center “will have clearer path when we figure out what’s going on with the school.”

Applying to the MSBA while also pursuing a Lincoln-funded project “would send a mixed message to the state” and would also risk wasting its $750,000 outlay, because if Lincoln eventually got invited into the MSBA funding pipeline, it would have to do a completely new feasibility study, Glass said. Similarly, the School Committee is unwilling to waste the effort of another School Building Committee in the event state money ever appeared.

“It is incredibly intense to be on a School Building Committee,” she said. “I’m not comfortable asking our fellow townspeople to make that kind of investment and then say ‘Whoops, sorry, we’re putting that aside and were going to start again and hire a new architect and a new OPM [owner’s project manager]… it feels like we just need to decide.”

Glass concluded by saying her panel will seek support for its position from as many town government bodies as possible, including the Board of Selectmen.

“I commend the School Committee for putting a stake in the ground on this,” Selectman Peter Braun said.

Faced with the need to borrow a substantial sum of money, selectmen said they hoped the Finance Committee would be receptive to increasing the town’s debt stabilization fund, which currently stands at about $3.7 million. “As a town, we need to start examining what strategies we can take for a large-scale [funding] process,” Selectman James Craig said.

Category: government, school project*, schools Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 46
  • Page 47
  • Page 48
  • Page 49
  • Page 50
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 94
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Correction and clarification October 26, 2026
  • Geothermal option for library fails to win approval at Town Meeting October 25, 2026
  • Addendum October 25, 2026
  • News acorns October 22, 2026
  • Commons residents on the run October 22, 2026

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Advanced search

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2026 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.