In the October 24 obituary for Ted Knowlton, the name of his daughter, Polly Knowlton Cockett, was misspelled. The error has been corrected in the original article.
Ted Knowlton, 1926–2018
Ted Knowlton
(Editor’s note: this obituary was submitted directly to the Lincoln Squirrel by Polly Knowlton Cockett, Ted Knowlton’s daughter.)
Edward “Ted” Almy Knowlton, 92, of Lincoln died peacefully on October 2 with his special dog, Boomer, at his feet and his wife of 33 years, Anne “Annie” (Preston) Raker Knowlton, by his side.
Ted was born to Edward “Ned” Allen Knowlton and Leila May (Osborne) Knowlton of Holyoke, Mass., on August 26, 1926 in Westerly, R.I. The family summered in Groton Long Point, Conn., where they owned the Duck, a 24-foot open sailboat which Ted skippered for many years. He attended public schools in Holyoke through grade 10, completed school at Phillips Exeter Academy, and enlisted in the Army Air Corps in 1944.
At Yale University, Ted lived in Branford College and graduated in 1950 with a B.S. in industrial administration, a combination of engineering and economics. In 1951, Ted married the late Marianne (Heimburg) Knowlton, and they and their four children lived in Winchester, Mass. for many years.
Following a variety of engineering jobs, including developing an innovative line of products, six with patents, Ted gained electronics experience, capping his career at NEC Electronics by developing a floating-point math package for computer controllers. Combining his computer and mechanical skills, as well as his musical pursuits, Ted built and developed a computer-controlled precision piano tuner—with the prototype gracing his grand piano in the living room for many a year.
Throughout his life, Ted was deeply engaged in music as a jazz pianist, which built on early classical training followed by self-taught jazz improvisation during high school and university, and regular gigs for the remainder of his life, including teaching at Berklee College of Music in Boston. He cherished the myriad musical colleagues he had the privilege to play with over the years, and his legendary jazz parties will be remembered.
With his wife Annie, Ted became involved in the New England Old English Sheepdog Rescue as a charter member, and created NEOESR’s website and database. Ted philosophically evolved to embrace the abiding concepts of truth, beauty, goodness, and love.
Ted is survived by Annie; his children Laurence (Suzanne), Polly (Robin), and Liza (Clifford); stepchildren Robert (Annette), Deborah, Michael (Leslie), and David (Lisa); many grandchildren, step-grandchildren, great-grandchildren, nieces, and nephews. He was predeceased by son Edward and siblings Sylvia, Archa, Bessie, and Harriette.
A celebration of Ted’s life will be held at a later date. In lieu of flowers, please consider a memorial donation to a charity of your choice.
Court rules against McLean Hospital in Bypass Road case
In a much-awaited decision released this week, the state land court has denied McLean Hospital’s appeal of a town decision against a plan to put a 12-bed residential facility for boys in a residential property on Bypass Road.
The saga began in 2016 when the hospital purchased the 6,700-square-foot home at 22 Bypass Rd. with plans to house boys age 15-21 for transitional care as part of its 3East program. McLean argued that this constituted an educational use of the property, which made it exempt from town zoning restrictions. The so-called Dover Amendment in state law requires towns to permit educational and religious facilities in areas not zoned for such uses.
Citing previous court cases, town attorney Joel Bard said in a May 2016 letter that he believed McLean’s use was educational and thus permitted, so then-Building Inspector Dan Walsh gave the initial go-ahead in a letter of his own in July 2016. But a group of neighborhood residents successfully appealed to the Zoning Board if Appeals, which overruled Walsh. McLean then filed suit to appeal the ZBA decision in late 2017, and the case went to trial in October 2017.
McLean argued that its program included a curriculum to teach clients coping skills drawn from dialectical behavior therapy. “But to conclude that the structure of the program essentially transforms a therapeutic program into an educational one for the purposes of Dover Amendment protection would, in fact, elevate form over substance,” the court ruled. “The primary and predominant purpose of the 3East Boys Program is the treatment of a serious mental condition. Accordingly, this court finds and rules that McLean’s 3East Boys Program is not an educational use entitled to the benefits and protections of the Dover Amendment.”
“We are gratified by the decision of the court which affirms the thoughtful approach of our ZBA, and its careful analysis of the facts, and upholds the integrity of the town’s bylaw,” the Board of Selectmen said in a statement. “The nature of the project raised passions on both sides, among those who were concerned, and among those who were generally supportive of McLean’s proposal… In the end, we believe the process yielded the right result for our community.
“We always said this was a medical program that should not be allowed in a residential area under the educational exemption,” said Steve Kanner, the primary organizer of the residents who fought McLean’s proposal. “We’re certainly highly pleased to see the court came down and said exactly that, including referring to a possible overreach of the argument.”
Kanner called the ruling “a ringing affirmation of the correctness of the ZBA’s decision,” adding, “I would hope there would be some institutional reflection on the original decision [that McLean’s proposal was allowable] and how and why it came about.”
Selectmen sounded a similar note in their statement. “Going forward, we will reflect on the process and evaluate what worked well and where there are opportunities for improvement, to help inform our response should a similar proposal come forward in the future.”
Special counsel Jay Talerman, who represented the town during the lawsuit, declined to comment on the decision but said town officials and attorneys planned to meet Friday to discuss it.
“I’m happy for the decision. It upheld the analysis and decision that the ZBA made in its very careful review,” said Joel Freedman, who as ZBA co-chair was one of the defendants in the case. “It probably breaks some new law in the area of the Dover amendment and the limits of it, which is interesting.”
Dr. Philip Levendusky, senior vice president for business development and communications and director of McLean’s Psychology Department, and Diane Tillotson, McLean’s attorney in the case, did not return calls or emails Wednesday requesting comment.
News acorns
L-S officials to hold coffee, listening sessions
The Lincoln-Sudbury School Committee will be hosting three office hours/listening sessions this week, including one in Lincoln:
- Thursday, Oct. 25 from 7–8 p.m. — Goodnow Library (second-floor conference room), Sudbury
- Friday, Oct. 26 from 9–10 a.m. — deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum Cafe, Lincoln
- Friday, Oct. 26 from 11 a.m.–noon — Karma Coffee, Sudbury
Click here for the full 2018-19 list of dates and times for listening sessions.
L-S Superintendent/Principal Bella Wong will also host a Parent Coffee for parents of current L-S students on Monday, Oct. 29 from 8–9 a.m. in Conference Room A (sign in and get directions at the main office).
St. Anne’s to hold service of remembrance
St. Anne’s in-the-Fields Episcopal Church will mark All Saints Sunday on November 4, remembering those who have died with a special service of remembrance at 5 p.m. The choir will sing Maurice Duruflé’s Requiem, accompanied by guest organist David Carrier. All are welcome.
L-S students commended for PSAT scores
Lincoln residents Irene Terpstra and Colton Volpe are among the Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School commended students recognized for their exceptional academic promise by the 2019 National Merit Scholarship Program. Nationwide, commended students placed among the top 50,000 scorers of more than 1.6 million students who entered the 2019 competition by taking the 2017 Preliminary SAT/National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (PSAT/NMSQT).
Donate used Lincoln Youth Soccer gear
The First Parish in Lincoln’s Youth Group is collecting used Lincoln Youth Soccer uniforms and gear to send to Ethiopia with Jen Gill and Sylvia Perry when they go to serve as part of a medical team. Collection bins are located on the steps of the Parish House at 14 Bedford Rd. and at the Parks and Recreation office in Hartwell pod A on Ballfield Road. Any used LYS uniforms and gear collected after Sylvia and Jen’s November travel will be sent to an equally deserving soccer program.
Letter to the editor: vote no on Question 1
(Editor’s note: Care Dimensions runs the hospice house on Winter Street in Lincoln.)
To the editor:
I am CEO of Care Dimensions, the largest hospice organization in Massachusetts, and a nurse who worked for nearly 30 years in the emergency room and critical care units of a hospital, and I’m voting no on Ballot Question 1.
Like anyone, and most especially as a nursing leader, I have a responsibility and a desire to make sure that the work of nurses is protected and revered. While on the surface this proposed legislation may seem like it would bring benefit for nurses and patients, fixed staffing approaches to meeting the changing needs of patients would have severe consequences without improving care.
Staffing decisions are made by nurses and managers together considering many factors such as the acuity of patients, admission/discharge/transfer activity, availability of support staff, and the capabilities and experience of the nurses. All of these elements would wash away in a pure ratio-only model.
Consider what a nurse would do when a patient condition deteriorates on a floor or a trauma patient arrives in the emergency room where nurses are at their number limit. Fixed ratios decrease access to care and prohibit nurses from using professional judgment in managing care of patients. If the ballot initiative were passed, the fixed ratios would need to be followed “at all times” and steep fines will be applied if violated, even if there were serious outcomes as a result of the lack of access to care.
Question 1 is an important issue to those of us who deliver post-acute care in non-hospital settings. If hospitals are forced to hire nearly 6,000 nurses in just 37 business days to comply with the law, they will have no choice but to pull from organizations like ours. There will be no nurses left out in the community. There is already a dire nursing shortage. Hospitals could hire every nurse in the state and still not have enough. Being left without nurses would be catastrophic for our patients.
We currently employ more than 500 people, the vast majority of whom are nurses. Most of them travel and see patients in their homes. Nationwide, healthcare has moved toward keeping patients out of hospitals, which is what home care, hospice, and community services do. If we can’t recruit nurses, we can’t keep patients safe in their own homes. Question 1 would unwind our progress in transitioning to comfortable, home-oriented community care.
I have another worry about the impact on our community hospitals. One of our nearby community hospitals estimates the impact at over $7.9 million per year and would require the hiring of 48 full-time RNs. This will result in having to make serious decisions regarding programs and the number of patient care units that could remain open. From a personal standpoint, I don’t want my own community hospital to close; that would be damaging and dangerous to communities and patients.
Additionally, many hospice patients are referred from community hospitals, meaning this law would directly impact our work. Patients would hear about hospice and palliative care options even later than they do now, causing hardship for families.
Finally, there is only one other state in the nation that has mandated hospital nurse staffing ratios: California. There is evidence that quality and satisfaction scores have gone down since ratios were introduced there. After 14 years of the ratio rule in California, that state ranks behind Massachusetts in five of six mortality prevention measures and in all of the 11 patient satisfaction categories.
In reality, Massachusetts consistently ranks among the best states in the U.S. on hospital quality and outcome measures. Our state has earned national acclaim from several top-tier ranking systems including the Commonwealth Fund’s State Health System Performance that placed Massachusetts second overall in the nation, versus California’s 14th-place finish.
This law would harm everyone, everywhere, and incapacitate Massachusetts healthcare. I plan to vote no—not because I don’t care about nurses, but because I care very deeply for all of them, wherever they work. I encourage you to examine this issue more closely, and welcome you to join me in voting no on 1 on Nov. 6.
Sincerely,
Patricia Ahern, RN, MBA, FACHE
President and CEO, Care Dimensions
Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.
deCordova aims to integrate with Trustees of Reservations
Facing financial straits, the deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum hopes to save itself by becoming part of the Trustees of Reservations.
Julian deCordova willed his estate and together with income to the town under the condition that it remain a public park and museum. However, the income from the estate, membership/admission fees and other sources has not been enough to sustain the organization, which has relied for years on large gifts from a handful of donors to keep operating. This year’s operating budget shortfall is about $1 million even after several major gifts, John Ravenal, the deCordova’s executive director, said at the October 20 State of the Town Meeting.
When Ravenal took the helm in 2015, he found an institution that was “thriving programmatically” but was “surprised to discover the financial difficulty,” he said. The deCordova has been operating under a “fragile financial model,” with an endowment that covers only 7 percent of operating expenses compared to about 22 percent for most other museums, “and this unstable model has finally collapsed,” he added.
Other possibilities for keeping the deCordova afloat were deemed unrealistic, Ravenal said. Downsizing would cause donors to drop away, so “our revenue would always fall faster than the savings would accrue,” he said. Partnerships with sister institutions wouldn’t work because “their difficulties merely duplicated our own.”
Pending approvals from residents at Town Meeting in March, the deCordova would become a subsidiary of the Trustees, while the town of Lincoln would retain ownership of the land and general oversight as the charitable trustee, according to an FAQ document handed out at the State of the Town.
The mission of the Trustees is to “preserve, for public use and enjoyment, properties of exceptional scenic, historic, cultural, and ecological value in Massachusetts”—properties that include Castle Hill on the Crane Estate in Ipswich, the Fruitlands Museum in Harvard, and World’s End in Hingham.
The integration would allow the deCordova to benefit from the fundraising, marketing, management, and legal resources of the larger Trustees of Reservations, Ravenal said. It will not alter its mission or approach, and no jobs will be lost, as the deCordova’s employees would become employees of the Trustees.
The Trustees aim to raise $15 million (of which $10 million has already been pledged) to fund the integration by adding to the deCordova’s endowment, retiring debt, investing in deferred maintenance, and closing this year’s budget gap.
The town currently does not provide any funding to the deCordova, and that too will not change, Ravenal said. The “only viable solution has actually evolved into a promising opportunity” for the deCordova and the town, since the plan would “reduce risk of an increased financial burden to residents,” he said.
The Board of Selectmen “has to look at the what-if scenario if the deCordova had to shut its doors,” Selectman James Craig said. At a minimum, the town would have to pay for upkeep of the sculpture park grounds and basic maintenance of the building.
Once the agreement is in place, “not a whole lot” will change, said Trustees President and CEO Barbara Erickson. “Our entire goal is to preserve what you know and love and what we deliver today… for us, it’s a win-win.”
School project budget, financing aired at SOTT
A summary of “value engineering” items trimmed to bring the school project back to the approved $93.9 budget (click to enlarge).
Town officials provided updates on the two pending school campus construction projects at the State of the Town meeting on October 20, outlining a series of cuts made to bring the school project under budget and a timeline for the community center.
The detailed construction cost estimate presented to the School Building Committee in September was about $9 million more than the $93.9 million budget approved by voters in June, so the SBC had just weeks to decide what to trim as it prepares for bonding votes at a Special Town Meeting on December 1 and at the ballot box on December 3. The areas where cost estimates rose the most compared to the figures presented in June were site work, which went up by $5.22 million, and temporary modular classrooms, which rose by $2.94 million.
After three weeks of painstakingly combing through a list of more than 100 construction items, the SBC got the project under budget. Members actually trimmed more than $9 million because they also added two items: $870,000 for an upgraded HVAC system and $150,000 for a slightly redesigned center of the building.
The biggest savings will come from site work. The SBC lopped $3.9 million from that category by cutting back on granite curbs and repaving and foregoing new plantings, sod for the ballfield, and new playground equipment. Officials expect to save $1.68 million by negotiating less expensive temporary classrooms.
To save another $2.5 million, the town will hire a third-party firm to install the solar equipment rather than paying for and owning it as part of the project. Lincoln would then enter into a power purchase agreement where it would buy electricity, thus shifting much of the financial burden from the construction budget to the operating budget. On the bright side, this also means that enough solar equipment can be installed to make the school “net zero” in terms of energy use.
The final borrowing amount that the town will vote on in December hasn’t been determined yet, because other sources of funding have to be nailed down. Those sources include the following (with current balances in parentheses):
- The debt stabilization fund ($5.5 million). This fund has been accumulating for years in anticipation of the school project, though the Finance Committee may recommend retaining some of it for the Community Center project
- Free cash (about $1 million). This is a relatively large amount because the town recently received a large building permit fee.
- Community Preservation Act funds (about $600,000 not otherwise designated). These funds can be used to outdoor recreational things like athletic fields and playgrounds.
- The cable revolving fund ($226,000) from the annual license fee to support local cable access. This fund balance increases by about $80,000 a year and Town Administrator Tim Higgins will recommend that the Board of Selectmen “commit the lion’s share of that money” to applicable parts of the school project such as audiovisual work in the Brooks auditorium, he said at an October 18 multiboard meeting.
The town considered using Chapter 90 state funds for roadway improvements to Ballfield Road as part of the school project but decided it would be unwise to divert that money from regular road maintenance around town.
- Click here for the State of the Town presentations by the School Building Committee and Finance Committee
Estimated property tax increases as a result of the school borrowing (click to enlarge).
The precise tax impacts of the borrowing won’t be known until the final borrowing amount and bond interest rate are known. “It’ll be less than the 20 percent people had in their minds due to the tranching, but it won’t be a lot less,” Finance Committee chair Jim Hutchinson said. “Tranching” means splitting up the borrowing into two or more loans over a period of time rather than borrowing the full amount in a single loan. Earlier FinCom figures indicated tax increases of 19 to 21 percent. The median tax bill in fiscal 2018 was $13,566.
The town also expects to borrow roughly another $20 million in 2024 to build the community center, which will bring the town’s debt service levels back up to 2019 levels. The most recent estimates for that project range from $15.3 million to $16.2 million depending on which design is selected.
”The school project is the biggest need for the town,” Selectman James Dwyer said at the State of the Town meeting, adding that work on the community center will not begin until the school is “substantially complete.” However, a community center building committee could be formed as soon as 2021, he said. There has been talk of forming a “Friends of…” group to solicit private donations for one or both campus projects, but this hasn’t yet moved beyond the discussion phase.
There will be two community workshops on the project on Thursday, November 1 at 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. in the Reed Gym. Officials have until November 17 to nail down a final bonding amount for the December 1 and December 3 votes. If approved, architects will require about 12 months to complete detailed drawings before the start of construction, which is expected to take up to three years in two phases.
Marijuana business ban passes at Special Town Meeting
Residents took the first step to ban marijuana-based businesses in Lincoln, at least for now, as residents approved a full ban at the October 18 Special Town Meeting.
Because Lincoln residents voted in favor of legalizing recreational marijuana in the 2016 state election, a two-thirds majority was required to enact the ban. The vote total according to a standing count was 73 percent in favor (140 votes) vs. 27 percent against (53 votes). However, a simple majority must also approve the ban at the town election in March 2019.
Before the vote on the ban, a large majority of residents approved extending the current moratorium on marijuana businesses until June 30, 2019.
In an earlier town survey sponsored by the Marijuana Study Committee that garnered 408 responses, 61 percent supported a full ban. Of the 39 percent who did not, 85 percent supported allowing marijuana cultivation in town and 70 percent were in favor of allowing retail sales of marijuana products. In the 2016 state vote, 53 percent of the 3,783 Lincoln residents who cast ballots residents voted to legalize recreational marijuana.
The Agricultural Commission voted in August to support commercial cultivation of marijuana in Lincoln. However, the Planning Board and the Board of Selectmen both unanimously recommended that residents approve the full ban. If the town were to allow commercial marijuana cultivation, it would be in keeping with the town’s agricultural character, the committee noted. However, the town would not gain any revenue, whereas if retail establishments were allowed, the town could reap up to 3 percent of gross sales.
- Click here for FAQs on commercial marijuana in Lincoln (handout from the State of the Town meeting)
Town officials did not have any estimates on either the amount of revenue that retail sales might bring in, nor the cost of additional police time that could be incurred. Police Chief Kevin Kennedy noted that because sales of marijuana is still illegal federally, products must be paid for with cash, potentially increasing the risk of robbery. Marijuana establishments can hire private guards, but they can’t be armed, he said.
Selectmen noted on Saturday that the full ban can be reserved in the future, but once legalized, marijuana businesses could not be banned later. Bedford, Weston, Concord, Sudbury, and Lexington have already approved full commercial bans. Wayland has done so at the ballot box but not at Town Meeting, while Waltham’s vote is still pending.
Owing to its low population density and location, “Lincoln is a most unattractive town in which to put a retail establishment” said Lincoln resident and cannabis operator/educator Jean Welsh, who was a panelist at a public forum on the issue in May. However, existing medical marijuana cultivation facilities in Massachusetts “are extremely secure; we have regulated them to the hilt,” she said. There are 30 dispensaries and about a dozen medical marijuana farms in the Commonwealth, “and we’re just not having issues,” she said.
Saying that alcohol is more dangerous than pot, Welsh wondered if the town ought to ban growing hops, which are used to make beer. For adults, marijuana “just isn’t that dangerous, folks, and I think in five to ten years you’re going to be buying it at Whole Foods anyway.”
The ban does not affect personal, noncommercial growing and possession of recreational marijuana, Selectman James Craig pointed out. Massachusetts law allows residents 21 and older to use the drug and have up to one ounce on their person (up to 10 ounces in their homes). Households with one adult over 21 can also grow up to six marijuana plants, or 12 plants if there are two adults in the household.
The Lincoln move has no effect on potential home delivery of marijuana products. The state Cannabis Control Commission does not currently allow home delivery of cannabis for recreational use, but it is considering allowing small Massachusetts-based marijuana retailers to make in-state home deliveries.
A few residents spoke against instituting the full ban. Given the restrictions on lot size for cultivation and on public visibility of the marijuana plants, “It doesn’t seem like it’s going to change the landscape very much,” said Sharon Antia. “Let’s just do it.”
Two medical professionals voiced warnings about marijuana’s effects on teenage brains. In treating teenagers and young adults having their first psychotic break, “marijuana is the single most important factor I have seen over the years,” said Rakesh Kharmacharya, an associate professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School and a clinician at McLean Hospital.
But such information is missing the point of the Town Meeting vote, said Ben Wells. “This isn’t a vote to ban adult use. That genie is out of the bottle. I’m concerned about teen use [of marijuana], but that’s not what’s on the ballot today. I’d hate to see us punish our farmers and entrepreneurs to send a message,” he said.
Peter Braun argued in favor of the full ban. “I’m informed by the wisdom of our surrounding towns,” he said, adding that “we need to see how it plays out” in towns that do allow marijuana businesses.
Letter to the editor: questions over reasoning behind proposed marijuana ban
To the editor:
A number of years ago, Lincoln spent more than a few Town Meetings discussing liquor in Lincoln. It certainly existed and was consumed. But it was not sold here, either for consumption elsewhere or in restaurants. Some thought to change that would forever change the character of the town for the worse. Some thought it would reflect reality and offer change for the better. But nowhere in the debates did we have to consider whether or not alcohol was bad for kids. It was accepted that alcohol (and tobacco) where not healthy for growing minds and bodies. The debate was about how the presence of alcohol sales and in restaurant consumption would affect our community.
It’s hard to believe how passionate those debates were, and how divided we were. Today, we have the sale of alcohol in Lincoln. Adults have purchased and enjoyed cocktails, wine and beer in a Lincoln restaurant. We host a vintner and have vineyards dotting hillsides. And alcohol is regulated to ensure it does not fall into the hands of underage children at the point of sale.
So it is puzzling to me that we cannot trust ourselves to be equally successful in regulating aspects of marijuana production and sale, without a change in bylaws that create a broadly worded ban that may have unintended consequences. And as to the growing, I am curious to know why our existing bylaws will not be effective to regulate the size and operation of any potential marijuana farm, if it is to exist in a large greenhouse, as they do. We have setback requirements and lighting bylaws. And do we not have some potential for regulation of water usage?
Also, while greenhouses, large and small, have been part of Lincoln’s agricultural legacy, few exist today, in part because of these very bylaws. In fact, there are few parcels large enough to accommodate a commercial operation. And those parcels are primarily owned by the town and managed by our Conservation Commission. What other parcels are there that could host such a grow operations and be outside our direct control? Are we reacting to a problem that does not currently and may never exist?
Finally, is there a danger to create a bylaw expressly designed to ban a particular form of agriculture? As a previous submission to LincolnTalk argued, cattle pose an environmental and dietary health threat. Might they be next? Would we be setting a precedent to begin to selectively ban specific agricultural activities?
We must also remember that a majority of us voted at the ballot box to make both medicinal and recreational marijuana legal in the Commonwealth, though a more recent town survey expressed a contradictory opinion. Should we respect the will of the voter in the ballot box, creating a legally binding law, or opinions expressed in a nonbinding survey? Do the current proposed bylaws under consideration work to thwart the will of the voters, as expressed at the ballot? This is also the debate at the state level, where elected and appointed officials have been at odds with the expressed will of the people.
It is ironic that we are having this debate as our neighbors to the north, known for their common sense, civility and safe communities, have legalized marijuana throughout the country. What do they know that we don’t? Are we rewinding and replaying the debate over alcohol? Is it necessary? Have we not learned anything in the last 10+ years? Is this a sensible thing to do?
Sincerely,
Sara Mattes
71 Conant Rd., Lincoln
Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.
News acorns
Halloween-themed events for kids
- Dance in costume to children’s songs and Halloween favorites at two Halloween dance parties on Saturday, Oct. 20 and Wednesday, Oct. 31, both at 11 a.m. in the Lincoln Public Library. For ages 6 and under. No registration required.
- Kids and car owners are invited to the Parks and Recreation Department’s annual Trunk or Treat in the Brooks parking lot on Wednesday, Oct. 24 from 5–6 p.m. Decorate your trunk or back of your car and pass out candy or toys, or have fun games for the kids. Car owners may register at www.lincolnrec.com or in the PRD office. Kids don’t need to register—just show up in costume
- Come enjoy a fun live-action game event, “Escape from the Creepy Crypt,” led by gamemaster Matt Donle from Wicked Fun Games in two sessions on Monday, Oct. 29 at 5 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. For ages 10+. Registration required; email dleopold@minlib.netor call 781-259-8465 x4.
Wildflower Society expert to speak
New England Wildflower Society propagator and stock bed grower Dan Jaffe will give a talk titled “Weeds!” on Tuesday, Oct. 30 at 7 p.m. in Bemis Hall. Sponsored by the Lincoln Garden Club.
“Cat’s Play” on the screen
The Lincoln Public Library Film Society will screen Cat’s Play (1974) on Thursday, Nov. 1 at 6:30 p.m. It’s a heartbreaking story of two unmarried sisters who cast wistful glances back at their lives while still believing in hope and love. In Hungarian with English subtitles. Nominated for Best Foreign Language Film.
Blues musicians play Bemis
Sax Gordon Beadle and Toni Lynn Washington
All ages are invited to a free concert by renowned blues vocalist Toni Lynn Washington and acclaimed saxophonist Sax Gordon Beadle on Sunday, Nov. 4 at 2 p.m. at Bemis Hall. The performance is the second annual Ronna Cooper Memorial Concert (a gift from Margo Cooper in celebration of her mother’s life) and is sponsored by the Friends of the Lincoln Council on Aging. Washington has received the Boston Blues Festival Lifetime Achievement Award and seven Blues Music Award nominations, and released five CDs. Beadle has performed around the world and won numerous awards. The Duke Robillard rhythm section (Bruce Bears on keyboard, Jesse Williams on bass, and Mark Teixeira on drums) will play backup. For more information, call the Council on Aging at (781) 259-8811.
Program looks at Lincoln and World War I
The Lincoln Historical Society will present “Lincoln and the Armistice: A Centennial Celebration of the End of WWI” on Sunday, Nov. 11 at 2 p.m. in Bemis Hall. This event, commemorating the 100th anniversary of the end of WWI, recalls the celebration held in Lincoln when the war ended 100 years ago. The program, which looks at Lincoln’s role in WWI and the impact that the war had on the town, will include biographical sketches of Lincoln’s World War I veterans, the awarding of service medals, and a discussion of life on the home front highlighting the role of Lincoln and New England women. There will also be a display of World War I artifacts, tastings of period foods, and renditions of patriotic songs from the period.
“Once Upon a Mattress” at L-S
The LSB Players, the theater performance company of Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School, will present Once Upon a Mattress, the musical based on The Princess and the Pea by Hans Christian Anderson, in the L-S Kirshner Auditorium on Wednesday through Saturday, Nov. 14–17 at 7:30 p.m. Directed by Carly Evans, music-directed by Michael Bunting, and conducted by Tom Grandprey. Tickets (15 for adults and $8 for students and senior citizens) may be reserved by e-mailing LSBtickets@gmail.com.