The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

My Turn: Group of residents endorses Rundell for Planning Board

Dear friends and neighbors,

We have followed with interest the unfolding of this year’s election for Planning Board and appreciate the issues of the South Lincoln neighborhood, of which many of us are a part, and also the town as a whole. Seeking experienced, balanced, and professional representation on the Planning Board, we endorse Rick Rundell for the role and invite you to join us in supporting his candidacy with your vote.

Rick’s statements in the community forum, the views he has shared on LincolnTalk and in the Lincoln Squirrel, his record on the board since 2013, and his global industry engagement all speak to his thoughtfulness, willingness to consider opposing points of view, and balancing individual and neighborhood advocacy with the interests of Lincoln as a whole. This is exactly what we expect from our elected officials. The professionalization which he has contributed to the board’s operation during his tenure also reflects exactly what we all should expect from our town boards.

We agree with Rick that today, more than ever before, it is important for our town to be led by creative, active, and engaged citizens bringing a broad and experienced perspective to our local challenges and opportunities. If you value the engagement of our citizens and community in public process; objective, respectful and fair treatment of all stakeholders; and the appropriate role of town government in our lives and property, please join us in voting for Rick Rundell for Planning Board.

Signed, your neighbors and citizens of Lincoln:

Joan and John Kimball
Dan and Janet Boynton
Mark Goetemann
Rob DeNormandie
Peter von Mertens
Jona Donaldson
Patricia O’Hagan, Alex Chatfield, Lucy Chatfield
Ken and Pam Hurd
Rachel Mason
Joe and Dana Robbat
Patrick and Judith Lawler
Peter and Susan Sugar
Sandra and Josh Grindlay
Sam Newell
John B. and Ellen S. Newell
Jane Cooper
Barbara Slayter
Katherine Mierzwa
Mary Jo Veling
Kathy Nicholson
Alexander and Helgard Houtzeel
Steve Johnson
Christina Rago Brown
Sarah Andrysiak
Dea Angiolillo
Peter and Faye Speert 
Mary Jo Haggerty
Martin Pierce

”My Turn” is a forum for Lincoln residents to offer their views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Re-elect Rick Rundell and Lynn DeLisi to Planning Board

By Ken Hurd

Although Buzz Constable’s email on LincolnTalk may strike many as a little harsh, he has captured the frustration of many people, including my own at times. My own experience is unique, having served on the Planning Board from 2002 until 2012, and then after my term had ended, having sat across the table as an applicant in front of the Planning Board from 2014 through 2016 as I helped the First Parish Church secure permitting for the Stearns Room addition.

In my opinion, what Ken Bassett and Mary Helen Lorenz describe in their recent letter to the Lincoln Squirrel is accurate. Both projects were significant improvements to their previous iterations despite the objections of a relatively small number of vocal opponents.

To this end, I believe good planning requires vision as well as sensitivity to those affected by change. I also think Allen Vander Meulen in his letter to the Lincoln Squirrel highlighted the key issue at stake; namely “how to resolve the conundrum of approval for large-scale projects in the Lincoln Station area.”

With this in mind, it is my strong opinion that re-electing Rick Rundell and Lynn DeLisi will be in the best overall interests of the town. I would much prefer to have people in public office who are willing to guide and address with an open mind the inevitable changes that Lincoln will continue to face. 

If you haven’t voted yet, I urge you to join me in voting for Rick Rundell and Lynn DeLisi as the best candidates for the job.

Ken Hurd
21 Lexington Rd., Lincoln

”My Turn” is a forum for Lincoln residents to offer their views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Outdoor Town Meeting zips by in 90 minutes

Voters line up in the Hartwell parking lot driveway to check in for Town Meeting on June 13. See more photos below. (Photo by Alice Waugh)

By Alice Waugh

It was a Town Meeting like no other. Instead of lasting hours with hundreds of people packed in a stuffy auditorium, the June 13 event took place in the fresh air under an enormous tent where chirping birds competed with the amplified voices of the speakers. All three warrant articles were approved, and the whole thing was over in less than 90 minutes.

About 150 residents (all in masks) sat alone or in socially distanced pairs under a gigantic tent that occupied most of the Hartwell parking lot, secured by stakes driven through the asphalt. Another 130 who couldn’t fit in the allotted space in the tent sat outside in lawn chairs or on the pavement in the bright sunshine. Questions were submitted in writing and read aloud by runners to minimize microphone handling.

Everyone was given a small orange card to hold up while voting to avoid the need for calling out loudly and perhaps spreading aerosolized virus — but there was a small hitch. Town Moderator Sarah Cannon Holden noted that the town’s bylaws require a voice vote, “so I’m asking you to speak softly and raise your bright orange cards.” A soft chorus of “ayes” signaled each vote.

The agenda was pared down from the 40 warrant articles planned for March to 21 crucial financial articles. Eighteen of those articles focusing on the town budget, including Capital Planning Committee (CapCom) and Community Preservation Act (CPA) items, were unanimously approved with no discussion in a single consent-calendar vote.

As expected, most of the discussion focused on a request by the School Building Committee to move $829,000 from free cash to the school building project to pay for some of the items that were cut when bids came in $3.5 million over budget. Before Covid-19 turned things upside down, the SBC had planned to ask for $2.02 million to restore 19 items at Town Meeting in March. The eight items funded by Saturday’s vote amount were outlined in a June 4 public forum on Zoom.

Several residents were not happy about the SBC request. “The School Building Committee was given a very large amount of money. How many more times will you come to Town Meeting asking for yet more money?” said Jeanine Carlson. “We taxpayers have to live within our budget. Why don’t you?”

“We do not take lightly how much things have changed in the last few months,” SBC chair Chris Fasciano responded, noting that it had significantly scaled down its request since early March based partly on discussions with the Finance Committee. “We have made no decisions about coming back to the town or not coming back to the town. We are in a very uncertain time and we need to see how things unfold before we make that decision.”

Some of the other cuts, such as bike paths and walkways, playground equipment, and new trees, could be restored in the future with funding from sources such as the CPA, CapCom, or a potential Complete Streets Grant. But Fasciano acknowledged that funds that were cut from the budget for furniture, fittings, and equipment will have to be restored, either within the School Committee or SBC budgets, or by direct resident vote. Private donations are also a possibility, although town officials are not permitted to engage in fundraising.

“At some point, some or all of that [$750,000] will need to come back to the town,” he said. Much of that amount will go to replace old and worn furniture, as little or none has been replaced in the past 10 years as the town was trying to finalize a school project.

After the vote, the town still has $1.5 million in free cash, which — along with $2.2 million in the debt stabilization fund — makes up the town’s $3.7 million emergency reserves, FinCom chair Andy Payne said.

Former FinCom member Peyton Marshall also questioned the wisdom of allocating more money for the school.”Many of us in town have had to reconsider or are looking at our plans to remain in Lincoln,” he said. “I think we’ve gone far enough in spending money on town buildings and schools. Should we be prioritizing buildings or people?”

But others spoke in favor of the measure. When she first heard of the request to go before voters, one resident said she thought the SBC must be “very brave or very foolish, but then I read the list and though, ‘My goddess, this is going to impact actual learning in the classroom.” The allocation won’t raise taxes any further, “so it’s not going to show up in our mailboxes, but it will show up in the learning.”

There were about a dozen “nay” votes on the measure seeking $829,000 and three or four against a related measure to transfer $325,000 from the town’s cable TV fund to the cable TV infrastructure in the Donaldson Auditorium, which is normally used for Town Meetings.

Marshall was the only one to vote against the $270,000 Water Department borrowing request. Water Commission chair Ruth Anne Hendrickson explained that $125,000 of that was needed due to “the same sad story” — a previously funded item where bids came in over budget. She outlined the needs in detail before a June 9 public forum on Zoom.

In July, consultants will begin studying long-term options for Lincoln’s water supply, including switching to water from the MWRA. And starting next year, Water Department capital requests will go before the FinCom and the CPC before coming up for Town Meeting votes. This hasn’t been the case before, because the department operates as an enterprise fund independent of the town budget, whereby revenues from user fees are supposed to cover most of its costs.

Click images below for expanded versions and captions:

[Best_Wordpress_Gallery id=”145″ gal_title=”Town Meeting 2020-2″]

My Turn: A time for civil discourse

By Bob Domnitz

In their recent letter to The Squirrel, Ken Bassett and Mary Lorenz have mischaracterized my role in two cases that came before the Planning Board during my previous tenure.

Below, I will provide details that refute their claims. But if you read nothing else, please know this: a Planning Board member must be responsive, fair, and consistent, even when the issues stir emotions. It is regrettable that Ken and Mary’s message does more to divide than unite at a time when we need to build bridges toward a stronger future in Lincoln.

With respect to the mall’s redevelopment 15 years ago, Ken and Mary may be confusing the roles that the ZBA and the Planning Board played in that process. Here is what happened. The ZBA was approached by the Rural Land Foundation (owner of the mall) for relief from the town’s restrictive parking requirement. The ZBA declined to grant that relief. The Planning Board believed that this was an important project for the town and we all wanted the project to go forward. To achieve that goal, I helped draft the South Lincoln Overlay District zoning that enabled the mall redevelopment. The new zoning and the redevelopment proposal were unanimously supported by the Planning Board and overwhelmingly approved by Town Meeting.

With respect to the expansion of the First Parish Church, readers should be aware that all three candidates in this Planning Board election were members of the Planning Board at the time that project was before the board. Our discussions were collegial, and we converged on an approval for the project in a single evening of discussion after a public hearing that extended over several sessions.

The key issue in the First Parish project was the setback to a side lot line that had been created when the Flint family gave land to the church. The church wanted to build to within 7 feet of that lot line. Because of the unusual circumstances that created the lot line, the board was able to find a way to allow a 10-foot setback without creating a worrisome precedent that could be used by other nonprofit institutions elsewhere in town. However, we could not find a rational basis for granting the smaller setback of 7 feet that was desired by the church. The church appealed the Planning Board’s decision to the ZBA and they were granted the additional 3 feet that they needed for their project to proceed as designed.

I believe both the Planning Board and ZBA did a good job fulfilling their roles in this process. The Planning Board deals with zoning that must be applied consistently throughout the Town, and that’s why the Planning Board had to consider the precedential effect of its decision. But zoning can be a blunt instrument, and the ZBA exists to weigh the issues in exceptional cases such as this one.

The entire First Parish experience was extremely emotional for the town. There was tremendous pressure on the members of the board from all sides. It was an unforgettably difficult time for all of us. The fabric of the town was wounded, and it remains wounded to this day. This is clear from Ken and Mary’s attack against me. It is unfortunate that Ken and Mary’s misunderstandings and mischaracterizations only revisit old wounds and do not help us come together to heal.

Bob Domnitz
2 Mill St., Lincoln

”My Turn” is a forum for Lincoln residents to offer their views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Who can best craft a workable plan for South Lincoln?

By Allen Vander Meulen

I admire the experience and track record of all three candidates for the two open Planning Board seats. If electing competent, thoughtful candidates to the Planning Board is the only concern, all have proven themselves worthy.

One major point of contention, and really what (in my mind) should be the single largest differentiating factor between the three, is the issue of how to resolve the conundrum of approval for large-scale projects in the Lincoln Station area — or anywhere in town, for that matter.

The problem is that the mechanism by which the will of the town is made known on such issues — through a Town Meeting vote — is unworkable: the perception potential investors and developers have is that the substantial investment they must make to draft and gain all the necessary approvals before ground is broken on a major project is at great risk by what they perceive as a roll of the dice at a Town Meeting vote. Recent history (in the form of Lincoln’s vote at the 2012 Special Town Meeting to defeat the proposed school project) proves this is a valid concern. No developer has approached the town with a proposal for a major project in the Lincoln Station area for at least 15 years, and that will not change as long as the current mechanism for approval of such projects remains in place, unchanged.

Now, I want to emphasize: I’m talking principle (town and Town Meeting control over the approval process) vs. mechanism (a single final vote at Town Meeting) vs. perception (of potential investors and developers). All three candidates agree the principle will not change. But for potential developers to perceive Lincoln as a viable candidate for such development, the mechanism must change.

Therefore, what sort of changes to our current process must we make to preserve the principle of the town having control over approval of a project while at the same time assuring potential developers that if they adhere to “the rules,” then their significant investment in getting a project approved in Lincoln will not be at risk due to a whim or last-minute controversy? I am not saying we should eliminate the Town Meeting vote or its central role in the process. What I am saying is that how we accomplish this must be rethought.

The SLPIC Lincoln Station zoning proposal was a start at the creation of such a mechanism. However, lack of transparency, an oversized committee, and some major missteps in communication doomed it. It is clear that the Planning Board, which will always be at the heart of this entire discussion, has learned some important lessons from the furor that arose when the proposal was first published and is retooling their approach in light of the lessons learned.

I am very interested to see if any of the three candidates can provide a vision for a path towards a solution that will address this challenge, and if they will be a positive force within the Planning Board as the task of crafting such a solution proceeds.

Based on what I’ve heard and read from Rick Rundell, he understands this challenge quite well and has the vision, political finesse, and skills needed to craft a workable solution (if anyone can). I have not yet heard or seen evidence that either of the other candidates have either a workable proposal in mind to resolve this, or the vision necessary to create one. So, which candidate (if any) I will vote for as my second choice in the coming election is still an open question.

Allen Vander Meulen
Beaver Pond Road, Lincoln

”My Turn” is a forum for Lincoln residents to offer their views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: 48 residents endorse Domnitz and DeLisi for Planning Board

Dear friends and neighbors,

Monday’s vote for Planning Board is significant, and we the undersigned, 48 of your Lincoln neighbors, offer the following perspective.

Over the past year, we became aware of a sweeping and profound zoning change taking shape in the Planning Board’s advisory committee (SLPIC). The proposal was designed to smooth the way for developers to move large-scale development projects directly through the Planning Board. We are but a few of the over 200 families who live within what would have been the new “South Lincoln Village Zone,” joined here by impacted neighbors and other allied residents. Our neighborhood is currently a mix of single-family and multi-family homes, condos, and apartments that are both owned and rented, and it’s about five times as dense as the rest of town.

We challenged the proposed zoning bylaw because it permitted four-story buildings with 20 units per acre, built right to their lot lines. The new zone would have covered roughly 30 acres and paved the way for hundreds of new condos and/or apartments to our small, congested neighborhood without requiring project approval by Town Meeting. For example, they modeled a net potential gain of 271 units over only four of the 27 properties within the new zone.

Through organizing, collaborating, raising our voices, and attending many Planning Board and SLPIC meetings, we gained some insight into the three candidates for Planning Board. We invite you to join us in voting for Bob Domnitz and Lynn DeLisi. Lynn is the only current member of the Planning Board who voiced her opposition to this ill-conceived and harmful proposal. Being the lone voice over many months was no doubt tiring and isolating, but Lynn has persisted in elevating our concerns over the impact on our diverse neighborhood.

Bob Domnitz seeks to keep ultimate approval authority for these kinds of major development projects — i.e. a housing development twice as dense as Oriole Landing — with the town, not the Planning Board. He has seen many consequential development projects succeed by working with town boards and then earning town support. He has served on the Planning Board before, and we hope you will join us in bringing his experience and his fresh perspective to the important decisions facing the Planning Board in the coming years.

The Planning Board is reframing SLPIC and revising the zoning proposal. We hope that they will continue to respect the concerns of those members of our community most impacted by major zoning changes in South Lincoln. We all hope for thriving local businesses, community space, optimized commuter rail use, and decreased carbon emissions. Let’s task our Planning Board with also preserving the affordable housing options we currently have and maintaining the appropriately scaled development we treasure.

Signed, your South Lincoln Neighbors who live within the “South Lincoln Village Zone”:

John Dorr
Bayhas Kana and Sara Postlethwait
Yaman Kana
Kim Leigh-Manuell
Mark Levinson
Jason and Jessica Packineau
Veena Ramani and Adam Stark
Mary Rosenfeld
Sarah Schuller
Michael Welch

Signed, families living in close proximity to the proposed “South Lincoln Village Zone”:

Mark Ahern
Diana Bercel
Liz Burton
Vanessa Cartwright
James and Bonnie Echmalian
Denise and Eric Gieseke
Iris Hoxha
Katrin Kriz
Ada Lee and John Po
Isabel Lee
June Matthews
Thomas Moran
Catherine Moritz
Constance and Richard Ohlsten
Lisa Parker
William Schiano
Melissa Shea
Lisa Slater

Signed, Lincoln residents who join with our South Lincoln neighbors on this issue:

Jamie Banks
Pauline Curtiss
Christopher Dale
Erica Gonella and Shakil Aslam
Jane Herlacher
Maria O’Brien Hylton
Liz Lieblich
Julie Lynch
Caroline and Mark Nordstrom
Barbara Peskin
Jeannine Taylor

”My Turn” is a forum for Lincoln residents to offer their views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Planning Board candidates square off at well-attended forum

More than 60 residents packed a room (on Zoom) on Thursday night to hear from the three candidates running for two Planning Board seats in the June 15 election. In the forum organized by resident Sharon Antia, the trio answered questions about issues facing the Planning Board and the town more generally: South Lincoln rezoning, how to support businesses during the pandemic, affordable housing, and more.

Challenger Bob Domnitz, a former Planning Board member who was ousted by Gary Taylor in 2015, said he was running to regain his seat when “I realized the Planning Board was serious about bringing a zoning amendment before Town Meeting to make the Planning Board the decision-maker on major projects” by majority vote, he said. “That didn’t fit in with the nature of Lincoln as I knew it, and it’s antithetical to how we operate as a community.”

Under a proposal unveiled last year by a subcommittee of the former South Lincoln Planning and Implementation Committee (SLPIC), mixed-use projects would be allowed in areas around the mall and the MBTA station with s site plan review and a special permit from the Planning Board. With that permit, housing projects could be up to 20 units per acre, and a greater maximum lot coverage (60% for residential and 100% for business) would be allowed. However, Town Meeting approval would not be required unless a proposed project exceeded the special-permit density.

Incumbent Rick Rundell pushed back, saying it was “an absurd position” to imply that the Planning Board could take away power from Town Meeting without residents’ consent. (The SLPIC proposal was initially slated for a Special Town Meeting vote in the fall, but the Planning Board withdrew its proposal after encountering opposition.)

“How did they misread the character of this town so much that they worked on a proposal to take away Town Meeting authority for major projects?” Domnitz asked later in the forum.

“I had no idea what was going on [with the SLPIC subcommittee proposal] or I would have fought it,” incumbent Lynn DeLisi responded.

Rundell, who said he was recruited to the board in 2013 by Domnitz, argued that its duties should not focus on “fossilizing the town in a certain state” and that it has become more transparent since he was the chairman in 2014-15. The board has also “sunsetted” the requirement for site plan reviews after five years. “Today’s Planning Board has made light-years of progress since 2015,” he said.

Some of the questions focuses on what the Planning Board could do to help the town in this time of Covid-19. Incumbent candidate Lynn DeLisi suggested a public health center somewhere in town to promote vaccination once a vaccine becomes available.

The pandemic is a major challenge for both developers and prospective occupants of affordable housing. However, changing zoning regulations now to encourage more affordable housing and demographic diversity is not a good idea, the candidates agreed.

“I think we need to take a breath, wait a few months, and see how things settle out,” Domnitz said. “We may be heading towards a totally new world or at least a new equilibrium, and we need to go cautiously at this point.”

“I’m not sure the Planning Board can necessarily take the lead and make decisions about any of this. These are dialogues we need to have with people in the town,” DeLisi said.

The bigger question, Rundell said, “is whether we want to put a wall around our community and preserve the status quo… or be a part of a larger society, and I don’t think the town is at all aligned on that choice.”

Social diversity in Lincoln is certainly desirable, “but we can’t legislate that. All we can do is set up economic possibilities to create the kind of diversity we’re talking about,” Domnitz said. However, “getting some geographic diversity on our major boards would be constructive,” he added. Few if any current town board and committee members are residents of North Lincoln — although Domnitz is — “and the view from here is a little different than the view from elsewhere in town.”

As to where and how more affordable housing should be built, “does it have to be developing more dense housing in South Lincoln? I think it can be in other ways,” DeLisi said.

The candidates agreed that the SLPIC subcommittee’s efforts to reimagine South Lincoln were flawed but not about how to fix the process. The “sprawling” nature of SLPIC and its subcommittees meant that the effort was “not as transparent or receptive to input as it could have been,” Rundell acknowledged.

The board voted on June 9 to reconstitute SLPIC as a five-member South Lincoln Planning and Advisory Committee (SLPAC) but disagreed on the size of the new panel and who should be represented on it. Four of the five board members approved a group comprising only elected officials, “but I advocated very strongly for a member to be a resident from the affected area, and I was shot down by the other board members and I don’t understand why,” DeLisi said.

The parent board rather than a subcommittee should be responsible for coming up with future rezoning proposals, even though it will create more work and long meetings, Domnitz said. “This is very important and should take place within the Planning Board itself… the board needs to realize they own what that subcommittee is doing.”

Asked about the 2009 Comprehensive Long-Range Plan that was never acted on, Domnitz said, “The plan is vague, let’s put it that way…  It’s much easier for people to deal with a tangible proposal than an abstract concept.”

“I mark it as a failure of leadership that there was not real follow-up to that plan,” Rundell said. “Absent planning, Lincoln is going to be like a ship in a storm without rudders or sails and will soon find itself on the rocks.”

From the candidates’ opening and closing statements:

“My motto is ‘Responsible planning by collaboration with neighborhoods’ — that says it all.”
— Lynn DeLisi

“The Planning Board is on the wrong track. We need to put it on a better track so something actually happens in South Lincoln.”
— Bob Domnitz

“Respect for the past and planning for the future with integrity, fairness, and transparency…
Look at today’s board and how they operate, and give your vote to a forward-looking candidate.”
— Rick Rundell

A look at procedure and agenda for Town Meeting

A diagram of drop-off and parking areas, rest rooms, etc. for Saturday’s Town Meeting (click to enlarge).

Voter check-in for Lincoln’s first al fresco Town Meeting starts at 8:15 a.m. on Saturday, June 13, and it’s guaranteed to be significantly shorter than the usual multi-hour affairs.

The meeting starts at 9:30 a.m. under a large tent (capacity with social distancing: 150) in the Hartwell parking lot. Voters, who must wear masks, will get a preassembled packet with handouts, a voting card, paper, and a pencil for writing down questions. There will be a first-aid station with hand sanitizer, extra masks, water, etc., and volunteers who hand things out will be wearing gloves and masks.

For those who can’t attend, the town is live-streaming Town Meeting on Facebook. This allows residents to watch and and listen remotely, but not to vote, ask questions or participate in discussions. Click here to view (a Facebook account or password are not required).

The agenda includes 22 articles, but 19 of them are on the consent calendar, meaning they will be voted on as a bloc to save time, though attendees have the option of calling out individual items for separate discussion and voting. The other three articles are appropriations for the Water Department ($270,000 in borrowing), the School Building Committee ($828,945 transfer from free cash), and an annual free-cash article to balance the budget and/or reduce the tax rate.

Normally, a quorum of 100 residents is required to make a Town Meeting official in Lincoln, but the Board of Selectmen has the option to reduce that quorum to as few as 10 residents if necessary. The option came about after Gov. Baker recently signed legislation relaxing the Massachusetts Town Meeting quorum rules.

The board will meet virtually at 8:45 a.m. on June 13 to discuss whether, with Town Moderator Sarah Cannon Holden’s input and approval, it should lower the quorum to ensure that Town Meeting can undertake its responsibilities. The decision will rest partly on the rate at which residents are trickling in for the Town Meeting.

Before the Covid-19 state of emergency was declared, the original warrant signed on February 24 had 40 articles. They included some nonessential financial items and several citizens’ petitions asking voters if they would:

  • hear reports from town boards on the status of the community center project
  • change the name of the Board of Selectmen to the Select Board
  • support the proposal of the eighth-grade Warrant Article Group to support the Parkland School students’ organization, March for Our Lives, to end school shootings and shootings all over the country
  • adopt a resolution in support of various federal, state and local actions to combat climate change
  • adopt a new section in the town’s General Bylaws called the Polystyrene Reduction By-Law
  • require Lincoln retail establishments to charge a fee for non-reusable check-out bags
  • prohibit food establishments in Lincoln from using and distributing disposable plastic straws, stirrers, and splash sticks

There will be a Special Town Meeting in the fall to consider the items omitted on Saturday, as well as anything else that comes up between now and then that needs a town-wide vote.

Library to offer curbside lending soon, but FOLL takes a hit

The Lincoln Public Library is now accepting returns in its book drop and plans to offer contactless curbside pickup of books reserved online by patrons once a tent to cover its handicapped parking area has arrived.  

The book drop accepts returns of items borrowed from any library in the Minuteman Library Network. Nothing is due until June 30, and the grace period has been extended from one day to four days to allow items to be quarantined. Patrons will still not be allowed in the library building for the time being. 

Meanwhile, the Friends of the Lincoln Library (FOLL) has taken a big hit since the advent of Covid-19, when Bemis Hall was closed to donations of used books and the monthly book sales were halted. But the FOLL is once again collecting used books and is now selling them online via Amazon.com.

Residents can drop used books in the bins at the Lincoln Mall and Tracey’s Service Station, where they’ll be collected by FOLL’s online book sales partner and kept in a warehouse for several days before any of their staff touches them (no books will be handled by Lincoln’s FOLL volunteers). Books that meet the threshold for profitable sale will be offered online for buyers searching for used book titles, and FOLL will receive a percentage of the profit from the sales to support the library’s needs. Books that don’t meet the threshold will be donated by FOLL’s  partner to organizations that need books, such as prison libraries and children’s book foundations.

Please do not leave books at Bemis Hall. To protect the health of the seniors who receive services from the Council on Aging in Bemis, any books left there will be discarded immediately. CDs, DVDs, or any item other than books cannot be accepted. Anyone who would like a receipt form for donations may email FOLL@lincolntown.org.

Supporters can also have Amazon.com donate 0.5% of the price of their eligible purchases to the FOLL. Go to smile.amazon.com and specify “Friends of the Lincoln Library Inc” as your charity of choice; the donation will be made automatically for all of your Amazon purchases thereafter. Click here for more information.

The FOLL funds all of the library’s special programs, projects, and special equipment. Given the age profile of its volunteers and the cramped quarters in the Bemis Hall basement where monthly book sales take place, they don’t expect to resume the sales until a vaccine for Covid-19 becomes available. Click here to donate directly to the FOLL.

My Turn: Recommitting ourselves to addressing racism and educating our students

By the L-S Teachers’ Association

Dear communities of Boston, Lincoln, and Sudbury,

We, the members of the Lincoln-Sudbury Teachers’ Association, unequivocally condemn the senseless killing of Black people and the chronic injustices perpetrated against people of color in our country.

We are devastated by the recurring loss of Black lives, the brutalities inflicted on people of color, and the impact of these social injustices on all of our communities.

Today we recommit ourselves to addressing racism and educating our students — and one another — about the pervasiveness of racism in all its forms. We call on everyone in our communities to have the moral courage to stand with us and to work for justice.

We believe that education is among the best solutions to the scourge of racism in our country. Many of us have already engaged our students in our virtual classrooms to help them understand the complexity of current events. Furthermore, in keeping with L-S’s core values, we seek to teach our students to foster caring relationships, to respect differences, and to cultivate community with an empathetic, compassionate heart.

Today, we, the LSTA, join our administration in accepting the challenge of our times and reaffirming our commitment as educators and Americans to create a nation with liberty and justice for all.

Respectfully,

The Lincoln-Sudbury Teachers’ Association

”My Turn” is a forum for Lincoln residents to offer their views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.