• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscription Info
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Previous Issues
    • Submit Your Work
    • Subscribe/Donate

news

Modern technology sheds light on Revolutionary War battle in Lincoln area

December 4, 2016

Minute Man National Historic Park. The area in the red box is shown in an expanded view below (click to enlarge).

Minute Man National Historic Park. The area in the red box is shown in an expanded view below (click to enlarge).

parkers-revenge1

The brown shaded area indicates the Parker’s Revenge archeological study area (click to enlarge).

The Friends of Minute Man National Park have released the final archaeology report on the Parker’s Revenge battle – the April 19, 1775 encounter in which Captain John Parker engaged the British regulars on their march back from Concord through Lincoln to Boston.

Parker was commander of the Lexington colonial militia that exchanged fire in Lexington on the first morning of the Revolutionary Way. Eight militia were killed (including Parker’s cousin Jonas) and the Americans fled. But that afternoon, colonials ambushed the British at several points during their return march to Boston, including at a sharp bend in the Battle Road in Lincoln now known as the “Bloody Angle.” The Parker’s Revenge skirmish took place further east around the current Lexington/Lincoln town line. (The Bloody Angle fight is memorialized in a painting and document now hanging in the recently renovated basement of Bemis Hall.)

The 320-page report summarizes historical research on the battle, details the full range of technologies deployed in the archaeological research, and describes battle tactics likely utilized by both colonial and British forces. The project findings are especially noteworthy in light of the fact that only one brief witness account the battle has ever been identified by historians.

Twenty-first-century technologies utilized in the research informed formal excavations and 1775 battlefield reconstructions included 3D laser scanning; GPS feature mapping; and geophysical surveys including metallic surveys, ground penetrating radar, magnetic gradient and conductivity/magnetic susceptibility. Taken together, the technologies enabled researchers to locate a farmhouse that figured prominently in the battle terrain, to recreate the actual 1775 battlefield landscape and battlefield features, and even to model exactly what combatants could and could not see at various positions along the battle road.

A musket ball recovered during the archeological study.

A musket ball recovered during the archeological study.

Artifacts discovered included 29 British and colonial musket balls from the battle. The location and spatial patterning of the musket balls recovered enabled archaeologists to interpret the exact positions where individuals were standing during the battle—and then outline battle tactics most likely deployed.

“Using an integrated approach to interpreting this battlefield enabled us to literally peel back time and expose the artifacts that tell the story of Parker’s Revenge,” said project archaeologist Dr. Meg Watters.

The report indicates that Captain Parker positioned his men at the edge of a wood lot on an elevated slope above the battle road. This particular site had two distinct advantages: it provided a clear view to see the advancing British forces and the landscape featured a number of large boulders and trees that provided cover.

A view shed is an area visible from one specific location in a landscape. Archaeologists ran a computer simulated view shed analysis taken from the perspective of a 5’5”-tall marching British soldier and also from the point of view of a mounted British officer (nine feet above ground). The analysis indicated that the undulating terrain surface, combined with other obstacles, meant the British force could not easily see the position of the Lexington militia until it was in close proximity.

Category: history, news Leave a Comment

Property sales in September and October

December 4, 2016

  • House-1111 Old County Rd. — Patrick and Alida Zweidler-McKay for $1,235,000 (October 31)
  • 219 Sandy Pond Rd. – Mary S. Lyman, trustee to Jason H. and Lucia Chu $879,000 (October 28)
  • 16A North Commons – Peter N. Daniel to Marissa Lisec for $249,640 (October 21)
  • 165 Bedford Rd. – Brien B. Daniels to Peggy and Colleen Fong for $550,000 (October 21)
  • 80 Tower Rd. — Bradley Clifford to 80 Tower MCH LLC for $400,000 (October 21)
  • 245 Aspen Circle — Joseph E. DiFranco to Martin Deacutis and Cynthia Sheriff for $485,000 (October 19)
  • 15 Stonehedge — Diane F. Haessler to Seth C. and Lynne B. Miller for $775,000 (October 19)
  • 99 Tower Rd. — Stephen J. Sakowich to Mark Bazin and Jennifer L. Lachey for $818,750 (October 17)
  • 211 Sandy Pond Rd. – Erik R. Babayan to Authur H. Thornhill III and Lucy B. Lower for $1,900,000 (October 7)
  • 93 Tower Rd. — Ruth F. Potter to Seppo Tapani Rinne and Jocelyn Westport Rinne for $810,000 (October 7)
  • 8 Silver Hill Rd. — Robert Laurent Cannon, trustee to John and Robin Peters for $830,000 (September 30)
  • 1 Millstone Lane — Michael S. Fee to Brent K. and Sarah T.M. Benjamin for $879,000 (September 30)
  • 178 South Great Rd. — Kenton J. Ide to John Bockoven Jr. for $700,000 (September 29)
  • 82 Virginia Rd., Unit B10 — Bruce Sorrentino to Mary A. Pilecki for $406,000 (September 16)
  • 331 Hemlock Circle — Neil Baumgarten to Ellen Z. Hazen for $619,001 (September 16)
  • 15 Todd Pond Rd. — Joel A. Kahn to Tristram Oakley and Robert A. Stringer for $1,265,000 (September 15)
  • 12 Airport Rd. — Civil War Preservation Trust to United States of America Minuteman Park for $42,000 (September 14)
  • 0, 1, 6, 8 and 10 Millstone Lane — Winthrop W. Harrington Jr. Trust to Joseph A. Wheelock and Andronica Stanley Wheelock for a total of $4,450,000 (September 9)
  • 138 Sandy Pond Rd. — Cambridge Trust Co., trustee to Alexander J. Taylor and Amy R. Anthony for $855,000 (September 7)
  • 144 Sandy Pond Rd. — Philip A. Copper to Ventianni LLC for $2,895,000 (September 7)
  • 106 Concord Rd. — Lucy M.A. Cotoia to Nicholas and Lindsay Cotterpond for $535,000 (September 1)

 

Category: land use, news Leave a Comment

Letter to the editor: thanks for election help from Town Clerk

November 22, 2016

letter

To the editor:

I think it’s fair to say that this election was a truly epic undertaking—16 days from start to finish, 4,000 total votes cast (roughly half during the 100 hours of early voting). And we’d like to thank every one of you who helped to pull it off:

  • from the volunteer poll workers who helped staff early voting as well as the polls;
  • to our election chef, who kept us happily fed;
  • to the DPW crew, who constructed some and installed all of our signage, not to mention setup and breakdown of the polling place;
  • to the coordinated police presence at the polls, in the parking lot, and on escort duty;
  • to the hospitality of Smith School staff;
  • to the great coverage of the Lincoln Journal, the Lincoln Squirrel and local cable;
  • to the volunteer support staff who helped us carry the load at the office;
  • to the four high school students who took the initiative to sign up, train and serve as part of the closing team;
  • to the Smith School teachers who made a visit to an operating polling place part of their curriculum that day;
  • and, of course, to the indefatigable and indefatigably good-natured assistant and deputy town clerks and their likewise generous and patient families.

Well done! And thank you!

Sincerely,

Susan Brooks, Town Clerk


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: letters to the editor, news Leave a Comment

Flint’s Pond dam to get upgrade

November 21, 2016

damPerhaps ironically in this year of drought, the Flint’s Pond dam will be getting some rehab work this winter to make sure it can withstand a 50-year flood.

A hydraulic evaluation  required by the Office of Dam Safety indicated that the dam would overtop during a 50-year flood because the current spillway is undersized, said Water Department Superintendent Greg Woods. When water overflows a dam beyond its spillway capacity, it erodes soil and other material whose weight holds the dam in place, putting it in danger of failure.

Construction signs on Sandy Pond Road and Baker Bridge Road will alert motorists to the fact that trucks and equipment will be entering and exiting via a temporary easement being constructed at 67 Sandy Pond Road to access the dam site, which is at the southeast corner of Flint’s Pond. Work could begin as soon as December, and while the contract calls for the work to be completed in 75 days, the contractor will probably have to return in the spring to finish work on the ground cover, Woods said.

The town’s water supply and water quality will not be affected by the work, mainly because the water level is so low, although engineering plans were developed under the assumption that Flint’s Pond was at normal capacity. The cost to the town will be $125,000.

Category: news, Water Dept.* Leave a Comment

Clarification

November 21, 2016

magnifying-glassThe headline and a sentence in the fifth paragraph of the story headlined “Sale closes on Wang property; town will be asked for $850,000” have been modified to clarify that voters will be asked to appropriate more than $850,000, with an as-yet-unspecified additional sum to be requested for building an athletic field. The story has been changed to reflect these clarifications.

Category: land use, news Leave a Comment

Residents hear about affordable accessory apartment proposal

November 15, 2016

houseA proposed bylaw change would make it easier for homeowners to create accessory apartments in Lincoln as a means of increasing the town’s supply of affordable housing.

The Affordable Accessory Apartment Program is a public/private partnership between individual homeowners and the town whereby homeowners rent accessory apartments to tenants who earn 60–80 percent of the area’s media income, Lincoln Housing Coalition member Pamela Gallup explained at last week’s State of the Town meeting. (The Housing Coalition is a collaboration among the Housing Commission, the Affordable Housing Trust and the Lincoln Foundation.)

Homeowners would have an incentive: a loan of up to $25,000 from the town to create or renovate an accessory apartment. The loan would secured by a lien on the property but would not contingent on the homeowner’s income, and it would have to be repaid in full when the house is sold. The property would also have a 15-year deed restriction, although it could be terminated with 60 days’ notice at the end of a tenant’s leaser term. In addition, the homeowner would get a property tax exemption for the accessory-apartment portion of the house.

To qualify under the program, each affordable accessory apartment must have a separate entrance and off-street parking, and must not exceed 1,200 square feet or 35 percent of the home’s square footage. Prospective landlords would also have to submit certified architectural plans and demonstrate that their septic system is adequate. After receiving a special permit from the Zoning Board of Appeals, they would have to select tenants from a waiting list of those who applied to the town.

The goal of the program is to create 10 new affordable accessory apartments that qualify for inclusion on the town’s subsidized housing inventory before the 2020 census. Ten percent of every Massachusetts town’s housing must be affordable, and Lincoln is currently at 10.9 percent. Gallup said. That figure is projected to fall to 10.08 percent by 2020. If the ratio falls below 10 percent, developers would be allowed to build affordable housing without following the town’s zoning rules on density, setback, height, etc.

Qualifying income limits for tenants range from $38,363 to $51,150 for a single person and $54,788 to $73,050 for a family of four. Fair market rent as calculated by the federal government for Lincoln would be $1,029–$1,372 per month for a one-bedroom unit.

The program would have the advantages of spreading affordable housing throughout the town, creating a source of income for homeowners, and providing housing options for town employees, single people and young families, Gallup said.

Lincoln currently has about 70 known permitted accessory apartments and an unknown number of unpermitted units. If some owners of those units converted their apartments to meet state guidelines and got special permits, the town could increase its affordable housing inventory without any new construction.

The town itself owns and manages seven units of affordable housing, though there are also privately owned units in Lincoln Woods and The Commons.

Resident Tom Sander suggested that the town collect loan repayments before the house is sold so some of the money can be reinvested in the program. He also suggested prioritizing homeowner applications according to how close they are to the train station, making it more attractive for commuter tenants.

In answer to an audience question, Gallup said renters must re-verify their income with the town each year to remain qualified for the apartments; if their income rises above the guidelines, they have 18 months to move out.

For the program to go forward, residents must approve three things at Town Meeting in March: amendments to the accessory apartment bylaw to conform with state Department of Housing and Community Development rules, creating the homeowner property tax exemption, and allocating Capital Planning Committee funds for the loan program.

“There’s absolutely no downside for the town in going into this program, as far as I can see,” said former Planning Board member Bob Domnitz.

Category: news Leave a Comment

Correction

November 15, 2016

correction-smA November 14 article headlined “Benefits and hurdles for solar array at landfill discussed” used an incorrect abbreviation when saying that a solar array at the transfer station could have “a capacity of 1.4 mW” (milliwatts). It should have said “a capacity of 1.4 MW” (megawatts). The original article has bene edited to reflect this correction.

Category: news Leave a Comment

Benefits and hurdles for solar array at landfill discussed

November 14, 2016

solarA report by the Solar PV Working Group concluded that the best site for a municipal solar photovoltaic array is the capped town landfill, with the roof of the public safety building coming in second.

Solar Design Associates, a consulting firm hired by the solar working group, looked at 25 potential sites in town. A solar array at the transfer station could have a capacity of 1.4 MW, while a roof-mounted array on the public safety building could generate 58.6 kW. Selectman Renel Fredriksen summarized the report at the November 12 State of the Town meeting and said the group hoped to have a proposal to vote on at Town Meeting in March.

If and when a site is selected, the town would sign an agreement with a private firm to purchase, install and maintain the solar PV equipment, and in return,  the town would receive lease payments and/or reduced electricity costs. In a 2015 report, BlueWave Capital said a solar installation on the landfill site could produce more than 50 percent of Lincoln’s municipal electricity.

One problem, though: the landfill is now designated as conservation land, and state law requires that if the town wants to open it to solar use, it must designate another parcel of the same size to offset the loss to the town’s inventory of conservation land. Officials had hoped that part of the Hargreaves-Heald property purchased by the town earlier this year could be used for this purpose, but the state has since said that this was not acceptable.

Removing land from conservation status requires unanimous approval by the Conservation Commission and two-thirds majority votes by Town Meeting and the state legislature.

The town and Minute Man National Historic Park would also have to renegotiate the easement given by the park to the town for access from Route 2A to the landfill. There is a “polite disagreement” with the park about what uses are permitted by that easement, “but once have a concrete proposal, we’ll resume that conversation,” Town Administrator Tim Higgins said.

Once a Lincoln School project is underway, the Ballfield Road campus is promising site for a future municipal solar PV array, as is the soon-to-be-rebuilt Minuteman High School, Fredriksen noted.

In the meantime, “there’s lots that we can do now to to change our electricity use, like getting a home energy assessments or buying more renewable energy,” said Green Energy Committee member Sue Klem, adding that residences account for 80 percent of electricity energy in town.

 

Category: conservation, government, news Leave a Comment

Final election results show Lincoln voted ‘yes’ on Question 2

November 11, 2016

A more complete (though still unofficial) tally of Lincoln’s election results shows that Lincolnites voted in favor of expanding charter schools—and was one of very few Massachusetts cities and towns to do so.

Preliminary results that were sent to the Squirrel on Tuesday night contained a typographical error in the results for Question 2 that seemed to indicate Lincolnites voted against raising the cap on charter schools. In fact, Lincoln voted by a margin of 1,988–1,768 to raise the cap, and was one of only 15 towns to vote yes. The others were Weston, Wellesley, Dover, Sherborn, Manchester, Mt. Washington, Cohasset, Chatham, Orleans, Nantucket, and four of the five towns on Martha’s Vineyard.

The next-closest margin for a ballot question in Lincoln was the vote of 2,018–1,765 in favor of legalizing recreational marijuana.

The tables below show results by voting precinct, excluding blanks and write-ins. Click here to see a map showing the two Lincoln precincts.

CandidatesPrecinct 1Precinct 2Total
PRESIDENT and VP
Clinton and Kaine1,8201,0862,906
Trump and Pence328285613
Johnson and Weld9778175
Stein and Baraka242347
U.S. REPRESENTATIVE
Katherine Clark1,8481,1663,014
COUNCILLOR
Marilyn Devaney1,6811,0652,746
STATE SENATOR
Michael Barrett1,7221,0972,819
STATE REPRESENTATIVE
Thomas Stanley1,3327832,115
Stacey Gallagher Tully6435331,176
SHERIFF
Peter Koutoujian1,7331,0922,825


BALLOT QUESTIONSPrecinct 1Precinct 2Total
QUESTION 1: Additional slot parlor license?
Yes392334726
No1,8321,1282,960
QUESTION 2: Allow up to 12 new charter schools per year?
Yes1,1868021,988
No1,0896791,768
QUESTION 3: Prohibit confinement of farm animals?
Yes1,8411,1803,021
No443304747
QUESTION 4: Legalize recreational marijuana?
Yes1,1868322,018
No1,1066591,765

Category: government, news Leave a Comment

Obituaries

November 10, 2016

John P. Kennedy

John P. Kennedy

Alan Krentzel, 65 (November 3) – computer information consultant; tai chi and qigong teacher.

John P. Kennedy, 80 (October 15) — former accountant and St. Joseph’s Church congregant.

Category: news, obits Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 95
  • Page 96
  • Page 97
  • Page 98
  • Page 99
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 157
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Change in leadership, new lifelong learning program at The Commons July 24, 2026
  • My Turn: Clarify who’s responsible for damage from falling tree limbs July 23, 2026
  • Legal notice: ZBA (Aug. 6, 2026 hearing) July 23, 2026
  • Options clarified on library HVAC system July 22, 2026
  • Police log for July 8–19, 2026 July 21, 2026

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Advanced search

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2026 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.