• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscriptions
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Issues
    • Submit your work

land use

Letter to the editor: on McLean, act with compassion and support, not fear and anger

August 3, 2016

letter

To the editor:

I am not a medical professional (although I spent years as an IT expert, working closely with the physicians and staff at some of the largest and most prestigious medical institutions in the world). Nor am I an abutter of the McLean property on Bypass Road, though I am a Lincoln resident and active in the town’s political processes and governance.

My personal perspective on the issue of the proposed McLean adolescent facility is informed by my growing up within a block or two of a large residential psychiatric hospital in Vermont—the Brattleboro Retreat, which is a near-twin of McLean’s main campus in Belmont. In addition to this, I’ve had a great deal of relevant experiences by virtue of a past marriage to someone suffering from what multiple mental health professionals later suggested was probably undiagnosed BPD [borderline personality disorder], and also by virtue of my present (second) career as a minister.

The Brattleboro Retreat had patients of all sorts, from the violently insane (the last time I walked through the campus, there was still an unused building with heavy bars on its windows) to young outpatients similar to those who will be at the proposed McLean facility, some of whom were my childhood friends. In my ten years as a boy in the area—attending nearby schools, running, playing and riding my bike in the neighborhoods adjacent to that institution, building “forts” and climbing trees in the large woodland adjoining that hospital, in my occasional encounters with patients as they took walks in the park or downtown streets, or having a part in the annual Christmas pageant our church performed at an auditorium within that hospital—I never felt threatened or afraid. That hospital was (and still is) a place of healing, compassion, caring and hope.

In my career as a minister, I’ve met many folks in need of, or benefitting from, the care available through places like McLean and The Brattleboro Retreat. I’ve counseled those dealing with the pain of loved ones who died of suicide, and officiated over their funerals; and I’ve known and ministered to numerous people with BPD, severe depression, PTSD, anxiety and numerous other mental health challenges. What I’ve learned from such experiences is that everyone with a mental illness of any sort is still a human being. They are all valuable, worthwhile people—just like you and me. And, in the case of this facility, they will be well supervised and cared for by competent professionals.

Specifically, and speaking from my own long (and sometimes painful) experience, those with BPD pose no threat to the peace and well-being of their neighbors. On that score, I would have no qualms about living in or owning a home adjoining the McLean property. The young people who will be there and those working with them need our friendship and support, not our judgment and condemnation. They are not violently insane—believe me! They are young folks learning how to cope in healthy ways with a world that they often find to be hostile and confusing. There is nothing to be afraid of. They will not break into neighboring homes or attack people in their back yards. I am certain that the facility and its activities will be nearly invisible to both its neighbors and those who pass by, as nearly all such facilities are.

Apparently because the process of vetting McLean’s application is not going as some wish it would, accusations have been made that impugn the character of some in leadership positions here in town. Knowing some of those people as I do, I am certain such accusations are baseless, and are certainly of no help in achieving an outcome that is acceptable to all.

We have all heard about the concerns regarding too much traffic being generated for the shared drive that leads to this facility, and concerns about the impact on neighbors and the facility’s conformance to zoning and sanitation laws (among other things). Having no expertise in such areas, I cannot speak to them directly, but I do know that the “powers that be” in Lincoln take those concerns and the law very seriously, and are determined to do their job in as fair and balanced a manner as possible. Those who represent the interests of this town and its residents in this matter cannot, should not and will not make decisions that undermine or violate those laws, and my review of the minutes from the Planning Board meeting of June 28 dedicated to this very issue confirms this.

Lincoln is a town that has long been known for being compassionate and very deliberate in “being there” for those in need of a chance for a better life. We are a town that has long done an excellent job of anticipating and accommodating change. We are a town that cares about people, the land and the environment.

All I’m saying is this: as we respond to McLean’s proposed facility, let’s act with the measured and thoughtful care and deliberation that we in Lincoln are known for. Let’s talk, discuss and find mutually beneficial common ground—not just with McLean Hospital’s representatives, but with each other. We need to take care so that all voices and concerns are heard, and that McLean is a good and responsible neighbor—as many here in town, and McLean’s representatives, seem to be trying to do. And in pursuing that goal, let us approach the questions that remain to be answered out of a spirit of openness to learning, and out of compassion and support, not out of fear and anger.

Sincerely,

Allen Vander Meulen
30 Beaver Pond Rd.


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: government, land use, letters to the editor Leave a Comment

McLean psychologist downplays risks of Bypass Road facility

August 3, 2016

mcleanBy Alice Waugh

In an August 2 interview with the Lincoln Squirrel, a senior medical executive at McLean Hospital refuted the notion that the occupants of a proposed residential facility on Bypass Road would be violent or pose a risk to neighbors, contrary to fears of neighbors who have spoken out against the plan in a controversy that has spilled onto the pages of the Boston Globe.

McLean is proposing a 12-bed facility in a former private home at 22 Bypass Rd. that will offer dialectical behavioral therapy as part of a psychoeducational program to young men aged 15-21, who will live there for periods of weeks to months.

In a July 8 letter, Building Inspector Daniel Walsh acknowledged that “the issue is murky,” noting that both sides cited the same court case to support their arguments. However, McLean’s proposed use has “multiple objectives which include residential along with therapeutic and educational functions,” he noted. Case law as well as federal and state anti-discrimination laws indicate that McLean’s proposal qualifies for the Dover Amendment zoning exemption for religious and educational uses of a residential property, he concluded.

Walsh’s opinion concurs with an earlier statement by Town Counsel Joel Bard. However, neighbors disagree and are expected to file an appeal with the Zoning Board of Appeals and perhaps a court challenge if necessary.

On July 26, the Planning Board closed the public hearing on the site plan review, which is looking only at parking, traffic and visual screening and cannot pass judgment on the use of the property. The board will vote at its September 13 meeting.

Also at issue is the allowable number of beds, which is limited by the capacity of the property’s septic system. At the moment it is rated for seven beds plus staff. To accommodate 12 live-in residents plus staff, McLean would have to apply to the town’s Board of Health and/or the state Department of Environmental Protection to enlarge the septic system.

Boston Globe face-off

The battle made its way into the Boston Globe last week in a feature called “The Argument” that presents both sides of a current controversy. Lincoln residents Jennifer Morris, who favors the Lincoln proposal, and Dr. Steven Kanner, an abutter and Lincoln Board of Health member who opposes it, made their cases for and against the facility in the July 29 article.

“I’m quite certain the program will serve an educational purpose. As a parent, I felt highly unqualified to teach a disturbed adolescent how to cope, how to interact, how to study and progress,” Morris said. For his part, Kanner argued that a diagnosis of borderline personality disorder or BPD, which many residents of the proposed facility will have, is “a medical treatment unit reimbursable by medical insurance,” and that what McLean wants to offer is “patently a medical program and no more uniquely educational than other psychiatric treatment.”

A poll at the end of the Globe article asks readers which side they’re on. As of the evening of August 2, the votes in favor of the proposal were ahead by an almost two-to-one margin (62% to 38%).

Levandusky explains BPD and DBT

The Bypass Road facility will house “young men with a variety of issues that could be partially related to BPD, or less BPD and more mood or anxiety disorders. It’s not a one-diagnosis program,” said Dr. Philip Levandusky, senior vice president for business development and communications and director of McLean’s Psychology Department.

People with BPD have problems regulating emotions and thoughts; they exhibit impulsive and reckless behavior and have unstable relationships with other people, according to the National Institutes of Mental Health. Many also have co-occurring disorders such as depression, anxiety, substance abuse and eating disorders, along with self-harm and suicidal behaviors.

Those with BPD are “much more likely to have co-occurring depressions and anxieties and are not overtly assaultive or aggressive, “ Levandusky said. Violent behavior “is not a hallmark characteristic of people with BPD; if anything, self-harm may be more of a risk.”

Residents will be housed at the Bypass Road facility on a voluntary basis. While they will face locked doors and be forbidden from leaving the building without supervision, “it is not a secure setting in terms of having bars on the windows,” Levandusky said. However, McLean Hospital has more than 100 voluntary beds of this type, and it is “extraordinarily rare that we have people leave the program against our expectations,” he added.

McLean also operates another residential facility on Old Cambridge Turnpike in Lincoln for adult men and women, some of whom “have been stepped down from McLean Hospital” and periodically return there as part of their treatment, though no problems in Lincoln have ever been reported, Levandusky said. It was “within the realm of possibility” that the Bypass Road facility could include McLean Hospital “step-down” residents at times, he added.

Dialectical behavioral therapy (DBT) “is very clearly an educational experience,” Levandusky said. “It is teaching skills and doing homework assignments, and there is an expectation that the skills will be practiced.” Medical insurance will pay for a limited amount of outpatient DBT, but the Lincoln facility and others like it are for “a person likely to have had other types of experiences that were not as effective as hoped, and this can offer a more intensive kind of setting to engage in the psychoeducational process.”

“Fear of the unknown”

Is Levandusky surprised at the negative reaction to the Bypass Road proposal? “No,” he said. “It’s human nature; people don’t understand psychiatric conditions and psychological problems, or don’t necessarily understand the nature of psychoeducational programs in this day and age.” People are also subject to “fear of the unknown and [making]  catastrophizing assumptions,” he added.

Asked specifically about the concerns expressed by Kanner, a primary care physician and a former chief of medical services for the state Department of Mental Health, Levandusky said, “We all have our things… obviously Dr. Kanner has certain perceptions of what we’re going to be doing there that are radically different from what we are going to be doing there.”

Category: land use, news Leave a Comment

Public hearings coming up

July 28, 2016

House-1Planning Board

Public hearing on Tuesday, Aug. 9 at 7 p.m. in the Town Office Building to review an application for Site Plan Review. The applicant, Seth Miller, 15 Stonehedge, proposes to construct a new home.

Zoning Board of Appeals

Public hearing on Thursday, Aug. 4 at 7:30 p.m. in the Town Office Building to hear and to act on the following petitions under the Zoning Bylaws:

  • Nancy Riemer and Lawrence Peltz, 10 Morningside Lane, to construct a vestibule at the front door.
  • Robert Fallon and Jennifer Monaghan, 23 Boyce Farm Rd., to convert an existing pool house into an accessary apartment by adding approximately 667 square feet.
  • Environmental Stewardship Associates and St. Anne’s-in-the-Field Church, 149 Concord Rd., to install solar panels on the garage at the rectory.

Historical Commission

Public hearing at 7:45 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 9 in the Town Office Building to consider the application of Rob and Elizabeth Orgel for a demolition plan review to demolish the dwelling and detached carport at 237 Old Concord Road.

Public hearing at 8 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 9 in the Town Office Building to consider the application of Joseph and Andronica Wheelock to demolish the dwelling at 6 Millstone Lane.

Historic District Commission

Public hearing at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 9 in the Town Office Building to consider the application of Jonathan Ferris for the demolition of an existing addition and a new addition to be built with a one-story glass breezeway to connect the main house with the existing garage at 38 Lincoln Road.

 

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Open Space and Recreation Plan being updated

July 20, 2016

openspaceThe Conservation Commission is spearheading the effort to update the Open Space and Recreation Plan (OSRP) and is planning a pair of public forums and an upcoming online survey.

The commission is working with a residents’ advisory group and a environmental consultant on the OSRP, which was last updated in March 2008. AS explained in the introduction, the document “re-affirms Lincoln’s core natural resource, agricultural and recreational values. It provides a guiding framework that can be used to maintain and enhance the ‘green infrastructure’ of the community, and it identifies pressures and opportunities that may influence the future character of Lincoln.”

The OSRP includes an environmental and open-space inventory and outlines how the Conservation Commission and Lincoln Land Conservation Trust (LLCT) work together to manage Lincoln’s 2,000+ acres of conservation land, as well as the community’s vision and statement of needs.

The community survey and public forums aim to gather input on residents’ priorities for open space and recreation in town. They are also an opportunity to share maps and information on Lincoln’s history of creative land development and protection. The forums will be on the following dates:

  • September 14 at 7:30 p.m. — Recreation Department
  • November 16 at 7:30 p.m. — Town Office Building

The survey is being developed and will be distributed online and at various locations around town from August 1 to September 30.

Advisory Group meetings take place in the Conservation Department in the Town Office Building on Thursday mornings at 7:30 a.m. See the Conservation Department web page for dates (under the heading “Open Space Planning”). Also on that page is a link to the Advisory Group’s timeline and tasks. Members (all of whom are Lincoln residents except Pomponi) are:

  • James Craig (Board of Selectmen)
  • Jordan McCarron, Richard Selden (Conservation Commission)
  • Patty Donahue (Parks and Recreation Commission)
  • Lynne Bower (Agricultural Commission)
  • Ellen Meadors (Board of Accessors, LLCT)
  • Buzz Constable, Gwyn Loud (LLCT/Rural Land Foundation)
  • Renata Pomponi (Mass. Audubon Society)
  • Jennifer Hashley (Codman Community Farms)
  • Michele Grzenda (Weston Conservation Agent

Category: conservation, government, land use Leave a Comment

Property sales for June

July 20, 2016

  • House-1343 Hemlock Circle — Cynthia Williams, trustee to Michael Jordoff Trust and Nancy Jordoff, trustees for $534,100 (June 1)
  • 16 Bypass Rd. — Zachary Burnett to McLean Hospital Corp. for $1,024,500 (June 1)
  • 22 Bypass Rd. — Burnett Remodeling LLC to McLean Hiospital Corp. for $1,700,000 (June 1)
  • 35 Deerhaven Rd. — Mary Rurth Trubiano, trustee to David J. Jensen, trustee for $810,000 (June 2)
  • 25 Tabor Hill Rd. — Steven Wardell to Marc Czapczynski and Coren Milbury for $1,100,000 (June 7)
  • 332 Hemlock Circle, unit 332 — John Konvalinka to Steven Emmerich and Eve Horwitz for $545,000 (June 9)
  • 82 Virginia Rd., unit 205 — Judith Dolan to Andrew and Emily Pollack for $347,000 (June 9)
  • 12 Sunnyside Lane — Frederic Eppling, trustee to Robert Peattie and Adeline Kim for $675,000 (June 9)
  • 3 Blueberry Lane — Walter Ehrlich to George and Sonya Najarian for $1,487,000 (June 10)
  • 9 Hiddenwood Path — Susan Decapo to Andrew Frisch for $780,000 (June 16)
  • 85 Lexington Rd. — Cathryn Long, trustee to Jeremy Wilbur and Elaine Shapland for $1,345,000 (June 17)
  • 11 Boyce Farm Rd. — Mark Deck to Kurt MacLaurin for $1,395,000 (June 17)
  • 237 Old Concord Rd. — Henry Morgan, trustee to Robert and Elizabeth Orgel, trustees for $1,050,000 (June 17)
  • 113 South Great Rd. — Rebecca Hussey to Reyza Marouf for $999,000 (June 20)
  • 109 Old Sudbury Rd. — John Shupe to Sandys Bureau, trustee for $1,215,000 (June 27)
  • 49 Bedford Rd. — Brian Flaherty to Lara and John MacLachlan for $957,000 (June 29)

 

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Letter to the editor: McLean educational use is ‘semantic fiction’

July 10, 2016

letter

To the editor:

I am one of the many neighbors who are challenging McLean’s right to locate a treatment center on Bypass Road. Carol Kochmann’s overwrought defense of McLean Hospital’s attempt to establish a psychiatric treatment facility in a residentially zoned neighborhood completely misses the point of the community’s objections and concerns (“Feeling ‘shame’ for Lincoln,” Lincoln Squirrel, July 2, 2016).

No one in the Bypass Road neighborhood disagrees with the fact that McLean is a preeminent medical institution, with the resources and expertise necessary to treat adolescent males afflicted with borderline personality disorder. Nor does anyone dispute that McLean was instrumental in helping a member of Ms. Kochmann’s family overcome crippling anxiety and depression.

What I object to is the fact that our town’s zoning bylaw prohibits the placement of psychiatric treatment facilities in residentially zoned areas and McLean is attempting to circumvent these bylaws by mischaracterizing the nature of its facility. Notwithstanding Ms. Kochmann’s barbed critique of our motivations, I see nothing shameful in reminding the town’s boards and employees of their legal obligation to administer Lincoln’s zoning bylaw fairly and with due regard for the people who live here.

My disagreement with McLean is not about the good work that they do, but rather the rules and laws that determine where they can do it. Our zoning bylaw strictly limits the types of uses and structures that can be located in a residential district. The state statute known as the Dover Amendment allows nonprofit educational institutions an exemption from local zoning bylaws if, and only if, the proposed use is “educationally significant” and education is “the primary or dominant purpose for which the land or structures are to be used.” McLean is proposing to place in the middle of an established residential neighborhood a locked psychiatric ward where adolescent males will be administered intensive “dialectical behavior therapy” as well as “psycho-pharmaceutical treatment.”

Again, without questioning the laudable nature of this activity, the primary purpose of this use is clearly medical treatment, not education, and therefore not eligible under Lincoln’s bylaws to be sited in our residential neighborhood. If this same facility were located at McLean’s Belmont campus. there would be no question but that this use were medical or therapeutic, not educational. It is only when McLean wants to locate its new facility in a residential neighborhood that it engages in semantic fiction and characterizes the purpose of its treatment facility as primarily educational.

Finally, while Ms. Kochmann’s opinions appear to be squarely based on her daughter’s positive experience at McLean, she fails to realize that what is being proposed for the Bypass Road neighborhood is a fundamentally different program than what benefitted her daughter. McLean acknowledges that this is the first time they will attempt to treat adolescent males suffering from borderline personality disorders (BPD) in a residential setting. According to the National Institute of Mental Health, BPD is “characterized by impulsive and reckless behavior” with “high rates of co-occurring disorders including self-harm, suicidal behaviors and completed suicides.”

The facility will be fully locked, “for our safety” we are told, and no patient will be allowed outside without supervision. It is plain to see why such a program requires the security of an on-campus setting and is wholly inappropriate in a residential neighborhood. Under these circumstances, my concerns about McLean’s treatment facility are neither irrational nor selfish, and I would hope that Lincolnites like Ms. Kochmann would make an effort to understand the nature and complexities of the neighborhood’s opposition before pronouncing otherwise.

Sincerely,

Jay S. Gregory
46 Bypass Rd.


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: land use, letters to the editor 7 Comments

Landscape designers looking at Lincoln Station area

July 3, 2016

lincoln stationThe Conway School of Ecological Landscape Design and Planning is partnering with the Lincoln Planning Board to develop a site plan that aims to make the Mall at Lincoln Station a lively, multi-use central gathering space for visitors and residents, who are also invited to take a short survey online about the area.

The school will be assessing the Lincoln Station area north of Lincoln Road for possible streetscape and landscaping improvements to create a more cohesive, pedestrian-friendly district, exploring public amenities such as benches, tables, bike racks, pedestrian circulation and crossings, and public gathering areas. They will also study the grassed area behind Donelan’s.

The town will be able to hire a consultant to develop more detailed priorities townwide with the help of a $50,000 grant from the Masssachusetts Department of Transportation’s Complete Streets program, said Director of Planning and Land Use Jennifer Burney, adding that there would be a public forum in early fall.

State funding of up to $400,000 a year may also be available to help pay for the actual improvements starting as early as spring 2017, she said.

 

 

Category: government, land use, news 1 Comment

Letter to the editor: feeling ‘shame’ for Lincoln

July 2, 2016

letter

Editor’s note: The Lincoln Squirrel is on vacation and was not able to attend the June 28 meeting Kochmann refers to. Coverage will resume on July 11. 

To the editor,

The night of June 28 at the Planning Board meeting marked the second time this year I felt overwhelmed with shame for a body of Lincoln citizens. McLean Hospital has proposed the use of 16-22 Bypass Rd. to educate and treat a handful of adolescent males who suffer from depression and anxiety.

Fear was the primary sentiment expressed by residents, an emotion that is no stranger to anyone who listens to the news. Yet, whatever amount of fear citizens feel, multiply that by some unimaginable amount and you’ll have a hint of the fear these young men live with day in and day out.

I thanked McLean on behalf of my daughter who suffered from crippling anxiety and depression. She was so terrified she could barely leave her room and was unable to attend school for two years. After trying everything else, we investigated our only remaining option, a full immersion treatment program. After 90 days she came home remarkably changed.  She had learned the causes of her affliction and methods to deal with it. She had made new friends with whom she was exceptionally close. She attended school this past year every day and achieved excellent grades. She communicates, has made more new friends, and has great insight into herself. She still struggles every day, but she now has tools to help her cope.

After the meeting, I asked my daughter about violence in the Program she attended. She seemed puzzled but eloquently described how the kids relied on and supported each other through their difficult journeys. They became aware of their own and others triggers and learned to avoid them. If they left each other, it was to cry.  Many of her peers had been abused so the last thing they would do was abuse anyone else. One person who got really angry, punched a pillow. This does not seem like the description of a population to be feared.

It’s all too easy to paint mental illness with a broad brush and cry out “not in my neighborhood.” There are huge differences between psychoses and depression and anxiety. Do these citizens of Lincoln really think that McLean would take on the liability of placing such a facility here if they thought its residents might pose a serious danger to the neighbors?

At least two of the people at the meeting knew my daughter quite well before she became ill. I hope that they and the others will read this, face their fears, and use the funds they’re spending on legal counsel to educate themselves and/or to contribute to institutions like McLean. They are trying to solve some of the world’s biggest problems, in this case by working with a tiny subset of youngsters suffering from a specific mental illness that renders them unable to function.

One of the reasons why I moved here was because I was under the impression that, in a pinch, Lincolnites do the right thing. If that doesn’t happen in this instance, the town is changing in ways that I don’t embrace.  That makes me truly sad.

In case you’re wondering when the first time was that I was ashamed this year, it was at the Special Town Meeting where the vote was to withdraw from the Minuteman school district. But that commentary is for another day.

Sincerely,

Carol Kochmann
9 Brooks Hill Rd.


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: land use, letters to the editor 2 Comments

Land use hearings coming up

June 26, 2016

House-1The Lincoln Planning Board will hold a public hearing at 7 p.m. on Tuesday, June 28 to review an application for Site Plan Review. The applicant, McLean Hospital, proposes to designate parking to accommodate a total of 21 spaces at 16 Bypass and 22 Bypass Rd. (see the Lincoln Squirrel, June 15, 2016).

The Lincoln Conservation Commission will hold a public hearing on Wednesday, June 29 at 8:45 p.m., in the Lincoln Town Offices in response to the Notice of Intent by Daniel Pereira for installation of a sport court in the buffer zone resource area at 1-8 Ballfield Rd. in Lincoln.

The Historic District Commission will hold four public hearings on Tuesday, July 5:

  • At 7:50 p.m. to consider the application of the First Parish Church for a minor change to an approved plan to construct an addition to the Stearns Room at the white church, 4 Bedford Rd.
  • At 8 p.m. to consider the application of Rob and Elizabeth Orgel to demolish the dwelling and detached carport at 237 Old Concord Rd.
  • At 8:15 p.m. to consider the application of Timothy Moynihan for approval to demolish a barn in the Historic District at 2 Sandy Pond Rd.
  • At 8:30 p.m. to consider the application of Adrian and Jennifer Fretland to demolish the attached garage and screen porch at 8 Pine Ridge Rd.

The Zoning Board of the Appeals will hold a public hearing on Thursday, July 7 at 7:30 p.m. to hear and to act on the following petitions under the zoning bylaws:

  • Nicholas Whitman and Catherine Shortsleeve, 12 Granville Rd., for an addition onto rear of structure.
  • Gerard and Beth DuToit, 155 Weston Rd., to replace and enlarge existing greenhouse.

 

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Public hearing scheduled on McLean proposal

June 15, 2016

meetingThe Planning Board has scheduled a June 28 public hearing for a site plan review relating to parking for a McLean Hospital proposal to locate a residential educational/therapeutic residence on Bypass Road. The hearing starts at 7 p.m. in the Town Office Building’s Donaldson Rom.

Dozens of residents appeared at a May 24 Planning Board meeting to protest the proposal, which would house up to 12 young men aged 15-21 plus two overnight staff at a large single-family house McLean recently purchased at 22 Bypass Road. Neighbors at the meeting worried about added traffic, headlights late at night, and neighborhood security in the event that one of the patients left the property unattended.

Septic regulations seem to prohibit the property from having more than six bedrooms or being occupied by more than 12 people (including staff), according to a May 12 letter from Assistant Public Health Director Stanley Sosnicki. However, he added in a June 14 email to the Lincoln Squirrel that this was “an opinion based on limited information provided at the time… and does not adequately address the nature of staff members and instructors at the property.” McLean will make a formal submission with more information so he can more accurately assess the projected septic flows for the new use, Sosnicki said.

Representatives from McLean did not immediately reply to an email requesting comment.

Category: land use, news Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 33
  • Page 34
  • Page 35
  • Page 36
  • Page 37
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Water bills to go up by 13% March 5, 2026
  • News acorns March 5, 2026
  • Property sales in January 2026 March 4, 2026
  • My Turn: Unraveling the Hanscom misallocation March 3, 2026
  • Police log for Feb. 19–25, 2026 March 3, 2026

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2026 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.