• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscriptions
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Issues
    • Submit your work

land use

Public hearings coming up

September 20, 2018

Planning Board

There will be a public hearing on Tuesday, Sept. 25 at 7 p.m. on two proposed changes to the zoning bylaws relating to marijuana businesses in Lincoln. Residents will be asked to vote on the measures at a Special Town Meeting on October 20.

Zoning Board of Appeals

The Zoning Board of the Appeals will hold a public hearing on Thursday, Oct. 4 at 7:30 p.m. to hear and to act on the following petitions:

  • Myra Ferguson, 14 Baker Bridge Rd., for transfer of a special permit for an accessory apartment.
  • Richard Hermann, 25 Bypass Rd., for renewal of a special permit for an accessory apartment.
  • Alex MacLean, 23 Conant Rd., for renewal of a special permit for an accessory apartment.

Category: government, land use, news Leave a Comment

Hearing focuses on marijuana businesses in town

September 11, 2018

The Planning Board will be conducting a public hearing on Tuesday, Sept. 25 at 7 p.m. at Town Offices for the purpose of reviewing two marijuana-related bylaw proposals that will be voted on during a Special Town Meeting on October 20.

The first of the two bylaws proposes to extend the existing recreational marijuana moratorium from November of this year until June 2019, to provide the town with more time to complete public education and outreach, to develop alternative bylaw proposals and to schedule the required town meetings and election.

The second bylaw asks the town to consider enacting a ban on all forms of commercial recreational marijuana, including cultivation, retail sales, manufacturing, and testing. This requires a two-thirds majority to pass. The vote on the proposed full ban will occur first because:

  • The results of a town-wide survey last spring indicate that a strong majority favors a full ban.
  • In the event the full ban fails to achieve the required two-thirds majority, we will have time to prepare partial ban alternative bylaws for a vote in March.
  • A total ban could be reversed by a future vote of Town Meeting.
  • Operating under a full ban would provide time to learn from the experience of other communities.

Before voting on the full ban during the October 20 Special Town Meeting, voters will hear a presentation from the Marijuana Study Committee that explains the law and the pros and cons of the various options.

Officials urge interested citizens to attend the public hearing to hear a presentation from the Selectmen’s Marijuana Study Committee. Also on the group’s website is an FAQ document and a link to the video of an April 2018 public forum on the issue of marijuana businesses.

Category: government, land use Leave a Comment

Property sales in July

August 16, 2018

  • 9 Stratford Way — Neil H. Aronson trust to Demetri and Marie Pascale Sideras for $1,870,000 (July 31)
  • 270 Lincoln Rd. — Andre Coleman to Pierre-Guy Douyon and Celine Yang for $750,000 (July 30)
  • 9 Birchwood Lane — Roger Stoddard to John and Catherine Crabtree for $630,000 (July 20)
  • 243 Aspen Circle — Robert H. Curtiss Trust to Mitchell G. Eckel III Trust for $579,000 (July 19)
  • 10 Sweet Bay Lane — Kristina Ryan to Michael Chang and Joanne Lyons for $1,900,000 (July 19)
  • 8 Sweet Bay Lane — Kristina Ryan to Michael Chang and Joanne Lyons for $575,000 (July 19)
  • 24 Old Sudbury Rd. — Lawrence Kroin Trust to Tristan Rooks for $1,000,000 (July 18)
  • 233 Concord Rd. — Lynn B. Weigel Trust to 233 Concord Road LLC for $662,500 (July 17)
  • 23 Brooks Rd. — Massimo Grasso to Anasuya Mitra for $928,000 (July 17)
  • 1 Cedar Rd. — Timothy Callahan to Adela and Kimberly Palencia and Adam Doffini for $580,000 (July 16)
  • 27 Tabor Hill Rd. and Old County Rd. — William C. Carey to Christopher and Asako Csendes for a total of $2,447,500 (July 16)
  • 11 Stratford Way — Ian Blumenstein to Walter McCarty for $1,950,000 (July 16)
  • 0 Weston Rd. and 75 Weston Rd. — George Hibben to Reuven and Orli Klier Avi-Yonah for $1,450,000 (July 11)
  • 44 Greenridge Lane — Joan Platt Dolinsky to Timothy Brunelle for $455,000 (July 10)
  • 17 Giles Rd. — Robert S. Orgel Trust to Diana Jong for $1,350,000 (July 10)
  • 10 Linway Rd. — George A. Coleman Trust to Andrew and Sandra Coleman for $900,000 (July 9)
  • 32 Greenrridge Lane — Johannes Perkins to Elizabeth Slater for $494,000 (July 2)
  • 4 Morningside Lane — Anne Marie Rose Previte Trust to Heather Sheridan and Phyllis Wampler for $990,000 (July 2)

Category: land use 1 Comment

Public hearings coming up

July 31, 2018

Zoning Board of Appeals

The Zoning Board will hold a public hearing on Thursday, Aug. 2 at 7:30 p.m. to hear and to act on the following petitions:

  • John Briedis, 27 Canaan Drive, for renewal of an accessory apartment special permit.
  • Shu Chen, 117 Lincoln Rd., for transfer and renewal of an accessory apartment special permit.
  • Center for Dental Medicine and Reconstructions/Cambridge West 2 LLC, 152 Lincoln Rd., for special permit for change of tenant and use.
  • Apolinaras Sinkevicius, 124 Tower Rd., for a special permit to add a raised wooden deck and add a new room above the garage.
  • Neil B. Middleton, 45 Weston Rd., for a special permit to install a new higher-pitched roof, add exterior insulation to walls, and install a new entry canopy.

Historical Commission

The Lincoln Historical Commission will hold a public hearing at 7:30 p.m. on Tuesday, Aug. 7 to consider the following applications:

  • James Dwyer, to demolish the existing structure at 233 Concord Rd. 
  • Christopher Eliot and Patricia Stuart, to demolish the existing attached garage at 124 Bedford Rd.

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Special Town Meeting vote on marijuana businesses planned

July 26, 2018

The town will schedule a Special Town Meeting this fall to vote on extending the current moratorium on recreational marijuana businesses in Lincoln and whether to seek a full ban on such businesses.

Massachusetts legalized recreational marijuana sales in 2016, but individual cities and towns can choose to opt out of marijuana growing, processing, testing or retail businesses. Lincoln narrowly voted to legalize recreational marijuana in the state election in 2016; as a result, any future partial or full ban in Lincoln must be approved by a two-thirds majority at Town Meeting and by a simple majority at a later ballot vote.

In March 2017, Lincolnites approved a temporary moratorium on cannabis businesses while residents decided on a permanent course of action. That moratorium is set to expire on November 20, but the town has the option of extending it for a limited period of time. This fall’s Town Meeting vote will seek to extend it until June 30, 2019.

At the fall vote, residents will also be asked if they want to institute a full ban on all cannabis businesses. If two-thirds say yes, the town will seek to affirm that vote at the ballot box after the spring 2019 Annual Town Meeting. “We’re fairly close to two-thirds now in terms of support for a full ban,” Selectman James Craig noted at the board’s June 19 meeting, referring to results of a town-wide survey mailed to residents in April.

If the two-thirds bar isn’t met, the Marijuana Study Committee will seek more feedback with another survey “so we can really drill down on what appetite the town has for commercial development ore retails sales” of cannabis products, Craig said. The Planning Board would then draw up proposed zoning amendments to regulate businesses and would bring them to a Town Meeting vote in spring 2019.

If the town does nothing, the state could begin issuing licenses to marijuana-based establishments in Lincoln once the moratorium has expired, as noted in the FAQ document posted by the committee in April.

Selectmen emphasized that any town-wide action on cannabis businesses will not affect the personal rights granted under the 2016 statewide legalization of recreational marijuana. Under the new law, Massachusetts residents 21 and older may use, grow and possess marijuana products. Individuals may possess under 10 ounces of marijuana inside their homes and under one ounce in public, as well as grow up to six marijuana plants in their homes (or 12 plants in households with two adults). Public consumption and driving under the influence of marijauan remain illegal.

There will be another public forum on marijuana businesses in Lincoln in October. “We want to make sure people understand what they’re voting on” at the Special Town Meeting later in the fall, Craig said.

Category: agriculture and flora, government, land use Leave a Comment

Property sales in June

July 23, 2018

82 Virginia Rd. #B411 — Debra Taylor to Carol Bickford for $420,000 (June 29)

5A South Commons — Ronald Golay to Kathleen Sullivan for $460,000 (June 26)

17 Stonehedge — Henry Cretella to Joseph Soucy and Norana Cavanao for $1,315,000 (June 26)

3 Smith Hill — Gita Srinivastava to Piyush and Gari Srinivastava for $1,150,000 (June 26)

84 Davison Drive — Belinda Gingrich Trust to Xiaoran Fu and John Carr for $1,492,500 (June 22)

102 Lincoln Rd. — Steven Tanabe to Ephraim Lessell for $590,000 (June 22)

97 Lincoln Rd. — Susan Jones to Timothy Clark and Kate Johnsen for $1,400,000 (June 22)

10 Twin Pond Lane — Roger Cody to Antje and Sebastian Barreveld for $2,288,000 (June 21)

12 Hiddenwood Path — Carolyn L. Buckler Trust for Elana McDermott and Michael DiGiando for $865,000 (June 18) 

7 Linway Rd. — Herman Michael Tannert Trust to Jonathan and Elizabeth Everitt for $885,000 (June 18)

55 Old Bedford Rd. — FFMS Lincoln North LLC to RCS-Bedford (DM) (Parks IDE) LLC c/0 Arsenault Holdings LLC for $19,550,000 (June 15)

# Goose Pond Rd. — Patricia Gray to Robert and Anne McGarr for $1,285,000 (June 13)

 

 

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Property sales in May

July 8, 2018

79 Lincoln Rd. — Elizabeth Levey Trust to Winthrop Estates LLC for $1,535,625 (May 30)

117 Lincoln Rd. — Creighton Alexander to Chen Shu for $1,139,000 (May 29)

256 Lincoln Rd. — Joseph Boyce to Alexandra McLean and Padraic O’Reilly for $1,290,000 (May 23)

11 Lexington Rd. — Zeis Lincoln One LLC to Katherine and Brian Coverdale for $2,700,000 (May 18)

5 Stonehedge — William C. Mason Trust to Manoj and Kiran Manandhar for $729,900 ( May 18)

5 Hawk Hill Rd. — Deutsche Bank National Trust to David Knoerr for $624,000 (May 17)

72 Winter St. — Aliza Wheeler to Edward and Mary Ann Babrich for $1,300,000 (May 3)

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Property sales in April

June 13, 2018

  • 145 Chestnut Circle — Barbara B. Dunn to Daniel and Janet Boynton for $585,000 (April 2)
  • 14 Baker Bridge Rd. — Barbara A. Brannen Trust to Myra Ferguson for $1,300,000 (April 3)
  • 241 Old Concord Rd. —  Wallace P. Boquist to Joanne D. Wise for $950,000 (April 24)
  • 4 Todd Pond Rd. — Mary E. Field Trust to Nathanial Mendell Trust and Dana Kelly Trust for $1,335,000 (April 24)
  • 15 Conant Rd. — Mary Alice Williamson to William and Scarlett Carey for $1,535,000 (April 27)
  • 221 Aspen Circle — Richard Nenneman Trust to Steven and Patricia Gray for $620,000 (April 27)
  • 36 Todd Pond Rd. — Adam Hogue to Jennifer C. Ma for $538,000 (April 30)
  • 116 Chestnut Circle — Patricia Thompson to Stephen Hines and Constance Phillips for $510,000 (April 30)
  • 34 Goose Pond Rd. — Marion P. Crean to Clint and Terry Epperson for $1,009,500 (April 30)

Category: land use Leave a Comment

Panelists share views on marijuana sales and use

May 1, 2018

A panel including a doctor, Lincoln Police Chief Kevin Kennedy, and a cannabis industry researcher and consultant discussed some of the issues Lincoln voters will need to think about when deciding whether or not to permit cannabis businesses in town.

Massachusetts legalized recreational marijuana sales in 2016, but individual cities and towns can choose to opt out of marijuana growing, processing, testing or retail businesses. To enact a partial or full ban, a Town Meeting vote to adopt a zoning bylaw amendment restricting or banning such businesses must pass by a two-thirds majority, followed by a simple majority at a town election. Lincoln’s current moratorium on cannabis businesses expires in November.

  • Read this FAQ document about marijuana businesses from Lincoln’s Marijuana Study Committee

To be allowed to grow marijuana outdoors, businesses must have the crop fenced and equipped with security cameras, and the plants must be out of view of any public right of way, said Ari Kurtz, a member of the Marijuana Study Committee (MSC) and ]the Agricultural Commission. Growers must undergo background checks and can sell only to licensed dispensaries or product manufacturers. Cannabis can also be grown in secure indoor facilities with windows blacked out.

An advantage to the town of allowing marijuana business stems from the host community agreement provision built into the state law whereby the town gets 3 percent of the business’ gross income.

Marijuana could become a billion-dollar industry in Massachusetts by 2020, according to research reported in the Boston Globe last year, “and people ask, why not keep some of the money in the community through tax dollars?” Kurtz said. “Even small-scale growing can be extremely lucrative.” However, marijuana farming requires a large investment up front in licenses, utilities, and equipment as well as security, he added.

If the town were to permit commercial marijuana growing, it could use zoning rules and the site plan review process to limit what areas of town the plant can be grown, odor mitigation, screening from neighbors, etc. Those measures could restrict other types of marijuana businesses as well.

Panelist Jean Welsh, a Lincoln resident, is a cannabis educator and policy researcher. She said she also uses cannabis to help relieve chronic back pain after many other medical treatments had been ineffective. Medical marijuana does have side effects—”you can get inebriated, but you don’t have to, if you understand how to titrate and deliver the dose,” she said.

Welsh advocated making marijuana more affordable and easier to obtain for medical purposes, “but I have no problem if you want to use my medicine for recreation,” she said. “Some people just want to come home at night and chill with some cannabis instead of a glass of wine… and be able to just walk into a shop and see the products available.”

Legal concerns surrounding marijuana businesses center around security and the fact that marijuana is still illegal at the federal level, Kennedy said. This means that businesses can’t access the banking system and must therefore rely on cash transactions, making them a potential robbery target. There are also concerns about children getting easier access to cannabis, as well as the potential for increased emergency room visits for users who become too intoxicated, he added.

“I would encourage Lincoln to opt out of retail [cannabis] businesses,” said Dr. Eden Evins, an addiction researcher and professor of psychiatry at Harvard Medical School. At issue is the potential for easier access by children, especially in newer forms such as oils, vaping and edibles. In adolescents, “repeated marijuana use in adolescents can cause lasting changes in brain structure and function,” she sai

Even though retail sales nationwide are restricted to adults only, its very availability lends an air of social acceptability, Evins said. Tobacco and alcohol are definitely more harmful than marijuana for users of all ages, but for those other substances, “it’s a health issue not just because they’re more dangerous, but because their legal status causes more widespread use.”

Although deaths from marijuana overdose are almost nonexistent, the drug can be addictive, Evins said. Since the 1960s and 1970s, the potency of marijuana has increased significantly, and this has led to increases in admissions to addiction programs for people whose primary complaint is marijuana addiction, she said, adding that 25 to 30 percent of teenagers who use marijuana daily become addicted.

“Everyone in this industry agrees that kids should not have access to cannabis,” Welsh said. Edibles also pose more of a risk because the drug tends to last longer and feel stronger, she added. “If you’re a newbie, don’t do them.”

To give officials a better sense of what the public thinks about marijuana businesses as they mull what rules to propose, Selectman and MSC member James Craig urged residents to return the one-page paper survey that was recently mailed to all homes. There will be a second town forum in September, followed by a Special Town Meeting and special election in October, in addition to the Town Meeting on the school project.

Other area towns are already voting on the issue Winchester has banned all marijuana businesses except testing labs, and Concord has banned all types of businesses. Sudbury will vote on whether to prohibit marijuana manufacture, cultivation or sales on May 7.

Category: government, land use Leave a Comment

School, community center groups respond to Finance Committee questions

April 29, 2018

The current Ballfield Road campus.

Committees for the two campus projects have submitted answers to a series of questions from the Finance Committee in advance of two April 30 meetings on project costs.

A multi-board meeting on the campus projects begins at 6 p.m. in the Hartwell B pod, followed by a joint meeting of the FinCom and the Capital Planning Committee from 7:30–9 p.m. A Special Town Meeting on the projects will take place on June 9.

In their answers to the FinCom, both the school and community center committees recommended against building a school project and a community center at the same time, citing the different projects scopes and timelines, construction durations, and problems in using the campus while two projects were under construction simultaneously.

The Community Center Planning and Preliminary Design Committee (CCPPDC) noted that contractors who are able to build a 160,000-square-foot square foot project such as the school do not typically compete for 23,000-square-foot buildings, and “it is likely that using the general contractor and subcontractors that typically handle the bigger, more complex projects for the smaller community center will actually add cost to the community center.”

The School Building Committee offered some FAQs about cost estimates on its website on April 29. Earlier, the SBC responded to a list of questions from the FinCom on:

  • Factors driving the cost per square foot of the various concepts
  • Enrollment projections
  • Space and cost numbers for comparable projects in other towns
  • Incremental costs of specific features such as a new or renovated Smith gym, renovated auditorium, and hubs for grades 3-8
  • Construction cost inflation and escalation
  • Comparisons to revant data form the Massachusetts School Building Authority
  • Operation and maintenance costs (also asked by the CapComm)
  • What’s included in “soft costs”

The CCPPDC was asked to supply figures and assumptions used for capacity planning for the community center design, and to explain why Bemis Hall can’t be renovated for the Council on Aging. The group’s answers are here, with more information on their research here (click on the “Finance Committee information for April 30” tab in the middle of the page).

In a discussion of the square footage sought for the community center, the CCPPDC noted that even newer community centers in other towns have proved to be too small. “The one town our size that offers a senior facility larger than the senior component of the community center says that they are already short on space,” the committee wrote. “Almost all towns we spoke with, including those with quite new facilities, said that they built too small and now need more space. We do not want to make the same mistakes as other towns by assuming that their facilities are adequate for their population when they are not, especially when these mistakes cost towns more in the long run when additions need to be built.”

Category: community center*, government, land use, news, school project*, schools Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 18
  • Page 19
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 35
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Breyer reflects on Supreme Court career at talk in Lincoln June 5, 2025
  • Select Board endorses Panetta/Farrington Project June 4, 2025
  • News acorns June 4, 2025
  • Corrections June 4, 2025
  • Community center bids come in high; $2.3m fund transfer sought June 3, 2025

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2025 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.