• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscriptions
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Issues
    • Submit your work

Letter to the editor: elect Tully as Lincoln’s state rep

November 6, 2016

letter

To the editor:

When I first heard Stacey Gallagher Tully was running for the office of state representative, I immediately fired off an email asking her to join me for coffee. She was quick to agree to meet with me and I am writing to ask you to consider giving her your consideration in the election on November 8.

Stacey comes from a family with a long history of working on the Kennedys’ campaigns, and Stacey has spent time in D.C. and Georgia working with Jimmy Carter. She too has a long history of public service and is ready to take the step of moving into the legislature. You may have seen Stacey at Donelan’s, at the transfer station or at one of a number of locations. She has come to Lincoln Woods at least two times and at a coffee hosted there last recently she told us of her plans to hold office hours in Lincoln and how much she looks forward to working to bring both communities together to solve issues we have in common.

The obvious issue is traffic. Driving off Route 128 onto Route 20 and then Route 117 is not just a Waltham issue. As most of us know, it has a huge impact on us here in Lincoln. We need a representative that will talk to us, the people of Lincoln, who will work with us, who will be accountable to us. Stacey Gallagher Tully is asking to be that person. She has a proven track record working on senior issues and health issues in Waltham. She has a history of serving the people of her community and would like us to be part of her community.

Contrast this with her opponent Mr. Stanley, who is without a doubt committed to Waltham—but Lincoln, not so much. To be sure, Stanley has helped the administration in Lincoln gain access to the right people in Boston; after 16 years he knows his way around. As for the rest of us in Lincoln, he has been absent. In fact, he is quoted in the recent Lincoln Journal as saying he spends all his campaign time in Waltham. Lincoln is not even on his agenda.

Many of us remember the days not so long ago when we had a state representative who spent time in Lincoln, talked with us, the residents, and worked to serve all of us in Boston, not just the administration. A vote for Stacey Gallagher Tully is a vote for representation of the people, by the people.

Sincerely,

Sharon K. Antia
165 South Great Rd.


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: government, letters to the editor Leave a Comment

ZBA says no to McLean Hospital

November 4, 2016

mcleanThe Zoning Board of Appeals voted 4-1 on Thursday night to overrule a previous finding that a proposed McLean Hospital residential facility is a permitted use of the property under state law.

McLean bought adjoining parcels at 16 and 22 Bypass Road last spring with the intention of putting 12 beds for boys age 15-21 in the large home on one of the properties. The goal was to have boys with borderline personality disorder live there for several months while receiving dialectical behavioral therapy to help them learn to function better.

Lincoln zoning bylaws prohibit uses other than residential in that area, but McLean claimed an exemption under the Dover amendment, which allows religious and educational facilities in residential areas. Building Inspector Dan Walsh and town counsel Joel Bard agreed with the hospital’s claim that the proposal constituted an educational use. But a group of neighborhood residents appealed to the ZBA, which sided with the residents after a hearing that featured much debate over whether the proposed facility was primarily educational or medical/therapeutic.

“I’m certainly a fan of the notion that you don’t have to have traditional classrooms to have it be educational, and I’m favorably inclined to the idea that education is rolled into therapy, but the Dover amendment is not written in a way to say that education is therapy and therapy is education. This is closer to therapy than education,” said ZBA member Bill Churchill.

“The primary end goal is treatment. The curative aspect is the goal here,” said ZBA member David Henken.

“I do think this is treatment. There’s obviously some education involved, but I don’t think it’s the primary purpose,” agreed board member David Summer.

“I don’t think this is an educational purpose that is the intent of the Dover amendment,” ZBA chair Joel Freedman said.

Board member Eric Snyder said he would vote “based on what he read from various doctors” on both sides of the issue. He ultimately cast the lone dissenting vote.

Freedman had a word of caution for those against the proposal, however. “The idea that Dover amendment is something that has come in and usurped local zoning is something I disagree with very much,” he said. “It’s a good thing when a community like Lincoln has to participate in things… that may be distasteful or may not be what they want. There’s no credence to the idea that there needs to be protection here.”

The ZBA achieved the minimum of four votes that are required to overturn the building inspector’s finding. Board member Kathleen Shepard was not at Thursday’s meeting and Vinit Patel recused himself from the vote.

McLean officials declined to comment after the meeting.

Category: government, land use Leave a Comment

Sunrise, sunset

November 3, 2016

sunrise

Harold McAleer’s picture of a sunrise over Farrar Pond shares many of the colors of his earlier photo of a summer sky.


Readers may submit photos for consideration for Lincoln Through the Lens by emailing them to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. If your photo is published, you’ll receive credit in the Squirrel. Photos must be taken in Lincoln and include the date, location, and names of any people who are identifiable in the photo. Previously published photos can be viewed on the Lincoln Through the Lens page of the Lincoln Squirrel.

Category: Lincoln through the lens, nature Leave a Comment

News acorns

November 2, 2016

ballot4

Sample ballot (click to enlarge).

More than one-quarter of voters cast early ballots

As of Wednesday morning, 28 percent of the Lincoln electorate has voted, according to Town Clerk Susan Brooks. Though her office has not been tracking ballots cast by registration, the largest segment of the Lincoln electorate is unenrolled (53 percent), followed by Democrats at 36 percent and Republicans at 11 percent. Registered voters can cast their ballots in the Town Clerk’s Office (16 Lincoln Rd.) through Friday, Nov. 4 at 4:30 p.m. Hours for voting are 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., and until 8 p.m. on Thursday.

Order pies by Thursday to benefit L-S teachers

The deadline to order Thanksgiving pies from the Foundation for Educators at Lincoln Sudbury (FELS) is Friday, Nov. 4. Online and paper orders are welcome. Proceeds support grants to Lincoln-Sudbury Regional High School faculty and staff, allowing them to pursue their professional and personal interests and passions. Click here for the online form, or here to download a paper form. Pies will be available on Tuesday, Nov. 22.

Minuteman mulling middle-school career exploration program

Minuteman High School is looking for feedback from in-district middle school families on whether their children might like to participate in an after-school career pathway exploratory Program, possibly to begin next spring. The program would provide a wide variety of career exploration opportunities and an opportunity for middle school students to identify early on what they love to do and what they do well.

Minuteman will hold an informational evening on Wednesday, Nov. 9 at 4 p.m. in the Paul Revere Room for parents and guardians. Register for this event by taking a brief online survey. Lincoln has voted to leave the Minuteman district, but the departure does not take effect until July 2017.

Lectures on Israel/Palestine

The GRALTA Foundation continues its exploration of the Israel-Palestine conflict with two lectures in November. Boston College sociology professor Eve Spangler will speak on “Understanding Israel/Palestine Through a Human Rights Lens” at the Lincoln Public Library on Thursday, Nov. 10 at 7 p.m. and Sunday, Nov. 13 in Bemis Hall at 2 p.m. Her popular seminar, “Social Justice in Israel/Palestine,” culminates when she leads a trip to the region during BC’s winter break. There is no charge, and light refreshments will be served.

Tea and gift ideas with children’s librarians

Join the children’s librarians for tea, scones and book suggestions for holiday gift-giving for grandchildren and other young readers in your life at a Grandparents’ Tea on Wednesday, Nov. 16 from 4-5 p.m. in the Lincoln Public Library Tarbell Room. This event is open to all adults, not just grandparents.

Category: charity/volunteer, educational, food, government, schools Leave a Comment

Officials discuss ways to tweak Town Meeting

November 2, 2016

crowdHow can Town Meeting be made more accessible for busy parents, the homebound, and others who might like to attend but can’t? Town moderator Sarah Cannon Holden and selectmen brainstormed several ideas at the board’s October 24 meeting.

The topic came up after several residents discussed the matter on the LincolnTalk email list over the summer (list members can find the discussion thread by clicking here—login required).

While some in the LincolnTalk discussion celebrated Town Meeting as a shining example of New England participatory democracy, others said it was inefficient and did not allow for maximum voter participation.

“The current system is akin to holding an election that instead of giving people options, forces them to take an entire day off of  work/family/obligations and sit in a room for 5-7 hours before eventually casting a vote at a not-previously-determined time,” one resident wrote.

Another wrote that the notion of Town Meeting as it’s now conducted is “fairly antiquated” and “seems to indicate that citizens should adapt to the arbitrary choice of government administration instead of adapting the administration  of government to the needs of the citizens.”

“Civic engagement is important, yet I would think a true democracy would find ways to give everyone an opportunity to participate,” wrote a third resident who endorsed the idea of mail-in voting.

At the selectmen’s meeting, Holden and other noted that Lincoln can’t change its form of government without an act of the state legislature. Like the majority of the 351 cities and towns in Massachusetts, Lincoln has an open town meeting form of government (54 have a city/town council and 36 have a representative town meeting, according to the Massachusetts Municipal Association). However, there is some leeway in terms of the timing; Town Meeting can be held over two or more evenings, for example.

Other ideas suggested at the selectmen’s meeting included video-streaming the entire meeting so people could watch remotely and come in to vote when an item of interest came up, or expanding the consent calendar. The consent calendar is a list of warrant articles that officials have deemed non-controversial beforehand and that are voted on as a group, with the exception of individual items for which a resident has requested a separate discussion and vote.

Holden noted that Town Meeting is already divided such that finances and bylaws are usually discussed and voted on in the mornings, with public policy issues coming after the lunch break. She also noted that she does her best to encourage shorter presentations by town officials and trying to limit the length of discussions, though “it’s hard to cut off [a resident] in a sense arbitrarily” or by a set number of minutes or comments.

Holden acknowledged that there was an overflow problem at the Special Town Meeting in 2012, when hundreds of people showed up for an important school funding vote. She announced the vote about 15 minutes ahead of time knowing that the auditorium doors would have to be closed first, since it was sure to be a hand-counted vote as opposed to a voice vote. However, some people were not able to get in because of the crush, and although there was overflow space in the gym next door, it’s unclear whether they were signed in, so they could not vote.

Selectman James Craig said the most frequent suggestion he had heard from those with school-age children was to have a defined time period for all voting, such as 1-2 p.m.

Pushback from selectmen

“I’ve been going [to Town Meeting] since I was a kid, and I have a sort of instinctive sort of pushback” to this sort of change, Selectman Peter Braun said. “This is an important event in our community. It’s really important for people to hear each other and see each other and participate in democracy that a war was fought over originally. I feel a little personal constraint over saying ‘show up when you feel like it and vote when you’re here’.”

Lincoln is not the only town facing this issue. Other towns have tried things like having Town Meeting over two days, “and they all say it doesn’t seem to matter, you get the same response. He suggested that Holden do a benchmark study of “what other towns are doing to try to address these issues.”

Nevertheless, Lincoln’s Town Meeting participation rate is one of the highest in the state, Town Administrator Tim Higgins said.

“This will sound a little harsh, I have to admit… but I have a really hd time understanding why someone can’t hire a babysitter, and one with a car if necessary” for chauffeuring children to activities, said Selectman Renel Fredriksen, noting that she always attended Town Meeting even when her children were very young. “It’s one day a year… if you had a wedding, would you skip it because you had to go to a soccer game? If someone says ‘I can’t go because of X,’ then you’re clearly making it a lower priority than whatever X is. It doesn’t parse for me.” Citizens should know the issues and “show up if they care, and if you don’t care, that’s fine,” she said.

“There’s some truth to that, but at the same time, I do feel like we need to listen,” Craig said.

“The issue is accessibility and disenfranchisement of people who don’t have the ability who literally cannot attend Town Meeting, not their level of care or concern about town issues,” resident Margit Griffith said. “When you’re looking at opportunities to vote, you have to look at people who can’t—not won’t, but can’t.”

At the close of the discussion, Holden said she would look at having more items on the consent calendar, and perhaps distributing more digestible information (in print and online) ahead of time as a way of shortening presentations and questions at Town Meeting.

 

Category: government Leave a Comment

Letters the editor supporting ‘yes’ on Question 2

November 1, 2016

letter

Editor’s note: See previous letters on this issue below.

To the editor:

I have been reading and thinking but not posting about charter schools until now. As I drill down into the arguments, it seems to me that the progressive view as espoused by Sara Mattes, for example, has at its core the desire to maintain political control over the schools. I see charter schools as a disruptive technology, as creative destruction. With creative destruction, something new comes about that completely changes the old paradigm so much that it destroys the old paradigm and replaces it with something different.

I think that those who are opposed to having more charter schools in Massachusetts see this paradigm shift very clearly. At the same time, I find Jay Kaufman’s letter ludicrous. He says that studies show that better teachers are the answer to better schools. If that is the case, why do we not already have them? Why have the schools in the U. S. showed a very clear decline over the past 40 years? There is the concern that parents choosing charter schools will take money away from the public schools. In Lincoln, people are affluent enough that if they do not like the public schools, they pay for private schools—in fact while still paying the taxes to support the public schools. Impoverished urban parents do not have that luxury. Why punish the people in Roxbury out of a desire to protect the Lincoln schools? Charter schools give them a real choice for a better education and that outweighs every other consideration in my mind.

Sincerely,

Colleen Katsuki
226 Old Concord Rd.


To the editor:

I was raised in a family of public schools teachers and educators. I myself taught in the Somerville public schools. I applaud and support public schools that properly educate their students so they can become productive and contributing members of society. And I also support parents who seek alternatives if their schools cannot educate their children.

That’s what many of us in Lincoln have done, made a choice and moved to a community where we were told there were good schools. The only difference between the 33,000 parents who want the best education for their children through charter schools and many of us is their economic status. Low-income and working-class parents don’t have many choices. I support the parents’ right to choose their children’s education. I am concerned that people who will not be affected by the outcome of this vote could vote no and take away other parents’ chance to do what’s best for their child.

I understand public education in Boston because I have worked with teens from Roxbury, Dorchester, and a low-income Latino neighborhood of Jamaica Plain for over twenty years. When I worked at The Food Project, teens from Boston neighborhoods worked side by side with teens from Somerville, Waltham, Lincoln, Wellesley, Lexington, etc. It was painful to observe the consequences from the profound differences in academic rigor, expectations and exposure. Too many of the teens from the Boston schools had difficulty doing the simple math at the farmers’ markets and struggled with any writing assignment, no matter how minimal. It wasn’t about I.Q. It was about a lack of educational opportunity. To make things worse, most of these woefully under performing teens were receiving good grades, so they rejected our offers for tutoring because they were told by their teachers that they were doing well.

The town of Lincoln participates in the METCO program because its residents already understand that a significant number of the Boston public schools are underperforming. If the kids we bring out to Lincoln every day deserve to get a good education, so do the 33,000 others kids on waiting lists for charter schools. Supporting charter schools means they have a chance to have a quality education near where they live.

It is also important to note that the quality of one’s education is a very significant contributor to our increasing economic inequality. Being poorly educated means being under employed or unemployed. That is a tragedy for the individual, a significant financial burden for society, and is potentially disruptive to our civic order. The financial issues regarding charter schools are specious but the financial and societal consequences of having significant percentage of teens/young adults under prepared to participate in our society are enormous and will, one way or another, affect us all.

If we broaden educational options, not just through charter schools, more children will be better served, and more innovation, diverse perspectives, and cross fertilization of ideas will occur. As Colleen said, the schools in the U.S. showed a very clear decline over the past years. We need to dilute the government monopoly on education—take it back and create new models more appropriate for the 21st century, our rapidly changing society and world.

Sincerely,

Pat Gray
Goose Pond Rd.


Previous letters:

  • Letters to the editor on both sides of charter school question
  • School Committee urges ‘no’ vote on Question 2

Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: letters to the editor Leave a Comment

ZBA expected to vote on McLean proposal this week

November 1, 2016

mcleanAfter two public hearing sessions, the Zoning Board of Appeals is expected to vote Thursday on whether McLean Hospital’s proposed Bypass Road facility is a permitted use for the property.

The ZBA heard arguments surrounding the appeal of a group of residents on September 29 and October 20. Both the appellants and MCLean also filed numerous court cases and letters to bolster their positions. Among them were three statements from Lincoln physicians arguing that dialectical behavior therapy (DBT) for boys and young men with borderline personality disorder constitutes a medical use and should therefore not be allowed.

Earlier this fall, a neighborhood coalition hired attorney Michael Fee to appeal the town’s building inspector finding that the proposed 12-bed residential facility is allowed under the Dover amendment, a state statute that exempts religious and educational organizations from certain local zoning bylaws. McLean says the use is primarily educational and not medical.

Definitional differences

The two sides disagreed about the definitions of terms such as “medical,” “educational” and “therapeutic.” For example, gym memberships are often paid for by healthy plans, but psychiatrists and psychologists are allowed to see patients in home offices.

They also disagreed about the exact nature of DBT. “DBT is described on McLean’s own website under the tab ‘clinical services.’ It seems like an educational use implies teachers and students, not therapists and patients,” Smith Hill Road resident Dan Pierce said at the October 20 ZBA hearing.

“BPD is a brain disease with emotional dysregulation as its hallmark and underlying documented brain abnormalities as its basis,” psychiatrist and South Great Road resident Lynn DeLisi wrote in a letter to the ZBA. “It is clear that persons who receive recognized treatments for this disorder do so in order to have their symptoms treated, not to be ‘educated’ on how to function with them.”

But McLean’s Dr. Philip Levendusky had a different view. At the September 29 ZBA hearing, he said DBT teaches “learning-based behavior change techniques integrated with relevant social and carefully managed biological, a.k.a. psychopharmacologic, strategies” and that it teaches mindfulness, emotional regulation, distress tolerance and behavioral flexibility. On October 20, he reiterated that DBT is educational because “we’re trying to teach them ways of reframing what their impulses are and other ways to handle things.”

Levendusky is senior vice president for business development and communications and director of the Psychology Department.

“It’s a great business model [to put a residential facility] in a beautiful town next door that’s too weak to resist its exploitation,” said Brooks Road resident Arthur Anthony. “There’s a lot of profit there. The Dover amendment was not intended to be a cover for big business to exploit neighborhoods and towns.”

Along with an hour of therapy each day, the facility will require 15 hours a week of classroom activities, which are “not a tagalong, not a passing fancy—it’s completely integrated,” Levendusky said, adding, “this is three to five times more educational activity than we have on Cambridge Turnpike.”

Although prescription drugs can be administered and there will be a doctor and nurse at the Bypass Road site, they will not monitor vital signs or perform any other medical procedures,” Levendusky said. Likewise, there will be classrooms and meeting rooms rather than medicalized treatment rooms. “There will be a small medical and recreational component, but I’m hoping you’ll find this is primarily educational,” he said.

The Bypass Road building will be locked “based on [neighbors’] concerns, not based on the profile of the kids,” Levendusky said. Teenagers who are actively abusing substances or who have a police record will not be permitted.

McLean is applying for licensure for the Bypass Road facility from the state Department of Early Education and Care, which also licenses other children’s facilities including day care centers, McLean’s 3East inpatient facility for teenage girls (which is also licensed by the Department of Public Health), the Perkins School for the Blind and the Home for Little Wanderers. Because its residents are adults, McLean’s facility on Concord Turnpike is licensed by the state Department of Mental Health.

The whole issue is murky enough that “you can be intellectually honest and rigorous and come down on either side,” former Planning Board member Bob Domnitz, who was in the audience, told the ZBA. “This project is almost certainly headed to court, so you have to ask yourself, ‘What would residents want us to do?’ The answer is to follow the zoning. I don’t see why a local board would approve this in the absence of a clear mandate or requirement to do this. I’m asking you to keep this trust intact.”

The residents who appealed the building inspector’s decision are Steven and Linda Kanner, Robyn Laukien, Daniel McCarthy, Jay Gregory, Douglas and Lisa Elder, Ted and Nandini David, Beverly and Daniel Peirce, Michael and Lisa Gurrie, Lara and Arthur Anthony, and Mark and Sarah Crosby.

Category: government, land use Leave a Comment

Letter to the editor: some are working to rig the election

October 31, 2016

letter

To the editor:

Yes, the election is rigged—but not how you might have heard.

Hillary Clinton is the only responsible choice to elect as our next president. As NYU research professor Dianne Ravitch wrote yesterday, Clinton is far more qualified for the presidency than Donald Trump, who is completely unfit for the position. She is better educated, more experienced, more thoughtful, wiser and more knowledgeable. She has a demonstrated commitment to the well-being of all Americans.

Conservatives have worked hard to rig this election against Clinton using distortions, ridiculous conspiracy theories, and outright fabrications to which she has been subjected for decades. That strategy has used a continuous vilifying narrative by conservative candidates, surrogates, media and Internet bloggers to incite their base and brainwash themselves and the public. They are now threatening voter suppression and intimidation at the polls.

Most recently, last week’s accusation by Republican FBI director James Comey represented a further example of the continuing litany of unsubstantiated attacks, this time in violation of the Hatch Act.

Another example are the failed Benghazi hearings that dragged on for years at a cost over $7 million for the sole purpose of denigrating Clinton. Compare that with the hearings run by former Massachusetts Speaker of the House Tip O’Neill following the 1983 Beirut terrorist attacks that killed over 258 marines and U.S. personnel during the Reagan administration. Those hearings lasted only two months and produced meaningful bipartisan recommendations to avoid such attacks in the future.

Now Republican Congressmen and senators have said they will hold a Clinton administration hostage by subjecting her to continuous investigations for the duration of her term. Democrats must elect a majority to Congress if they are to achieve a constructive and functional government for a change.

Finally, the New York Times says in its endorsement that the best case for Secretary Clinton is not that she isn’t Donald Trump, it’s that she has the capacity to rise to the challenges this country faces at home and abroad.  Americans deserve a grown up president. A lifetime’s commitment to solving problems in the real world qualifies Clinton for this job.

Sincerely,

20R Gary Davis
Indian Camp Lane


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: government, letters to the editor Leave a Comment

Letter to the editor: make plans to adapt to climate change

October 30, 2016

letter

To the editor:

Four years ago this month, what meteorologists called “Frankenstorm Sandy” took 159 lives and cost the U.S. economy $68 billion. At its outer edges, Sandy was a thousand miles wide. Today, 85 percent of Massachusetts’ 6.7 million residents live within 50 miles of the Bay State’s 1,500 mile coastline. It should not take a superstorm to wake up Massachusetts to the realities of climate change and its weather on steroids—but it may.

Next year, 2,000 business and political leaders will converge on Boston for the world’s seventh major climate summit. This conference is being held in a city that is two-thirds tidal fill and one of the most vulnerable in the world in terms of climate change induced sea level rise.

State lawmakers can showcase our resiliency by passing America’s first climate change preparedness legislation. Moved by the Senate to the House four times and left on the cutting room floor of this year’s energy conference committee, this legislation would prepare Massachusetts for the big impacts of climate change such as stronger storms, intense heat, and accelerated sea level rise.

A coalition of 46 engineering and architectural firms, business and environmental organizations, state and local governments and Boston Mayor Marty Walsh has let Beacon Hill know we need climate change legislation and we need it now. They know that Massachusetts is vulnerable and we need a plan—a plan that shows us how to lessen storm impacts to our built and natural environments and then demonstrates how to use both to protect us.

Specifically, we need a plan that assesses the vulnerability of the Commonwealth’s electrical grid, buildings, roads, airports, dams, water supplies and sewage plants and then recommends how to strengthen them. We need a plan that recognizes the protective value of our beaches, wetlands, forests and rivers, and then explains how to use their natural features to buffer people from the impacts of stronger storms. Most importantly, we need a plan that identifies our most vulnerable human populations, especially the poor, isolated and elderly, and determines how best to insulate them from the ravages of superstorms.

Although the governor recently took a first step by issuing an executive order to his agencies to prepare for climate change, his directive has no authority beyond his administration and its four-year term. What the Commonwealth needs is a long-term plan required by legislative statute that matches the long-term impacts of climate change.

Industries that understand what needs to be done are insurance and real estate. They know we need to mitigate the impacts of climate change to avoid skyrocketing costs and risks. They’re using NOAA models that forecast a six-foot rise in oceans by 2100.  To this writer, that’s a long way off, but my two-year old grandson will be 86 in 2100—well within a healthy male’s life expectancy.

The Insurance Journal recently reported on a project “to create climate change indices that reflect an actuarial perspective, to create an index that measures changes in climate extremes, use indices to inform the insurance industry and the public, and promote the actuarial profession by contributing statistically to the climate change debate…”

In August, Zillow reported that NOAA’s projected sea level rise would sink 62,069 Massachusetts homes representing 3.1 percent of the state’s housing stock equaling $51.2 billion—almost half of that is in Greater Boston.

Since Sandy, our conversations about climate change have changed. The current challenge is not so much about saving the planet from heat-trapping gases as it is about saving us from a warming planet. Adaptation to climate change is not throwing in the towel but rather facing the realities of living with, coping with, and adapting to its effects.

With so much carbon pollution already in the air and our traditional fossil fuel energy production and use patterns locked in, we have no choice but to live with and plan for its consequences.

Last year was the hottest ever and NOAA forecasts this year will be hotter. Be it higher seas and coastal erosion, more frequent and severe droughts and flooding, or just plain weird weather, it’s time for Massachusetts to plan for what was previously the unexpected and manage what is now the unavoidable.

Sincerely,

Jack Clark
Director of Public Policy and Government Relations for Mass Audubon; co-chair of the Massachusetts Climate Change Adaptation Coalition


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published.

Category: conservation, letters to the editor Leave a Comment

News acorns

October 30, 2016

Home energy workshop next week

energy-challenge

Jennifer Haugh, Sue Klem and Lynne Smith will be among those who will answer questions at the Residential Energy Workshop.

Lincoln’s Green Energy Committee will sponsor a Residential Energy Workshop on Wednesday, Nov. 2 at 7 p.m. at Pierce House. Experts will answer questions on a broad range of home energy topics, including energy efficiency, solar, and buying electricity using renewable energy. Anyone with questions may contact Sue Klem at Susan.M.Klem@gmail.com.

Newcomers’ event on Nov. 6

People who have moved into Lincoln within the past two years are invited to a Welcome Newcomers event on Sunday, Nov. 6 from 3-5 p.m. at Pierce House. This informal event is a great way for new residents to meet neighbors, new and old, and to learn more about what is fondly referred to as “the Lincoln way.” Representatives from the town’s elected and volunteer boards, committees and membership organizations will be on hand to meet newcomers and answer any questions about getting involved in the life of Lincoln. Light refreshments will be served. Advance registration is requested; please email Virginia Rundell at vq@verizon.net.

Paws for the Holidays Festival

Paws for the Holidays Festival is anew holiday tradition hosted by Phinney’s Friends on Saturday, Nov. 12 from 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. at the Pierce House. There will be caroling, Santa pictures for the family, live music, a caricaturist, baked goods, and a silent auction as well as items for sale such as dog costumes, toys, pet treats and cupcakes. Admission is free; kids and leashed dogs are welcome. Phinney’s Friends is a Lincoln nonprofit that works to help pet owners care for their animals in the event of illness or disability.

Category: charity/volunteer, conservation Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 301
  • Page 302
  • Page 303
  • Page 304
  • Page 305
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 437
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • Police log for April 26 – May 8, 2025 May 11, 2025
  • Beverly Eckhardt, 1928–2025 May 11, 2025
  • My Turn: Planning for climate-friendly aviation May 8, 2025
  • News acorns May 7, 2025
  • Legal notice: Select Board public hearing May 7, 2025

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2025 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.