• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscription Info
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Previous Issues
    • Submit Your Work
    • Subscribe/Donate

Letter to the editor: Mattes clarifies remarks on Hanscom

March 27, 2014

letter

To the editor:

In the March 23 Lincoln Squirrel report on the Lincoln candidates’ forum held on March 15 (see video of entire forum here), a quote was attributed to me. Unfortunately, the quote was limited to a statement that implied the opposite of the thrust of the question I was asking.

The quote in the Squirrel was accurate as far as it went: “Mattes, who was a key local official in the 2005 BRAC (base realignment and closure) process, said that as a result of negotiations at that time, Lincoln would be essentially indemnified from any changes that would have impact on us regarding housing.”

That mitigation—an agreement to offset the cost of 730+ new households in Lincoln—was relevant only for the potential outcomes of 2005 and no longer applies.

I went on to express concern that in the recent climate, where there would be no BRAC, there is the potential to physically separate the housing on the base from the office buildings and business operations. The base, as an economic engine for the region, would be saved while the housing and schools could be off-loaded from military responsibility and become the responsibility of Lincoln. Every Democratic gubernatorial candidate, including the attorney general and the state treasurer, affirmed this concern at a recent Lincoln forum. All urged Lincoln to prepare for this potential

After stating the above, I asked, “Have we negotiated and received any such mitigation now, before offering unqualified support?”

The danger of not receiving pledges for mitigation before lending support is that we may have given away all leverage and we may not be insulated from the financial impacts of adding 730+ households to our town.

Sincerely,

Sara Mattes


Letters to the editor must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Letters must be about a Lincoln-specific topic. Letters containing personal attacks, errors of fact or other inappropriate material will not be published. Letters may be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor.

Category: government, letters to the editor Leave a Comment

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Upcoming Events

May 20 Wed
7:00 pm - 8:00 pm

Lincoln Old Town Hall Corp. annual meeting

May 20 Wed
7:00 pm - 8:30 pm

Talk on AI

May 22 Fri
12:30 pm - 1:30 pm

Hip Hop Square Dance for Seniors

May 22 Fri
7:00 pm - 9:00 pm

“Baroque to Broadway”

May 27 Wed
1:00 pm - 3:30 pm

Pride Celebration

View Calendar

Recent Posts

  • Legal notice: Planning Board hearing (Civico) May 19, 2026
  • Fate of trees to be announced on June 8 May 18, 2026
  • Police log for May 5–13, 2026 May 17, 2026
  • Board accepts $1.35 million in donations for community center May 14, 2026
  • News acorns May 13, 2026

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Advanced search

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2026 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.