The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

My Turn

My Turn: Postlethwait says thanks, lauds rezoning adjustments made before Town Meeting

By Sarah Postlethwait

I would like to take this opportunity to congratulate Gary Taylor on his victory. It was a huge turnout and you have a strong following! Thank you for the years of service you have given this town already and will continue to offer in the future.

I would also like to thank the nearly 700 of my neighbors, friends, and complete strangers who went out on a limb to vote for me. I am incredibly grateful for your support!

I know many of those people voted for me because they were also frustrated with the lack of community collaboration and transparency experienced in the past few months. I hope that Mr. Taylor will consider the voice of the 42% of residents who cast a vote in my favor and push for changes in the process going forward. Doing so will ensure 100% of the town wins.

I was moved by a group of seventh-graders who came over to speak to our crowd of sign holders Monday. Those children were very concerned about the Lincoln that may be awaiting them when they are adults, and they felt their voices were also unheard. I informed them of their ability to bring a citizen’s petition to town meeting on any topic that they felt passionate about, and had an idea of how to improve. They were intrigued and invigorated to learn that their voices could actually count. They could have a say in their future, too. I hope they feel compelled to actively participate in our town government, and I hope that is a theme we can see continuing in the adult population, as well. An active engaged community makes a better end product.

  • I am incredibly grateful for the work that hundreds of my fellow residents who are associated with the LRHA accomplished in the past seven months to help protect our town. Due to their keen observations and unwavering persistence, the HCA rezoning that passed on Saturday was a vastly different article than what it was intended to be in September. They have also greatly contributed to democracy in our town at the same time.
  • The total number of housing units that could be built was reduced from over 1,400 to 800. A 67% total housing increase within a half-mile radius would have been detrimental to our town.
  • The state changed its model used by all towns to take into account wetlands, and allow for less density around them — helping preserve Lincoln’s environment, but also the environment of countless other towns in our state.
  • They brought attention to the bylaw that allowed a developer to count any “street-activated use” as commercial — including lobbies, residential gyms, common spaces, and leasing offices — which could have been detrimental to retail business at the mall if left in the wrong hands.
  • They brought attention to the lack of affordable housing being required, and as a result, the Planning Department promised to resubmit a new feasibility study that can support 15% affordable housing. This will help save our limited affordable housing trust funds, so it can be used to create a more diverse affordable housing stock.
  • They helped shed light on the negative impact on our beloved businesses if a hundred housing units would have been allowed to be built on the mall, resulting in the amendment presented by the RLF at town meeting.
  • They brought attention to the lack of environmental protections in both the HCA and general zoning bylaws, which will hopefully result in protections for open undeveloped space and mature trees in the near future.
  • Their push for clickers at Town Meeting resulted in this article being brought to Town Meeting and approved. As a result, much smoother and shorter Town Meetings will hopefully be in our future, allowing even more residents the ability and desire to participate.
  • They made residents aware of buses that helped many citizens have access to town meeting. Hopefully the town will continue the bus service in the future due to the limited parking available at the school for town meeting.
  • They advocated for people with disabilities to be able to participate in town meetings remotely, resulting in a town policy change that will continue into the future.
  • They advocated for the Town Meeting process to be reevaluated, including having a written set of Town Meeting rules, a policy for relevant town boards to be permitted to speak from the podium, and a request for more balanced presentations that include any dissenting voices of the presenting board to have equal podium time. As a result, the Select Board has promised to establish a committee that will address these concerns and look into making Town Meeting more fair and balanced, giving residents real choices rather than asking for a rubber stamp of approval.

While our work is not done, I can’t but help feel grateful for all that we have accomplished, and I hope that all of our fellow residents feel the same. I especially hope that all residents, no matter their view or age, will feel motivated to continue being active and engaged citizens, positively contributing to our beautiful town.

Thank you again for your support, Lincoln.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Thank-you from Jennifer Glass

By Jennifer Glass

Thank you. 

No matter how you voted at Town Meeting or in the election, thank you for the ideas, time, and energy that you dedicate to our town.  We have just made some big decisions together, the conversations have been passionate, and I know that we have each spoken from a desire to make Lincoln a stronger community. We will continue to have discussions about how we want to express our vision for the town, and I trust that we will continue to find ways to collaborate, compromise, and balance multiple viewpoints.

I really appreciate that Frank stepped up to run.  In the course of the past few weeks, he and I have spent a lot of time talking to people, and those conversations have not only been thoughtful and informative — they have also helped to forge connections and build community. 

I am very thankful for the opportunity to continue to serve on the Select Board, I encourage you to stay or become involved in the many and varied town boards and committees, and I look forward to the work we will do together.

In gratitude,

Jennifer

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: DeLisi’s version of HCA amendment events

By Lynn DeLisi

Editor’s note: DeLisi, a member of the Planning Board, originally posted the following as a comment on the March 25 Lincoln Squirrel story headlined “HCAWG, RLF were surprised by rumored amendment to zoning motion” and is being reprinted here with her permission.)

None of what is being reported here was shared with both Eph Flint and myself. In fact, let me set this straight: after Eph and I made it very clear that the Planning Board needed more time to address the many outstanding issues residents have raised, [board chair] Margaret Olson contacted me and suggested we do an amendment and told me that [Director of Planning and Land Use] Paula [Vaughn-Mackenzie] would help me. She further added that we could discuss it as a board and maybe then present a unified board to the town meeting instead of Eph and I supporting a “no” vote.

The next day, I contacted Paula; she convinced me not to go below 15 units per acre in the mall and had Utile approve the numbers I had. She asked me to get Eph’s approval, which I did. Margaret then called a special Planning Board Meeting for last Saturday, March 16, but since I was to be out of town then, it was postponed to be discussed at the Tuesday, March 19 Planning Board meeting. However, Eph and I never understood why it was taken off of the agenda and we were not aware that Paula had mentioned it at a [Housing Choice Act Working Group] meeting.

We both talked to many other town residents in the few days before Town Meeting and decided that an amendment was not the way to go — even though it was a step in the right direction and relieved some of the density we feared at the mall. The reason is that there were many other issues not yet discussed and still not, and there has been no consensus yet in town about how to do this right. Nor, most importantly, have the current residents of the Lincoln Station area been consulted about their views for the rezoning in some cases of their own properties. We wanted more time to reach a true compromise in a democratic way. We wanted representatives of different viewpoints to sit at the same table with the Planning Board to discuss what is most important and how to zone for it.

The reporting of the Working Group meeting by Alice Waugh is a good illustration of why that working group needs to be disbanded. Their discussion was never reported to us as Planning Board members and should have been.

I am extremely dismayed by the events of the last few weeks in our beloved town and hope our leadership can find a way to obtain a consensus among all of us for the sake of future generations of residents of Lincoln. I am also outraged that Eph and I were treated as “black sheep” and not allowed to present our wishes for the town at the podium.

I have been a member of the Planning Board for a decade and have never seen such an awful set of circumstances such as these develop — ultimately leading to a very weak and divided vote. I call now for a real vote at the polls.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: On the fairness or unfairness of the procedures at Town Meeting

By Edward Young

Although the moderator said that none of the controversial procedures followed at [Saturday’s] Town Meeting should be considered as precedents, they raise questions that should be addressed when the town considers Town Meeting procedures comprehensively later this year, if not sooner. Here is how the moderator regulated who spoke, when and where.

Prior to the meeting, the moderator had announced that a group of over 300 residents — who had petitioned for time for a spokesperson to speak from the podium, with slides, in opposition to voting now on the announced resolution regarding a draft HCA bylaw nine months before the deadline for HCA compliance — would instead speak for ten minutes from microphones in the auditorium, without slides, and that a spokesperson for another group of residents who favored voting on the resolution now would be allowed to speak in the same manner. Presumably, only town officials and members of town advisory committees, all of whom favored immediate adoption of the resolution, would be allowed to speak from the podium or present slides.

Two members of the Planning Board who had voted against the draft bylaw in its current form also asked to be able to speak from the podium, as their three fellow Planning Board members who had voted in favor were allowed to do without time limit. This was denied, and they were restricted to getting in line for two minutes each at the microphone. Instead of allowing the two members to say themselves whatever they wanted to say from the podium, in their own tone of voice and in the fresh context of whatever was being said at the meeting, another Planning Board member chose to read aloud, in their own tone of voice, a public statement that the two members had made some weeks before.

Neither group of residents, nor the two Planning Board members, has any financial stake in the outcome of the HCA vote.

However, before either group was allowed to speak, the Rural Land Foundation — which is not a part of town government, and which has a financial stake of millions of dollars in the outcome of the HCA vote — was allowed to speak from the podium, with slides. This came as a complete surprise to the voters in the auditorium.

By being recognized first, the RLF was enabled to move a detailed amendment to the HCA resolution that precluded discussion of the main motion for quite some time. The RLF flashed on the screen a series of highly complicated charts that were not handed out before the meeting and which voters had not had a chance to review.

After the amendment had been discussed and voted on, the two groups of residents were finally allowed to speak on the (amended) main motion. The opponents of the motion were called on first and the proponents had the chance to rebut what they said. It would be interesting to know if that order of speaking was decided by coin flip or other neutral method.

The two Planning Board members were patient enough to eventually make it through the microphone line for two minute comments.

That’s how discussion was handled at Town Meeting.

So I submit that a robust examination of the fairness or unfairness of what just happened at Town Meeting is very much in order. I wonder if anyone would care to provide reasons in justification for it?

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Vote no on the “bluntest instrument” for HCA compliance

By Randy Harrison

I am planning to vote no (for now) on Option C. Here’s why.

The Housing Choice Act (HCA) has given us a unique generational challenge and opportunity. At this point in the process, I’m hearing lots of winner-take-all, us-versus-them sentiments coming from all sides: “If you vote yes, you don’t care about Lincoln’s love of the environment and history of stewardship of the land” and “If you vote no, you are anti-development, anti-transit, and anti-diversity,” etc. Having lived in town for 30 years, raised our son, and gotten to know so many wonderful folks here, I’m hard-pressed to believe that either assumption is correct.

I originally thought that Option C might be the best solution, but with the information now at hand, the clarity I have personally sought has been elusive. Option C now appears to me to be the bluntest instrument to meet our HCA obligation. Even the Planning Board is split on this issue, which indicates that we still have work to do.

No matter what the outcome, don’t we and the generations that follow deserve to know that we have done everything we can to find a solution that embraces and unites the best of our community? This is where my “No (for now)” vote comes from and why I will be voting for Sarah Postlethwait for Planning Board.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: COA&HS board urges passage of community center measure

By Sally Kindleberger

We on the Board of Directors for the Council on Aging and Human Services ask you to vote for the Lincoln community center. The staff and volunteers at the COA&HS provide so many services across age groups, including exercise classes, lectures, help with taxes, housing, and debt relief. needed transportation, therapeutic groups as well as individual therapy, and much much more.

Beautiful Bemis Hall no longer meets the needs of the COA&HS community. Built in 1880 it is not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Many of the spaces are cramped, windowless, and don’t offer needed privacy. There is no air conditioning on the second floor, which makes the room unbearable during summer months. And the pods on the school campus have long outlived their useful life.

Given thoughtful and careful scheduling, a new community center will provide dedicated spaces for LEAP, Parks and Recreation, and the COA&HS as well as shared spaces to be used by many other groups. The building will welcome families and help to forge intergenerational connections.

Please join us in supporting this necessary and exciting venture. A new community center will serve folk for generations to come and will be an amazing asset to our town. And please make a pledge that will reduce the cost of the building if you haven’t already done so.

Sally Kindleberger on behalf of the Council on Aging Board:

Dilla Tingley, chair
Laura Crosby, vice chair
Sally Kindleberger
Wendy Kusik, LICSW
Don Milan, JD
Terry Perlmutter
Jane O’Rourke, LICSW
Kathy Ramon
Donna Rizzo
Mark Sandman
Peter Von Mertens
Hope White

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Vote for Jennifer Glass for a third term on Select Board

Dear Lincoln neighbors,

We are writing to ask for your vote to reelect Jennifer Glass to the Select Board. We believe that Jennifer is one of the most effective Selects in the history of our town. She has significant experience on several Boards and Committees, serving as Chair of both the School Committee and the Select Board.

Jennifer will continue to bring to the Select Board:

  • Extensive experience as a town leader with a record of effective action
  • Broad knowledge of Lincoln, our values, our needs, and how to move forward
  • Keen intelligence, ability to research, analyze, and solve complex issues
  • Awareness of the value of contributions of residents and town staff
  • Understanding of the regional issues that affect Lincoln through her participation with the Metropolitan Area Planning Council and the Massachusetts Municipal Association
  • Proven ability to solve problems and find solutions.

Jennifer has constantly shown her dedication, thoroughness, and professionalism in her work as a town official. Beginning with a study on classroom size in 2007, moving on to the School Committee, and then to the Select Board, she has been an outstanding leader. As a member and then chair of the School Committee, she assisted in securing state aid to fund 40% of the 2012 school project. When the town voted not to go forward with that project, Jennifer worked assiduously for five years to bring the town together to agree on a new project. Then, as the the Select Board’s member of the School Committee Building Committee, Jennifer worked tirelessly to keep the project on time and on budget, and led the Property Tax Study Committee to explore new options to mitigate property taxes.

While she was serving as a Select, she also served on the Water Commission; helped found the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Antiracism Committee (IDEA), and led the Housing Choice Act Working Group. To facilitate further communication with residents, she instituted a regular “Ask a Select Board member” drop-in sessions held around town. She is editor in chief of the Select Board newsletter. Through her 17 years of leadership and commitment on these boards and committees, she has developed an extraordinary understanding of the town and a proven ability to get things done.

A vote for Jennifer is a vote for:

  • Effective leadership
  • Wisdom and experience in action
  • Commitment to Lincoln’s wellbeing

We support Jennifer Glass for Select. Please join us — vote for Jennifer.

Abigail Adams
Sarah Andrysiak
Chris Andrysiak
Dea Angiolillo
Jacqueline Apsler
Robert Apsler
Lisa Baer
William Barclay
Ken Bassett
Alex Benik
Laura Berland
Becky Bermont
Sarah Bishop
Cathy Bitter
Hans Bitter
Paul Blanchfield
Rebecca Blanchfield
Pam Boardman
John Bordiuk
Rory Bordiuk
Janet Boynton
Stephen Brand
Julie Brogan
Gus Browne
Kim Buell
Larry Buell
Sarah Cairns-Smith
Annie Calhoun
Karen Carlson
Tom Casey
Ted Chan
Alex Chatfield
Lindsay Clemens
Buzz Constable
Elizabeth Creighton
Sandy Creighton
Tom Christenfeld
Doug Crosby
Laura Crosby
Priscilla Damon
Rosamond DeLori
Moha Desai
Penny DeNormandie
Tom DeNormandie
Jona Donaldson
Brianna Doo
Rachel Drew
Jeff Eaton
Andy Falender
Becca Fasciano
Jon Ferris
Kristen Ferris
Lorraine Fiore
Nancy Fleming
Jim Fleming
Amy Funkenstein
Asli Grace
Matt Grace
Rob Graves
Jennie Morris Grundy
Gina Halsted
Emily Haslett
Tom Haslett
Alan Hein
Jim Henderson
Nancy Henderson
Ruth Ann Hendrickson
Lis Herbert
Zach Herbert
Shira Horwitz
Ken Hurd
Pam Hurd
Brian Jalet
Kimberly Jalet
Steve Johnson
Jon Kelman
Joan Kimball
John Kimball
Chris Klem
Sue Klem
Steve Kropper
Stephen Kutenplon
Judith Lawler
Patrick Lawler
Barbara Leggat
Jackie Lenth
Dave Levington
Mollye Lockwood
Todd Lockwood
Mary Helen Lorenz
Sara Lupkas
Scott Lupkas
Rachel Mason
Lucy Maulsby
Chris McCarthy
John Mendelson
Kenny Mitchell
Tara Mitchell
Richard Mollica
Staci Montori
Buffer Morgan
Terri Morgan
Rachel Neurath
Craig Nicholson
Katie Nicholson
John Nolan
Trisha O’Hagan
Jane O’Rourke
David Onigman
Katherine Hall Page
Candace Pearson
Terry Perlmutter
Christopher Plonski
Dana Robbat
Joe Robbat
Stuart Rose
Travis Roland
Allen Rossiter
Selina Rossiter
Joanna Schmergel
Lucy Sachs
Jena Salon
Kathleen Shepard
Ray Shepard
Andrew Singer
Ellen Meyer Shorb
Paul Shorb
Barbara Slayter
Vicky Slingerland
Stephanie Smart
Tucker Smith
Jonathan Soo
Kara Soo
Nancy Soulette
Mary Stechshulte
Bill Stason
Susan Stason
Scott Steward
MingVi Steward
Susan Hand Taylor
Dilla Tingley
Margie Toph
Allen Vander Meulen
Peter Von Mertens
Katy Walker
Tom Walker
Heidi Webb
Ben Wells
Jean Welsh
Bryce Wolf
Bob Wolf
Krystal Wood
Louis Zipes
Tanya Zipes
 

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Vote “yes” on HCA zoning and “no” on community center

By Ken Hurd

With apologies to all those who have worked to bring a new community center to Lincoln, I once again feel compelled to voice my strongly held opinion as an architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, and I want to remind everyone why I and so many others believe we should not build a community center on the school campus. I still believe the Council on Aging component should be located in Lincoln Station and let the LEAP and the Recreation Department be located at the school.  

First and foremost, I believe that a $25 million investment by the town should be deployed where it would have the greatest positive impact — namely in the Lincoln Station area. For nearly 14 years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long-Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the time. Unless Lincoln is proactive in embracing change, the area will continue to decline.

Equally important, I believe that many of the decisions and commitments that led to the current community center proposal were well-intended but somewhat myopic, and to make matters worse, they now predate the new realities of post-pandemic life in the 21st century. Chief among these is our increased awareness of the effects of climate change as warmer winters, hotter summers, and earlier springs dominate our lived experience, suggesting that anything we can do to minimize our dependence on the automobile should be a very high priority.

I also never bought into the idea that mixing octogenarian driving skills with children on a playing field was anything but an accident waiting to happen. And in the new age of the AR-15, I would remind everyone that school shooting incidents in the U.S. have skyrocketed since 2015. In 2023 alone, there were 198 shooting incidents at K-12 schools, six of which involved active shooters. Of course, everyone believes it won’t happen here, just as everyone believed it wouldn’t happen when and where the shootings did occur. Why we would even consider locating an adult facility on a school campus in such an era of random and unpredictable violence is beyond me.

From a planning standpoint, the economic disruption caused by the pandemic combined with the dramatic increase in wealth inequality over the last decade has put increased pressure on the need for more housing in the region. For economic reasons, many seniors who might want to downsize are somewhat locked into staying in their larger homes until there are reasonable housing alternatives from which to choose. Thanks to the HCA, we are bound to see at least some increase in housing in the Lincoln Station area, and most professional planners I know would consider this a golden opportunity to locate the COA in the middle of such a potential concentration of housing. Doing so would not only create a symbiotic relationship among the multiple uses desired, but also between the primary users and the facility should the right mix and size of units be offered.  

Lastly, we learned at the recent informational session on March 7 that the current proposed zoning regulations for the HCA overlay district contain no language that would prohibit such a use. We also learned that the RLF has never been asked by the town if they would be amenable to incorporating the needed COA spaces into any development they do.

Frankly, if the COA component of the community center were incorporated in the RLF’s plan for redevelopment, it would represent a plus to any potential developer’s pro forma — namely, to have a confirmed tenant for an active community use in a purposely designed ground-level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to Lincoln in upfront financing for design and construction, and it would replace public project inefficiencies with professional development expertise. Doing so may make the new community center facility far more affordable to the town’s already stressed taxpayers. 

So, my hope is that voters will vote YES for Article 3 and vote NO on Article 4.That way, I believe it opens a door for the RLF and the town to work together on an overall masterplan that addresses many of these larger issues in a much more holistic fashion, ultimately helping to transform Lincoln Station to its full potential as a truly vital, walkable village center. Remember, we humans shape our environments at a moment in time, and then they shape us for decades to come.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: An explanation of the ballot vote on community center

By Lynne Smith

At Town Meeting on March 23, the Community Center Building Committee will present slides illustrating a new building proposed to house the Council on Aging & Human Services, the Parks and Recreation Department, and the LEAP after-school program. While the renderings of any new building are always exciting to preview, I caution you not to get too excited. 

At $24 million, the building is expensive. I recently received my paper ballot and looked at the March 25 election question we will vote on if the community center vote passes at Town Meeting. Here is what it says:

Question 1:

Shall the Town of Lincoln be allowed to exempt from the provisions of Proposition Two-and-One-half, so-called, the amounts required to pay for the bonds issued for the purpose of paying the costs of designing, renovating, rebuilding, constructing, equipping, and furnishing a new Community Center to be located in the Hartwell Complex of the Ballfield Road school campus, Lincoln MA, including payment of costs incidental or related thereto?

Yes___      No____

The language baffled me: it did not mention the $24 million cost and it seemed to suggest a tax increase was somehow “exempt”! 

As I read the warrant prepared for Town Meeting by the Finance Committee and discussed it with my husband, we came up with this explanation:

  • Proposition 2½ limits the amount our tax levy can increase each year (2.5%) without requiring an override with a supermajority of voters.
  • But the law provides for so-called “exclusions” for capital or debt to allow residents to vote for one-time projects that are outside (above and beyond) of the Prop 2½ levy limit. 
  • Those exclusions require a supermajority vote at Town Meeting (March 23), as well as a simple majority at the ballot box (March 25).

So residents voting yes on this ballot measure are permitting a one-time exemption (exclusion) from the 2.5% annual levy limit increase imposed by Prop 2½. The fact is, this one-time exclusion will result in taxes over the next 30 or so years during which the bond is repaid. The $94 million school was also a one-time exclusion. We aren’t calling it an override even though it will increase our taxes and draw down our stabilization fund. Instead, it is an exclusion.

But wait, there’s more!

To minimize a residential tax increase for the community center, the Finance Committee recommends using $2 million of tree cash that would otherwise go to our stabilization fund plus $4.75 million from the current stabilization fund balance (see the bottom of page 2 of the warrant book.)

In total, $6.75 million from saved taxes will be used to fund the community center. The stabilization fund is used for unplanned but necessary expenses and the so-called free cash comes from the 2.5% tax increase that Lincoln residents pay every year, whether or not the budget requires it. We are paying it forward! Despite raiding both the free cash and stabilization funds, the cost of the debt for a new community center building will increase our taxes substantially.

While I appreciate the efforts of the Finance Committee to fund all the projects we ask for, I am definitely voting no at Town Meeting and on the paper ballot on March 25. I would rather use our stabilization fund to adapt existing buildings for new uses, not demolish serviceable ones.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: “No for now” will lead to “yes together”

By Lynne Smith

Many people in town are aware of the emotions around the Housing Choice Act proposed zoning amendment. These emotions are a testament to the fierce love we have for Lincoln. We cherish its past, appreciate its current beauty, and imagine a rejuvenating future that builds on our values. People on both sides of the issue share these feelings but disagree over the path.

We all want to:

  1. Comply with the HCA
  2. Add new multifamily units at lower prices than existing housing
  3. Protect retail business and parking at the mall
  4. Minimize environmental impact and preserve green space
  5. Continue Lincoln’s practice of 15%+ affordable housing
  6. Recognize Lincoln’s past success in developing 800 multifamily units (40% of our existing housing)

I believe we all want to be thoughtful and thorough about this momentous decision.

One of the main issues that deserves further discussion is this: A yes vote at Town Meeting would permit 100 units of housing* to be built at the Lincoln Mall. The Rural Land Foundation, owner of the mall, has shown a preliminary plan with 40 units, but has stated that allowing only 40 units is “not economically viable.” Where would the additional 60 units be built? Unfortunately, due to the finite space available at the mall, the likely outcome would be the replacement of retail space with housing units — the demise of Lincoln’s retail center.

We are fortunate to have Lincoln resident Ben Shiller, an economics professor, engaged with this issue. He has created a video that explains the problems with large-scale development of the mall and you can watch it here.

Ben Shiller is part of a data-driven grassroots organization that has been analyzing the HCA rezoning since last September. This group has coalesced as the Lincoln Residents for Housing Alternatives, LRHA, which corrected flaws in the initial zoning proposed by the Planning Board. LRHA has put together an informative website that describes and illustrates HCA issues. You can review it here before making a final decision.

I’m voting no for now to get to yes together! We should pause before taking the irreversible step of voting yes on Article 3 at Town Meeting on March 23. It will pass if only a simple majority of voters who attend the Town Meeting in person vote in favor. This could leave much of the town deeply dissatisfied with the result as well as with the process for the development of the proposed zoning, which was rushed through ahead of the legally permitted timeline without adequate time for public input to be received and incorporated.

Lincoln has until December 2024 to submit the HCA proposal. With a nine-month runway, a collaborative working group could craft a proposal that would pass with a substantial majority. An ideal plan would allow representatives from the LRHA and from a working group appointed by the Select Board to sit down together, analyze the data, iron out differences, and create a better choice with more public input. Much work has already been done and residents are more informed. A direct dialog with reasonable people on both sides could quickly lead to a consensus. I believe this group could arrive at a first draft by the end of May, revise and share it with residents over the summer months, and then present it in September, well before the state mandated deadline of December 31, 2024.

Members of the Planning Board and the Select Board have said we have time to get this right:

Jim Hutchinson, Select Board (March 7, 2024)

“If you like Option C, you should be comfortable voting for it, but if you don’t like it and want us to go in a different direction, we’ll get everyone back to the table and come up with a compromise to consider before year end.” 

Ephraim Flint and Lynn DeLisi, Planning Board (March 6, 2024):

“…we need more time to bring people together to discuss a compromise solution that most residents of town can agree on. This too could be done by forming a new subcommittee of the Planning Board to help obtain consensus between opposing views.”

Please join me in making sure that we take the necessary time to unite our town and to get the HCA Right. Vote “no for now.”

*Current proposal zones the mall’s four acres at 25 units per acre.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.