• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscriptions
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Issues
    • Submit your work

elections

Planning Board candidates have their say

March 5, 2020

The Lincoln Squirrel is gathering statements from the candidates in the town election that takes place March 30. First up: the three candidates who are running for two seats on the Planning Board, which is the only contested race this year: incumbent Lynn DeLisi, challenger and former board member Robert Domnitz, and incumbent Rick Rundell.


Lynn DeLisi

South Great Road

Lynn DeLisi

I am running for re-election to the Planning Board of our town and I would like to tell you why.

Like so many other people, we decided to purchase a home in Lincoln several years ago because we fell in love with the picturesque vistas of wide-open spaces with nighttime stars in the sky, fields of wildflowers, organic farms and wild-life of all kinds safely roaming conservation land. The zoning for one residential home per two acres appealed to us, along with the many mapped walking paths and scenic ponds. We were amazed that we could carry our canoe to the Sudbury River and see blue herons, and yet attend a concert at the BSO only a 30-minute drive from our house.

Not even a month after we moved into our new home, however, we received a letter by registered mail from a neighbor whose property we abutted on three sides. He included a diagram of a dozen dense structures on the acreage surrounding our lot with a letter informing us that a developer in Concord was interested in buying his land and placing several groups of condos in an L shape surrounding our new home. The letter further stated that “The Planning Board was very interested in having this done.” I cried a lot after receiving that letter and the stress of this crisis was tremendous. We had just purchased a house we loved with a beautiful view in a town we thought was unique for the reasons I mentioned, and now we were about to be surrounded by dense dwellings and more people, cars, and noise than we thought could be possible in this quiet, environmentally sensitive community.

Not long after receiving this letter, I saw there was a vacancy on the Planning Board, expressed my interest, and was appointed. Once on the board, I became aware that what my neighbor wanted would need to go through zoning changes and site plan reviews and be approved by Town Meeting. It still could have happened, but this neighbor’s plan never came to fruition simply because we managed to purchase that extra lot surrounding us to preserve our view, our favorite wildlife, and quiet.

I realize, however, that not everyone in town can stop the development around them as we did. If someone convinces the Planning Board and the town of the need to rezone a neighborhood for new housing or something else, what almost happened to us could be reality for others. They need someone on the Planning Board who will listen to them and look out for their interests.

Currently there is a controversy about whether or not significantly more dense housing units are needed in South Lincoln near the train station. Some people think we need to do our share as a town to alleviate the housing problem in Boston. Others do not agree and predict the changes to the town would be dramatic. Those most affected are those living there already and are the most vulnerable to the changes.

It’s difficult to know what the majority of people truly want for this district. I don’t think that gets answered by early-morning or late-weekday-evening public forums and meetings. Can all those who care attend these meetings and speak up to voice an opinion? Are these opinions being counted in some way? Do we need a scientifically and carefully constructed survey of the town to determine what the residents want? This may be the best way to hear all the views.

I know very well what the negative consequences of not carefully listening could be. I will always be questioning why, where, and what, and looking for ways to preserve neighborhoods and the interests of abutters while maintaining the uniqueness of Lincoln.

One of my past accomplishments on the Planning Board was my service on the Selectman’s fact-finding committee on the implications of the legalization of recreational marijuana businesses in the Lincoln. As a committee, we were very cognizant that we needed to put our personal views aside and recommend to the Selectmen a path to follow that the people of the town truly wanted.

In order to do that, I took the lead in conducting a survey of residents to hear their views on having marijuana grown, manufactured, and/or sold within our town. Based on that survey, a public forum, and extensive research on the facts, we brought to a Special Town Meeting a bylaw amendment to ban marijuana establishments in Lincoln, and this was passed by two-thirds vote and by subsequent ballot. I am proud to have contributed to this, knowing as I do (someone working with young adults addicted to marijuana) that we have taken a small step not to promote easy access to a harmful substance by the youth of our town. If, in the future, carefully controlled treatment trials show positive effects of cannabis products on an array of medical ailments, I will be happy to help reverse this town vote.

Another campaign of mine has been to help the residents of North Lincoln, who in my mind have suffered more than their share for the town. The Route 2 changes occurred before my time on the Planning Board and I have been dismayed with how they were handled and how residents of our town have suffered. I tried hard to minimize the effects of Minuteman Vocational High School on the residents of Mill Street. I believe it is a disgrace how the school officials handled this project, not collaborating with the neighborhood. They did not need the high tower for theater classes, or to clear out so many trees, or to build a highly lit stadium with a loud speaker system.

In addition, as a Harvard-affiliated psychiatrist who treats people with borderline personality disorder frequently, I knew that what McLean was doing to claim they were an educational facility was wrong. I spoke out against it orally and in writing. Unfortunately, this ultimately did not go in favor of the North Lincoln residents. Nevertheless, I will continue to speak out forcefully against anything that has a negative impact on the neighborhoods of North Lincoln and will of course rigorously support the positive.

In summary, I am for responsible planning, always in collaboration with the people in neighborhoods. I am for keeping the South Lincoln commercial district successful but not dense with new housing unless that is truly what the majority of residents want. I am for keeping North Lincoln residents free from any more adversity, which means keeping a DPW site out of North Lincoln.

I am for regulations that preserve Lincoln’s unique atmosphere, with nighttime stars and early morning wildlife grazing in open fields. I am for preserving the historical significance of some of Lincoln’s neighborhoods and the designated Historical Districts, the highest quality education available to our children in modernized facilities, a community center that serves our residents well, safe and supportive facilities for senior residents, keeping the availability of harmful substances away from our young generation, and most of all, keeping Lincoln safe.

If these are your interests and you want to be assured that you will have someone representing them, then vote in Lincoln’s election on March 30. I always have time to listen to people’s concerns and suggestions. You can email me at DeLisi76@aol.com or phone me at 781-257-5046.


Robert Domnitz

Mill Street

Robert Domnitz

(Editor’s note: Domnitz is a former member of the Planning Board who narrowly lost his bid for reelection in 2015.)

What is your previous experience in town government?

I served on the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission from 1985–1991. In Lexington, I was member/chair of the Lexington Planning Board from 1990–1995 and a Town Meeting Representative from 1986–1995. I was member/chair of the Lincoln Planning Board from 2003–2015

In the next few years, what do you think are the most important issue(s) facing the Planning Board, and how would you tackle them if elected?

The Planning Board has given top priority to promotion of increased business activity and housing in the Lincoln Station area. They are developing a complex revision to the town’s zoning bylaw which they believe will foster this development. A key feature of their proposal is that they — and they alone — will have authority to approve large-scale development proposals without review by Town Meeting. This is a dramatic departure from our traditional reliance on Town Meeting for major decisions.

I revere our Town Meeting form of government. As a member of the Planning Board, I will work to ensure that Town Meeting continues to play a central role in Lincoln’s decisions about land use. I believe that the Planning Board’s effort to foster revitalization of Lincoln Station without meaningful participation of Town Meeting will be divisive and will fail. Conversely, with Town Meeting’s participation, we have the opportunity to welcome projects that appeal to neighbors, business owners, and the town at large. Again and again, we have proven that our Town Meeting can take decisive action when it’s needed. I will do my best to make sure that Town Meeting gets the balanced information it needs to make those bold, prudent decisions.

Why did you decide to run for the Planning Board again?

In recent years, many residents have become increasingly concerned as our Annual Town Meeting has turned into a mostly routine exercise that “rubber stamps” the proposals that are presented. Our boards and committees almost invariably present unanimous, seamless recommendations. If there is another side to the issue, it is rarely presented for our consideration.

The Planning Board’s current zoning proposal accelerates this worrisome trend. It authorizes the board to approve major projects in Lincoln Station without Town Meeting’s participation in the decision-making process. These projects can have profound impacts on virtually every aspect of Lincoln: finances, services, school population, traffic, and Lincoln’s overall character. I feel we should not rely on five future Planning Board members to make these important decisions. As a member of the Planning Board, I would work to preserve the vitality and relevance of our Town Meeting.


Rick Rundell

Todd Pond Road

Rick Rundell

What background and experience do you offer?

I am a Massachusetts registered architect with over three decades experience in the building industry and a member of the American Institute of Architects. I hold credentials from the National Council of Architectural Registration Boards and the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) program of the U.S. Green Building Council. I presently work in the software industry, where I lead innovation programs focused on architecture, engineering, and construction. I hold a master’s degree in architecture from Harvard University and a B.A. in engineering science from Dartmouth College.

My wife Virginia and I came to Lincoln in 2012 with our two children and small flock of chickens, drawn by its unique character, connection to nature, and the thoughtful planning of its beautiful neighborhoods. The children are now in college and the flock has flown—and meanwhile, Virginia and I have become deeply committed to the community, serving on several local volunteer boards and organizations.

I was recruited to the Planning Board shortly after arriving in Lincoln by then-member Bob Domnitz because he felt the board lacked a professional architect. I agreed, and since then I have brought the energetic perspective of an active, engaged professional to the board. I am a registered architect in the state of Massachusetts and the sole candidate for the board with an architectural background. I’ve served on the Planning Board since 2012, including as chair in 2015, and have been one of two Board members appointed to the Historic District Commission since 2013. I have also been president of the Todd Pond Residents Association since 2013.

Why are you excited about serving on the Planning Board?

We’ve seen tremendous changes in the Planning Board over the last few years. I am especially proud of the amendments to the Zoning By-Law passed by Town Meeting in 2018 as Article 27. This measure, by putting a five-year sunset on site plan review requirements, finally put limits on the creeping power of the Planning Board as property after property had become permanently encumbered under site plan review, with the obligation to bring even the most trivial improvements before the board. Changes that many residents could make as of right were closed off to property owners once they had fallen under site plan review. Though the article was opposed by a former board member at that Town Meeting, the measure passed resoundingly. That today’s board proposed a measure to so limit its own power made me proud to be a member, and proud of our Town Meeting process. It is also evidence of the change represented by today’s board that has benefited the citizens of Lincoln.

The challenges to Lincoln come largely from the world around us—changes to demographics, the economics of retail, the cost of public infrastructure, development in towns around us that impact our residents without benefiting them, and even the legalization of marijuana. With the newly professionalized board and Planning Department that is bringing hundreds of thousands of grant dollars to Lincoln for civic improvements, and with the level of civic engagement in the town, I see a tremendous opportunities to respond to these challenges in ways that continue to preserve and increase the health and character of the town.

The opportunities presented by having our own rail station, world-class cultural facilities, and spectacular rural landscapes in conservation allow Lincoln to punch well above its weight as a vibrant, diverse, and engaging community. My experience with Town Meeting since first attending on our arrival in 2012 leaves me with nothing but respect for direct democracy, and I have seen time and time again where authentic discourse has led to great results.

Category: elections, government Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

Planning Board has the only contested seat in upcoming town election

February 12, 2020

By Alice Waugh

Signatures have been gathered and papers filed to decide who will be on the ballot for the town election on March 30 (see full list below). And despite an earlier flurry of interest by would-be candidates for Water Commission, the Planning Board will have the only contested race, where three residents — Lynn DeLisi, Richard Rundell, and Robert Domnitz — are running for two open seats.

Both openings on the Planning Board are for three-year terms, so the top two vote-getters will be seated. DeLisi and Rundell are incumbents running for reelection, while Domnitz is a former board member. He ran for reelection in 2015 but lost to challenge and current board member Gary Taylor, who ran unopposed for reelection in 2018.

A whopping seven residents took out papers in preparation for running for three openings on the Water Commission, which has been troubled by budget and personnel issues. However, only incumbent Ruth Ann Hendrickson, Michelle Barnes and James Hutchinson submitted papers and signatures to get on the ballot before the February 10 deadline. The others who initially took out papers were Ephraim Flint, Steven Kanner, Allen Vander Meulen, and Tobin Hack. 

Those running for the Water Commission have to declare their candidacy for a specific term. Hendrickson (who has said this will be her last term) is running unopposed for reelection for a two-yer term. Barnes joined the board in the fall as one of two emergency appointments after two of the three commissioners resigned, and she is now running for a full three-year term. Hutchinson is currently serving a seven-year term on the Finance Committee that expires in March 2021 and is resigning to run unopposed for a one-year term on the Water Commission.

No one is running for openings on the Housing Commission and Trustees of the Bemis Fund, although two residents (Deb Wallace and Victoria Benaflew) took our nomination papers but never submitted them. Anyone can write in a candidate for those seats or any other. However, if no one is elected, the group in question and the Board of Selectmen may jointly make an appointment to fill the opening at a later date.

There are two candidates for two openings on the Lincoln-Sudbury School Committee, and Lincoln resident Harold Engstrom is running for the seat being vacated by Patty Mostue, who is retiring after many years of service with that group. Candace Miller of Sudbury is running for reelection.

* Asterisks indicate incumbents

Board or CommitteeOpenings/termsCandidate(s)
Board of AssessorsOne for three yearsEllen Meadors*
Board of Health
One for three yearsFrederick L. Mansfield*
Board of SelectmenOne for three yearsJonathan Dwyer*
Cemetery CommissionOne for three yearsManley Boyce*
Commissioners of Trust FundsOne for three yearsD. Paul Fitzgerald*
Housing CommissionOne for three years—
ModeratorOne for three yearsSarah Cannon Holden*
Lincoln-Sudbury Regional District School CommitteeTwo for three yearsCandace Miller,* Harold Engstrom
Parks and Recreation CommitteeOne for three yearsRobert Stringer
Planning BoardTwo for three yearsRichard Rundell,* Lynn DeLisi,* Robert Domnitz
School CommitteeTwo for three yearsTara Lynn Mitchell,* Adam Hogue*
Trustees of BemisOne for three years—
Water CommissionOne for three years, one for two years, one for one yearRuth Ann Hendrickson,* Michelle Barnes, James Hutchinson

Category: elections, government, news Tagged: elections 1 Comment

Voters approve ban on cannabis businesses in Lincoln

March 26, 2019

Lincoln voters have affirmed a ban on cannabis retail businesses in Lincoln that was first passed at a Special Town Meeting in October 2018.

  • Unofficial results of 2019 town election

Lincoln residents voted in favor of legalizing sales of recreational marijuana in Massachusetts in a statewide vote in 2016. Because of that result, state law required a twi0thirds majority at Town Meeting and a simple majority in an election if residents wanted to ban cannabis businesses within Lincoln. The ban can be reversed by another vote in the future if the town wishes, but once cannabis sales are legalized, they can’t be banned later. 

In unofficial results, the ban was affirmed this week by a margin of 279-126 (69% to 31%) on the ballot question. Last October, the ban achieved the required two-thirds majority by a tally of 73% to 27%.

Personal, noncommercial growing and possession of recreational marijuana are unaffected. Massachusetts law allows residents 21 and older to use the drug and have up to one ounce on their person (up to 10 ounces in their homes). Households with one adult over 21 can also grow up to six marijuana plants, or 12 plants if there are two adults in the household.

The Lincoln move also will have no effect on potential home delivery of marijuana products, should the state’s Cannabis Control Commission decide to allow it. As the law now stands, medical dispensaries can deliver cannabis products to registered patients but doesn’t permit deliveries of recreational pot.

Residents also voted in a new slate of town officials in this week’s election (though none of the races was contested). Click here for full election results. 

 

Category: businesses, elections, government, news Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

Election ballot includes marijuana question

March 19, 2019

For the first time in recent memory, the March 25 town election does not feature any contested races—but there’s a ballot question that will decide whether marijuana retail establishments will be allowed in town.

Because Lincoln residents voted in favor of legalizing recreational marijuana in the 2016 state election, a ban on retail establishments in town requires two things: a two-thirds majority at Town Meeting, and a simple majority at the ballot box. The ban passed by a vote of 73–27% (140–53) at a Special Town Meeting in October 2018. Monday’s election is the second step needed to enact the ban. A “yes” vote will affirm the ban that was approved in October.

The regulatory path for banning marijuana businesses is a one-way street; a ban can always be reversed in the future, but once legalized, they can’t be prohibited later. A retail ban would not affect the statewide legalization of possession (in limited quantities) and private use of marijuana for medical and recreational purposes.

Click here to see a previously published list of residents running for town office. A sample ballot appears below; click on the image to see larger versions.

Category: businesses, elections, government Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

Primary results for Lincoln

September 5, 2018

In the September 4 primary for Massachusetts governor, Lincoln opted for Democrat Jay Gonzalez by a margin of 71% to 29% and Republican incumbent Charlie Baker, 78% to 22%, in the only category where both parties had a contested primary. The tables below show Lincoln’s results for the contested races for each party (write-in and blank ballots are not included in the totals).

  • Full results for Lincoln Democrats (unofficial)
  • Full results for Lincoln Republicans (unofficial)
  • Statewide results
Democratic candidatePrecinct 1Precinct 2Total
GOVERNOR
Jay Gonzalez482249731
Bob Massie198101299
LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR
Quentin Palfrey500263763
Jimmy Tingle15580235
SECRETARY OF STATE
William Galvin468243711
Zakim246120366
GOVERNOR'S COUNCIL
Marilyn Petitto Devaney274137411
Nick Carter391201592
DISTRICT ATTORNEY
Marian Ryan210127337
Donna Patalano484233707

Republican candidatePrecinct 1Precinct 2Total
GOVERNOR
Charlie Baker9667165
Scott Lively281947
U.S. SENATOR
Geoff Diehl473684
John Kingston242044
Beth Lindstrom402768
ATTORNEY GENERAL
James McMahon464188
Dan Shores422264
U.S. REPRESENTATIVE
John Hugo413677
Louis Kuchnir402868

Category: elections, government Tagged: elections 1 Comment

Glass, MacLachlan win in election’s two contested seats

March 27, 2017

Board of Selectmen candidates Jonathan Dwyer, Allen Vander Meulen, and Jennifer Glass shared a tent to keep off the rain at the entrance to the Smith School polling place on Monday.

Jennifer Glass easily beat Allen Vander Meulen for the contested one-year vacancy on the Board of Selectmen by a margin of 609-91 (87% to 13%) in the March 27 town election.

In the only other contested seat, John MacLachlan bested Stanley Solomon for a three-year term as Bemis trustee by a margin of 66% to 33% (328 votes to 167 votes).

“This evening I had the honor of being the first to congratulate Jennifer Glass for her win in today’s vote in the contest to decide which of us would fill the final year of the retiring Renel Fredriksen’s seat on Lincoln’s Board of Selectmen,” Vander Meulen wrote on LincolnTalk Monday night. “I did not know Jennifer before we began this contest, but over the last couple of months, I have come to know her as a gracious, intelligent, and tough adversary, and a great person to hang out with and chat on cold, rainy March days. I know that Jennifer will serve Lincoln well, just as she already has in her years on Lincoln’s School Committee, and I look forward to working with her as we each in our own ways continue our labors on behalf of this town and its people that we both love.”

Glass just finished three terms on the School Committee; Vander Meulen is chair of the Housing Commission and its delegate to the newly formed South Lincoln Project Implementation Committee, as well as a member of the Housing Trust.

The new Board of Selectmen will consist of James Craig, who ran unopposed in 2016 for the seat formerly held by Noah Eckhouse; Glass; and Jonathan Dwyer, who ran unopposed this week for the open seat of former Selectman Peter Braun.

Category: elections, government Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

Olson, Gladstone win Planning Board seats

March 28, 2016

In the two contested offices in the March 28 town election, Planning Board seats were won by incumbent Margaret Olson and Stephen Gladstone, while former Selectman Sara Mattes beat Stanley Solomon by a margin of nearly 2-1 in the race for Bemis Trustee.

Overall, the Planning Board votes were closely divided among the three candidates, with Gladstone taking the most at 37 percent, followed by Olson with 33 percent and Jennifer Morris Gundy with 29 percent. However, each of the town’s two precincts had different results. In a very close race in Precinct 1 (the southwest side of town), Olson, Gundy and Gladstone finished first, second and third respectively. In Precinct 2, Gladstone won by a wide margin, followed by Olson and Gundy.

Here are the complete unofficial results:

Town of Lincoln annual town election – March 28, 2016
Prec. 1 Prec. 2 Total
BOARD OF SELECTMEN
James E. Craig 215 94 309
Blanks 43 36 79
Write-in 2 0 2
BOARD OF ASSESSORS
John G. Robinson 214 93 307
Blanks 46 37 83
Write-in 0 0 0
BOARD OF HEALTH
Steven R. Kanner 206 88 294
Blanks 53 42 95
Write-in 1 0 1
CEMETERY COMMISSION
Conrad H. Todd 218 97 315
Blanks 40 33 73
Write-in 2 0 2
COMMISSIONER OF TRUST FUNDS
Douglas B. Harding 223 95 318
Blanks 37 35 72
Write-in 0 0 0
DeCORDOVA TRUSTEE
Dune D. Thorne 209 87 296
Blanks 49 43 92
Write-in 2 0 2
HOUSING COMMISSION
Sharon K. Antia 207 88 295
Blanks 51 41 92
Write-in 2 1 3
TOWN CLERK
Susan F. Brooks 228 110 338
Blanks 30 20 50
Write-in 2 0 2
LSRHS SCHOOL COMMITTEE (vote for 2)
Radha Raman Gargeya 199 79 278
Kevin J. Matthews 183 70 253
Blanks 138 111 249
Write-in 0 0 0
PARKS AND RECREATION
Patricia M. Donahue 212 95 307
Blanks 48 35 83
Write-in 0 0 0
PLANNING BOARD (vote for 2)
Setha Margaret Olson 146 59 205
Stephen R. Gladstone 135 94 229
Jennifer Morris Gundy 139 42 181
Blanks 99 65 164
Write-in 1 0 1
SCHOOL COMMITTEE
Timothy H.T. Christenfeld 207 34 241
Blanks 49 0 49
Write-in 4 0 4
BEMIS TRUSTEE (vote for 1)
Sara A. Mattes 151 84 235
Stanley J. Solomon 101 37 138
Blanks 8 0 8
Write-in 0 0 0
WATER COMMISSIONER
Patrick J. Lawler 213 39 252
Blanks 47 0 47
Write-in 0 0 0
LINCOLN LIBRARY TRUSTEE
Jennifer A. James 212 36 248
Blanks 46 0 46
Write-in 2 0 2
Question 1. To assess an additional $320,000 in taxes for DPW equipment
YES 206 22 228
NO 31 18 49
Blank 23 0 23
Question 2. Minuteman High School debt
YES 128 44 172
NO 67 40 107
Blank 65 0 65

 

Category: elections, government Tagged: elections 5 Comments

Town election is on Monday

March 27, 2015

Screen Shot 2015-03-26 at 12.46.23 PMOn Monday, March 30, polls will be open in the Smith gym from 7:30 a.m. to 8 p.m. for the town election, which includes numerous town office races and two ballot questions (see sample ballot at right; click to enlarge).

Two of the races (Planning Board and Lincoln-Sudbury School Committee) are contested. Below are links to letters to the editor in the Lincoln Squirrel about these races, listed in chronological order.

Planning Board
  • Letter to the editor: vote for Domnitz (March 24)
  • Letter to the editor: group of residents supports Gary Taylor (March 23)
  • Letter to the editor: Taylor asks for your vote (March 23)
  • Letter to the editor: support Domnitz for reelection (March 23)
  • Letter to the editor: Domnitz “comes down on the neighborhood’s side” (March 18)
  • Letter to the editor: vote for Domnitz (March 16)
  • Letter to the editor: support Taylor for Planning Board (March 6)
  • Letter to the editor: Taylor running for Planning Board (January 11)
  • Letter to the editor: Domnitz running for reelection to Planning Board (January 7)
Lincoln-Sudbury School Committee

(Editor’s note: residents may vote for two of three names on the ballot. The Lincoln Squirrel has not received any letters to the editor from candidate Robert G. Stein of Sudbury, although he is mentioned in Eric Harris’s letter on March 23).

  • Letter to the editor: vote on Monday for Marshall and Quirk (March 23)
  • Letter to the editor: Marshall is “the whole package” (March 18)
  • Letter to the editor: Marshall deserves reelection (March 17)
  • Letter to the editor: vote for Quirk, Marshall (March 16)
  • Letter to the editor: vote for Marshall (March 15)
  • Letter to the editor: Quirk runs for reelection to LSSC (March 3)
  • Letter to the editor: Marshall seeks voter support (March 2)
  • Letter to the editor: reelect Nancy Marshall (March 1)

Category: elections, news Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

Primary election results for Lincoln and Mass.

September 10, 2014

Following are the results for contested primary races in the September 9 Massachusetts election. Lincoln percentages are for total number of ballots cast, including blanks and write-ins. [Read more…] about Primary election results for Lincoln and Mass.

Category: elections, government, news Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

Braun beats Cannistraro in surprisingly close Selectman’s race

April 2, 2014

ballotIn unofficial results from the March 31 town election, incumbent Selectman Peter Braun defeated challenger Vincent Cannistraro by a vote of 487-382, or 56 to 46 percent. Braun’s margin of victory was about the same in both precincts. Precinct 1, which includes the southern and western portion of Lincoln, went to Braun by 56 to 44 percent, while Precinct 2 (the northeastern part of town) voted for Braun 55 to 45 percent.

Candidate Precinct 1 Precinct 2 Total votes
Peter Braun 320 167 487
Vincent Cannistraro 242 130 372
Blanks 7 9 16

In the only other contested race, Patricia Mostue of Lincoln and Elena Kleifges of Sudbury retained their seats on the Lincoln-Sudbury Regional School District Committee by winning the highest totals tallied from the unofficial results from Lincoln and Sudbury:

Candidate Lincoln votes Sudbury votes Total votes
Patricia Mostue 796 1,415 2,211
Elena Kleifges 236 1,842 2,087
Sofya L. Gruman-Reznik 62 1,121 1,183
Blanks/write-ins 656 1,918 2,574

The two ballot questions in Lincoln were overwhelmingly approved. By a vote of 729 to 83, residents approved granting one-day alcohol licenses to nonprofits for special events, subject to Board of Selectmen approval in each case. By a vote of 731 to 86, voters OK’d a beer and wine license for the deCordova Sculpture Park and Museum. Although alcohol has been served at the deCordova in the past, the museum had been required to hire licensed outside vendors to do so.

Candidates comment

Vincent Cannistraro

Cannistraro said he was “absolutely thrilled” at the closeness of the vote. “I think a lot of people were really surprised. I don’t think anybody thought I would get more than 30 percent of the vote” with no endorsements from town officials. “I think it spoke a lot about how the town is trying to cope with this concept of change over time.”

“I’m pleased that voters reelected me and that I’ll have the opportunity to continue to serve the town for another three years in a volunteer capacity and give back to my community,” Braun said.

“I valued the many conversations I had with people across all segments of our community,” Braun continued. “I learned a lot, and I’m eager to continue to learn from as many people as I possibly can, including having the opportunity to speak to people who did not vote for me so I can continue to have as comprehensive understanding of residents’ issues as I can.”

Peter Braun

Asked if he was surprised at his relatively narrow margin of victory, Braun said he was. “It appears to have been the case that there was an organized effort by more than just the candidate to convince people to vote for my opponent,” he said.

Shortly before the election, Cannistraro wrote and dictated a “robocall” that was phoned to what he said was somewhere between 500 and 1,000 homes in Lincoln. In his call, which he supplied to the Lincoln Squirrel on Wednesday (read transcript here), he asked residents to vote in the election and outlined his experience in the construction industry. “I wanted people to always see or hear me directly and not take it from my friend or my acquaintance,” he said.

Using call-em-all.com, customers can record their message and have it robocalled to a list of phone numbers they upload for a about nine cents per number. Cannistraro said he aimed his robocall at phone numbers for residents who he guessed had lived in Lincoln for 10 to 20 years and/or were 45 to 60 years old. He did not include every Lincoln  number to keep the cost down, adding that he spent $70 or $80 of his own money. The tactic is comparable to the one by an unknown person who put pro-Braun flyers under the doors of residents at The Commons, he added.

To anyone who might have thought robocalling was not “proper politics,” Cannistraro said, “That really depends on your perspective. I don’t think it’s appropriate for people you appoint to come out and endorse you,” he added, referring to a letter to the editor of the Lincoln Squirrel in which Conservation Commission co-chair Peter Von Mertens (who was appointed by the Board of Selectmen) expressed support for Braun before the election.

“It was a campaign of contrasts, to a certain degree—older vs. younger, insider vs. outsider experienced vs. a new perspective,” Cannistraro said. “That’s what interested me about the campaign. It wasn’t a personal thing about Peter… I think he ran a great campaign and it’s obvious that he loves Lincoln, and I respect him for that completely.” Cannistraro thanked various people including Braun  in a letter posted on Lincoln Blogs the Future, a blog by resident Neil Feinberg, who was until recently a columnist for the Lincoln Journal.

“I really was a political nobody, and I think the result made a statement,” said Cannistraro, who has never held public office in Lincoln but said he would be interested in serving on a town board or commission in the future. “I’d feel compelled to serve for the people who supported me if I have the time to do a good job. It’s definitely a possibility,” he said.Asked which area of town government would interest him, he said, “I think my strengths are probably in the finance/CapComm [Capital Planning Committee] area… I’m really tuned into the fact that the town has a lot of potentially big-ticket items out there that they’re grappling with.” He added that he might also be interested in serving on the new School Building Advisory Committee that will be formed to work with consultants on identifying specific school repair/renovation project items and costs, “but maybe they want a fresh face of their own,” said Cannistraro, who served on the first SBAC.

Category: elections, government, news Tagged: elections Leave a Comment

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • My Turn: Change how FinCom members are named June 10, 2025
  • Town Meeting procedures to be finalized on Wednesday June 9, 2025
  • My Turn: Almost 200 residents urge passage of Nature Link proposal June 8, 2025
  • Breyer reflects on Supreme Court career at talk in Lincoln June 5, 2025
  • Select Board endorses Panetta/Farrington Project June 4, 2025

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2025 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.