The School Committee has voted unanimously to recommend that the town move forward with a Lincoln-funded school project and not reapply for state funding.
There will be a multi-board meeting on Monday, Jan. 30 at 7 p.m. in the Brooks gym to discuss the school project. In an earlier announcement about that meeting, the committee said it would sponsor two Town Meeting warrant articles: one asking whether the town should go ahead and spend $750,000 that was appropriated in 2015 on a feasibility study for a town-funded school project, and whether to apply again to the Massachusetts State Building Authority (MSBA) for a grant.
“We view these two articles as either/or,” School Committee Chair Jennifer Glass told the Board of Selectman at its January 25 meeting. “We’re saying we’ve reached a point where there are two directions and we’re asking the town which way we should go, and our recommendation is to go the first way.”
The physical condition of the Lincoln School and the need for educational improvements means that continuing to hope for uncertain MSBA funding is no longer a good option, according to Glass. “Each year we delay in this process, we risk failure of some major system such as a roof or boiler,” she said, adding that construction costs have “gone up pretty dramatically” over the past several years.
As the School Committee has learned more about the workings of the MSBA, it’s also become less confident that it will be invited into the funding pipeline again anytime soon, Glass said. Meetings with MSBA officials after the 2016 and 2016 rejections have shown “just how competitive a process it is… and have given us a pretty clear-eyed vision of where we are in terms of those [MSBA funding] criteria,” she said.
There is also some level of community agreement that a town-funded school is the best option at this point, Glass added. “We’ve built a lot of excitement and consensus that it’s time to address this. It feels like there’s this moment of opportunity,” she said. Furthermore, those hoping for construction of a community center “will have clearer path when we figure out what’s going on with the school.”
Applying to the MSBA while also pursuing a Lincoln-funded project “would send a mixed message to the state” and would also risk wasting its $750,000 outlay, because if Lincoln eventually got invited into the MSBA funding pipeline, it would have to do a completely new feasibility study, Glass said. Similarly, the School Committee is unwilling to waste the effort of another School Building Committee in the event state money ever appeared.
“It is incredibly intense to be on a School Building Committee,” she said. “I’m not comfortable asking our fellow townspeople to make that kind of investment and then say ‘Whoops, sorry, we’re putting that aside and were going to start again and hire a new architect and a new OPM [owner’s project manager]… it feels like we just need to decide.”
Glass concluded by saying her panel will seek support for its position from as many town government bodies as possible, including the Board of Selectmen.
“I commend the School Committee for putting a stake in the ground on this,” Selectman Peter Braun said.
Faced with the need to borrow a substantial sum of money, selectmen said they hoped the Finance Committee would be receptive to increasing the town’s debt stabilization fund, which currently stands at about $3.7 million. “As a town, we need to start examining what strategies we can take for a large-scale [funding] process,” Selectman James Craig said.