My Turn

By the Mothers Out Front Lincoln leadership team

Lincoln’s Mothers Out Front leadership team enthusiastically endorses HCA Option C.

We believe that transit-friendly housing is a climate solution. By increasing housing density near public transportation and within the town center, Lincoln will be part of the solution to both the regional housing crisis and climate. In Lincoln and statewide, we feel that housing, climate, quality of life, diversity, inclusion, and a thriving economy are all critically important community issues.

We therefore support enacting zoning changes that comply with both the law and spirit of the MBTA Communities Act. We vigorously encourage construction of additional housing at the mall and near Lincoln’s train station. Option C is the only plan that does not increase density near or in the expanding Hanscom airport and Lincoln’s one environmental justice community.

We encourage the town to continue advancing a broad program of climate mitigation, environmental justice, and resilience strategies through our 2023 Climate Action Plan, including sustainable building practices, ecological landscaping around new development, and minimizing carbon emissions.

We extend our sincere appreciation to our Select Board, the Housing Choice Act Working Group, town staff, and all who have worked towards developing these zoning options.

We wholeheartedly hope you will join us on Saturday and Vote for Option C.

Lincoln’s Mothers Out Front leadership team members are Emily Haslett, Staci Montori, Rachel Neurath, Trish O’Hagan, and Candace Pearson.

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

By Peter Braun

In the interest of enhancing rational discussion about the proposed rezoning options, I am repeating and elaborating on the gist of a comment I posted a couple of days ago in the Lincoln Squirrel in response to Ruth Ann Hendrickson’s article.

This is not just an Option C vs. Option E debate. The Working Group and Select Board have wisely offered us some potential alternatives, which I view as potential compromise solutions. As a lawyer, I was always interested in potential compromises, so I appreciate their having offered some more choices than just Option C or bust.

Options D-1, D-2, and D-3 all offer the same benefit as Option C in terms of rezoning the mall and rezoning some other parcels in South Lincoln. In fact, they could have been labeled C-1, C-2, and C-3. And they all include large amounts of areas that are understood to be highly unlikely to be developed (Lincoln Woods and Ryan Estate). Those unlikely-to-be-developed areas, as well as the unlikely-to-be-developed areas in North Lincoln included in several options, are, to my mind, just benign puzzle pieces to satisfy the state’s 42-acre requirement.

Rather than be distracted by these benign puzzle pieces, I have tried to focus on where the real action is, in South Lincoln. That’s where the public transit is. That’s where our commercial area is. That’s where we have pointed to for many years as the area for some sort of “walkable village.” That’s where the Working Group has appropriately focused.

In trying to sort out which of these four “C-related” options are preferable, the question for me is how much South Lincoln development besides the mall itself are we willing to enable by right, now and forever. I am totally in favor of by-right rezoning for the mall itself, and I trust their judgment. That will entail a large addition of housing and much-needed revamping of the mall’s commercial and public spaces. How much more by-right development in South Lincoln do we want, and how likely is it to occur?

Jennifer Glass’s excellent presentation materials at this week’s Mothers Out Front meeting very well articulated what our choices are in terms of what areas could be developed in reality, depending on what the property owners and potential developers decide to do. As I understand what was presented, in the case of D-3, our choice is the mall plus the properties across the street (essentially between Ridge Road and the Ryan Estates, going several blocks in from the road), with a maximum collective potential of 262 new housing units. For D-1 or D-2, focusing only on their South Lincoln aspects, it’s the mall plus the properties across the street and the properties within the Lincoln Road/Codman Road/Lewis Street/railroad tracks rectangle, with a maximum collective potential of 383 new units. For Option C, it’s the mall plus the properties across the street, the properties within the aforementioned rectangle, and the properties further along Codman Road down to 117, with a maximum collective potential of 480 new units. The tale of the numbers: 480 vs. 383 vs. 262.

There are many factors that would drive whether and how much of these areas other than the mall (which has its own development trajectory) will actually be redeveloped for multi-family housing. Among these factors are assembling (buying) enough contiguous parcels, septic infrastructure, wetlands, and parking (which, in my mind, could realistically necessitate designing for one or possibly two cars per housing unit). As others have mentioned, all of these factors and their cost would be balanced by potential developers against the multiple other opportunities that are sure to arise in other communities as the impact of the HCA takes hold. In the meantime, in the absence of an effective crystal ball, all we have to go on are the maximum developable units articulated by Jennifer.

My personal opinion is that D-3 offers us a big chunk of what many want — redevelop the mall and open the door to nearby by-right multi-family housing (across the street) — and offers what some, like me, may want, which is a chance to see what happens if as many as 262 new housing units and the inevitable car-usage are added to that area, before we enable even more within the aforementioned rectangle and along Codman. Others may have a different risk tolerances and/or may anticipate that the amount of development enabled by Option C or one of the other Ds will be significantly less than the maximums.

Reasonable people can debate the merits of all options. But, again, we do have multiple options. My two cents, in hopes of stimulating rational dialogue.

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

By Ken Hurd

At one of the recent forums hosted by the HCAWG (Housing Choice Act Working Group), one particularly insightful resident posed a poignant question to the proponents of an alternative Option E. She asked, “What is it you stand for?”

Although there was no immediate response, we now know the answer, according to the mailing most residents recently received about a meeting planned by proponents of Option E. You can find it on the back of the flyer under the label “Our Guiding Principles,” and I would like to highlight what I see as some inconsistencies.

Create more affordable housing

Many proponents of an alternative Option E express concern that the HCA limits the percentage of affordable housing to 10%. Because Lincoln normally requires 15% affordable units in any multi-family development, the delta of their concern is 5%. In Lincoln’s case, the HCA requires zoning that will allow 635 units, and 5% of that would be 32 units. As a reminder, the HCAWG responded early on to the residents of the Ridge Court Condominium property, a.k.a. the “flying nun” apartments. Despite the fact that this property is one of the most logical to include in the rezoning, they asked to be excluded in order to preserve the 36 units of relatively affordable apartments that already exist. The HCAWG agreed, and the delta of this exclusion represents more than the 5% about which the alternative proponents are so concerned.

Protect commercial retail in our village center

To anyone who has paid any attention to the state of retail services in Lincoln Station over the last ten years, they might have noticed a decline or turnover in establishments and an increase in vacancies. This is occurring not just at the mall but in the entire Lincoln Station area. As noted in the 2010 Comprehensive Long Range Plan, “the town needs to be receptive to more housing near the train station,” and as was predicted in 2010, “small businesses currently operating around the train station may find it very difficult to survive in the future unless the area includes more housing and, ironically, more businesses.” Absent more housing, existing retail will most likely continue to wither away.

Safeguard Lincoln’s wetlands protection bylaw

As noted multiple times by the HCAWG, all underlying regulations required by the bylaws of Lincoln will continue in effect, and that includes all wetland protections currently in place.  

Focus on locations with existing infrastructure while minimizing the need for greenfield construction

If this means rezoning Battle Road Farm, it would appear that this is no more than a tactic to subvert the intent of the Housing Choice Act since condominium regulations make it nearly impossible to create new housing in that location.

Preserve historically significant properties

A worthy goal, but with the few significant properties that exist in the Lincoln Station area, this could most likely be accommodated by any of the options with a minor adjustment.

Honor the legacy of past generations’s work to create a variety of housing choices and multi-family housing

Most Lincolnites, particularly those who know the town’s history, will agree with this statement. Time and again, previous generations have stepped up to do more than Lincoln’s fair share in preserving open space while also increasing our housing stock to accommodate a variety of needs. In my opinion, it would be a slap in their ancestral faces to shirk our responsibility to the region by raising the drawbridge and rezoning for the least amount of new housing possible while claiming compliance.

Save our key in-town parcels from HCA’s 90% market-rate zoning mandate, allowing funds from Lincoln’s limited Affordable Housing Trust to be more wisely spent for much-needed low- and moderate-income housing units in Lincoln

To me, there is no correlation between saving in-town parcels and using AHT funds for needed housing. This “principle” advocates for nothing more than kicking the can down the road toward inaction. 

Finally, I think we can all agree that the Housing Choice Act is forcing our hand no less than in many of the surrounding communities. I hope that we can rise to meet this challenge as past Lincoln residents have done so many times before. There is no question in my mind that we can be as creative as our forbears and find solutions that will maintain the town’s character that we all cherish. I sincerely believe that this will be best achieved by voting for Option C.  

So please, join me in supporting Option C as the best way to revive the Lincoln Station area as well as to meet our responsibility to the region by creating more actual housing consistent with our town vision statement, namely:

“Fostering economic, racial, ethnic, and age diversity among its citizenry through its educational, housing and other public policy.”

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

By Jonathan Soo

All Lincoln residents should feel threatened by how Option E supporters changed the rules so that they could force a plan developed in secret by an unaccountable private group onto the December 2 Town Meeting ballot and making what should have been an unofficial survey into a binding vote* for the plan that will be presented at the March 2024 Town Meeting.

In 2022, after the MBTA Communities Act was signed into law, the town created a detailed plan describing how it would develop a zoning bylaw. The town committed to having a town working group create a new zoning bylaw, followed by public hearings leading up to the March 2024 Town Meeting.

The town’s Housing Choice Act Working Group (HCAWG) collectively spent hundreds of hours evaluating and developing a number of options, gathering feedback from affected residents in a series of information sessions, and carefully ensuring that the proposed options meet not only the state’s requirements but also federal Fair Housing Act requirements, Lincoln’s Comprehensive Long Range Plan, and other obligations. 

This fall, a small group of people opposed to additional housing in the town center decided that rather than making their case in March, they would hijack the process by developing their own plan using every loophole available to make sure no new housing could be built there. This plan was developed in secret by a small group of self-selected insiders, with no minutes or records of who participated or even when meetings were held.

On November 14, the Select Board voted to change the rules of the game. It asked HCAWG to rubber-stamp Option E so that it could be added to the ballot without review, and announced that the informal survey at the December 2 Town Meeting would be changed into a binding vote to select the option to be placed on the March ballot, effectively adding a primary vote to the process with two weeks’ notice — with one of those two weeks being the Thanksgiving holiday.

Even if Option E was developed in a legitimate way, changing the December 2 vote from a survey to a binding vote is an incredibly unfair change to the process. It is simply not possible for town residents to digest and evaluate all of the options in just a few days, especially since one of the options has only been publicly known for a single week. Too many residents will be entering the meeting with no real understanding of the implications of voting for each choice, to be swayed by a few minutes of rhetoric before the vote.

On top of this, many residents will be unable to rearrange their schedules at short notice to attend the meeting, assuming they hear about the changes at all. Most residents interested in the process still have a postcard on their refrigerators describing the December 2 meeting as “‘Sense of the Town’ from residents via an informal paper ballot on preferred option – C or D.”

Of course, Option E was not developed in a legitimate way — not in any way that should be acceptable for the town to place on a binding ballot. By placing it on the ballot and stating that it is a viable choice for the March 3 vote, the Selects are saying that the town stands behind it morally, ethically, and legally. No zoning law developed in secret should be allowed on any town ballot.

Every Lincoln resident, no matter which of the town’s options they support (C, D1, D2, or D3), should go to Town Meeting and vote against Option E as long as it has not been rejected. 

* Editor’s note: Although the vote is binding, changes may still be made to bring the measure into compliance with state law if necessary — see the HCAWG website (Q&A #4 under “2023 11 22 FAQs).”

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

By Ruth Ann Hendrickson

I support new and more affordable housing in Lincoln, and I’d like to see most of it in the area of the train station and the Lincoln Mall. I will therefore be supporting option C at the Special Town Meeting on December 2.

1. Option C is the best hope for retaining the retail businesses at the mall. I remember when the roof caved in and Donelan’s was out of business for over a year. We missed them terribly. If we even needed a pint of cream, we had to go out of town.

Retail is struggling all over the country, but I notice that West Concord (population 7,003 per census data: ACS 2021), which developed a large apartment complex near the Nashoba Brook a few years ago, has managed to retain real retail, not just banks and restaurants. I am hoping that with enough new housing in the mall area, we also could have a thriving retail center.

2. History shows that adding new housing enriches the town. Yes, change is always worrisome. When Farrar Pond Village near where I live was proposed, the neighbors were violently against it because of traffic fears. The traffic has not materialized, and Farrar Pond Village has turned out to be a wonderful place for Lincoln people to retire. Recently, because of the cost of housing, it has also attracted families with children, to the extent that they have built a playground.

When the town developed Lincoln Woods, people were aghast — a much denser than Farrar Pond Village, and right there in the middle of town! And yet I know someone who works at Donelan’s who is able to live there, and a friend of mine who has MS is also able to live there to be near her mother. This complex has definitely given living options to Lincoln people who needed it. The proposed new housing would again add housing for our children and those who work here.

3. Our agricultural heritage is safe. Remember, 40% of the Lincoln is permanently in conservation. Forty percent! Those fields will continue to be farmed by local farmers. Codman Community Farms belong to the town and will also remain in perpetuity. The trails we love to walk will always be there. Adding some higher density housing near the train station will not affect that.

4. Do not be fooled by Option E. Some think that, if we chose Option E, we can slow down and develop housing at our own pace under the Town Meeting process. Most of the towns around us, however, will have designated large areas as multifamily by right. What developer in his right mind would risk thousands of dollars to take a proposal to Town Meeting only to see it voted down, when he could easily go to the next town and develop something by right?

The RLF will be unable to replenish their endowment and revitalize the mall in this new housing development environment. Please vote to allow the RLF to develop the mall/housing complex by right. The RLF is a nonprofit whose mission is to assist the town of Lincoln in shaping its land-use destiny. History has show that they can be trusted to work to the town’s benefit.

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

By Lynne Smith

I support new and more affordable housing in Lincoln and I’d like to see some of it developed as the town has always done it, especially at the Lincoln Mall owned by the Rural Land Foundation. I would also like to see the preservation of our small retail area and a more vibrant commercial center.

At the Special Town Meeting on December 2, using ranked choice voting, Lincoln will select one option to be rezoned as required by the state’s Housing Choice Act (HCA). Lincoln’s HCA Working Group (HCAWG) will likely present five options, one of which was created by the recently formed Lincoln Residents for Housing Alternatives (LRHA) and is called Option E.

The Lincoln Process: ~ 800 multifamily units over 60 years

Over the last 60 years, Lincoln has added almost 800 multifamily homes — 40% of our total number of housing units.* During this time, the town process allowed us to hold on to the rural character of our town while welcoming new families to moderately priced homes, accommodating older people in age-restricted developments, and insuring that over 15% of homes were “affordable.”

The Housing Choice Act: 635+ new units allowed

The HCA requires that Lincoln rezone to allow a minimum of 635 units and gives developers “by right” zoning, which means they can bypass approvals by the Planning Board, Zoning Board, and Town Meeting (editor’s note: as long as they adhere to some preexisting requirements concerning height, wetlands, etc.). A maximum of just 10% may be zoned as affordable. At 635 units, Lincoln is the only MBTA community in the state asked to zone for an amount of units over 25% of its existing housing.  The reason is that the state model includes Hanscom housing in its calculation of Lincoln’s units although the town is not allowed to rezone any areas there.

My Conundrum

I have been struggling with this conundrum: I want new multifamily housing at market rate or below. I want to get credit for our many existing units. While I want some units developed soon, especially at the mall, I don’t want more than we can absorb and plan for all at once. Among many concerns, the following stand out for me.

• Lincoln Mall: This precious part of town near Donelan’s and the MBTA commuter rail stop is the logical place for new housing. The Rural Land Foundation has asked to have it rezoned to allow for mixed-use residential and commercial buildings. Recently, the HCAWG and the Selects have proposed that a new warrant article in March could ensure that traffic studies, parking, affordability, retail spaces, and other considerations would follow the Lincoln approval process. Option E is the only option that excludes the mall from HCA rezoning and would allow the town to shape the outcome collaboratively with a developer.

• Affordability: Lincoln is an expensive town, made more so by property taxes, which are not offset by commercial development, and by our wonderful conservation land, which increases land value. Because of today’s high construction costs, “luxury” condos and apartments are now the norm for developers who want to make a profit. HCA allows towns to require only 10% affordable units. If Lincoln wants more, this means the town must subsidize affordability as we did for Oriole Landing—or look for developers who have a good track record for building low-cost, high-quality, sustainable projects.The nonprofit Community Builders, current owners and operators of Lincoln Woods, are committed to that mission. Because Option E excludes the mall from HCA development, the town would be able to negotiate higher affordability while still actively allowing new housing and commercial spaces.

• Compliance and existing multifamily areas: Lincoln should get recognition for its existing multifamily developments. Rezoning some of these areas is a reasonable way to gain compliance with HCA requirements, which would make Lincoln eligible for state funds for infrastructure improvements such as our badly needed replacement water mains. Option E includes Lincoln Woods, Battle Road Farm, and areas along Lincoln Road as part of HCA rezoning.

Informed decision on December 2

I believe we can find a way to comply with HCA rules and also develop new housing units, especially at the Lincoln Mall, without sacrificing our Lincoln process. Option E will help us do just that. It would divide redevelopment evenly between the village center (45.7%) and North Lincoln (54.3%), would fully comply with HCA requirements, would avoid allowing for a greater number of units than called for, and would exempt Lincoln Mall development from HCA requirements. I hope everyone will review Option E here and be prepared to make an informed decision at the Special Town Meeting on December 2.

*~800 multifamily housing units developed over the last 60 years:

• 1966: 21 condos, Todd Pond
• 1970: 125 apartments, Lincoln Woods
• 1977: 80 condos, Farrar Pond
• 1979: 58 condos, Lincoln Ridge
• 1981: 25 condos, Green Ridge
• 1990: 120 town homes, Battle Road Farm
• 1991: 25 age-restricted condos, Ryan Estate
• 2000: ~262 age-restricted condos, The Commons
• 2006: 32 age-restricted condos, Minuteman Commons
• 2022: 60 apartments, Oriole Landing

Source caveat: Various online sites for each of the areas named may not have the exact number of units and dates are approximate based on available information.

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

By Lynne Smith

The Housing Choice Act (HCA) asks Massachusetts communities with public transit in the greater Boston area to rezone parts of their town to allow “by right” development of multifamily housing if they want to remain eligible for three state grant programs. “By right” means that the developer of the property would not have to go to Town Meeting to permit the development. The HCA Working Group (HCAWG) is currently developing rezoning options for Lincoln.

Using the models provided by the state for HCA compliance and building on the work of the HCAWG, a group calling themselves Lincoln Residents for Housing Alternatives has developed a range of new options that have real merit. They have included these options in an informative website that describes Lincoln’s particular parcels and suggests how rezoning might be accomplished without disturbing the character of the town.

The website offers a clear explanation of the compliance rules and the complex models used to develop the options. These simplified explanations in laymen’s terms helped me understand how we might rezone for maximum benefit to the town. The maps make clear how we can maintain our local and rural character by dispersing development as we have always done. In fact, 40% of Lincoln’s housing is already in multifamily developments scattered throughout the town. Over the last 60 years, this approach, requiring Town Meeting approval, has provided many units of housing requiring 15-25% affordability without increasing traffic or sacrificing conservation land.

The charts and spreadsheets in the website also make clear how we can:

• Avoid allocating a greater number of developable units than required for compliance. We must rezone for a minimum but care must be taken not to accidentally permit a maximum.
• Develop a greater percentage of affordable units by not making the RLF/Lincoln Station proposal “by right,” as HCA only allows us to require 10% affordable.
• Preserve wildlife corridors and minimize traffic by carefully situating the rezoned areas in parcels that are already developed.

The website also explains the HCA compliance issues in easy-to-understand language and provides links to the relevant Massachusetts law. It describes the process Lincoln has followed to get to this point and spells out the future timelines. It also raises questions that the HCA Working Group may need further study to answer.

At the State of the Town meeting on September 30, the Working Group gave a polished and convincing description of Option C that concentrated all development near Lincoln Station. Since then, I have thought more about the impact of hundreds of new units at this small, busy area. Many others have raised critical questions about this option and the HCAWG has responded by adding three new options (D1, D2, and D3).

This new effort by the Lincoln Residents for Alternative Housing further expands the options available to meet compliance. Discussion and debate are at the heart of the “Lincoln Way” and we benefit by the skills and dedication of volunteers.

I urge everyone in Lincoln to study this new website, review the HCAWG information, and register here to attend one of the HCA meetings offered on November 8 at 8 a.m. in person or 7 p.m. virtually.

---

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.