The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

My Turn

My Turn: Vote no on the “bluntest instrument” for HCA compliance

By Randy Harrison

I am planning to vote no (for now) on Option C. Here’s why.

The Housing Choice Act (HCA) has given us a unique generational challenge and opportunity. At this point in the process, I’m hearing lots of winner-take-all, us-versus-them sentiments coming from all sides: “If you vote yes, you don’t care about Lincoln’s love of the environment and history of stewardship of the land” and “If you vote no, you are anti-development, anti-transit, and anti-diversity,” etc. Having lived in town for 30 years, raised our son, and gotten to know so many wonderful folks here, I’m hard-pressed to believe that either assumption is correct.

I originally thought that Option C might be the best solution, but with the information now at hand, the clarity I have personally sought has been elusive. Option C now appears to me to be the bluntest instrument to meet our HCA obligation. Even the Planning Board is split on this issue, which indicates that we still have work to do.

No matter what the outcome, don’t we and the generations that follow deserve to know that we have done everything we can to find a solution that embraces and unites the best of our community? This is where my “No (for now)” vote comes from and why I will be voting for Sarah Postlethwait for Planning Board.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: COA&HS board urges passage of community center measure

By Sally Kindleberger

We on the Board of Directors for the Council on Aging and Human Services ask you to vote for the Lincoln community center. The staff and volunteers at the COA&HS provide so many services across age groups, including exercise classes, lectures, help with taxes, housing, and debt relief. needed transportation, therapeutic groups as well as individual therapy, and much much more.

Beautiful Bemis Hall no longer meets the needs of the COA&HS community. Built in 1880 it is not in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990. Many of the spaces are cramped, windowless, and don’t offer needed privacy. There is no air conditioning on the second floor, which makes the room unbearable during summer months. And the pods on the school campus have long outlived their useful life.

Given thoughtful and careful scheduling, a new community center will provide dedicated spaces for LEAP, Parks and Recreation, and the COA&HS as well as shared spaces to be used by many other groups. The building will welcome families and help to forge intergenerational connections.

Please join us in supporting this necessary and exciting venture. A new community center will serve folk for generations to come and will be an amazing asset to our town. And please make a pledge that will reduce the cost of the building if you haven’t already done so.

Sally Kindleberger on behalf of the Council on Aging Board:

Dilla Tingley, chair
Laura Crosby, vice chair
Sally Kindleberger
Wendy Kusik, LICSW
Don Milan, JD
Terry Perlmutter
Jane O’Rourke, LICSW
Kathy Ramon
Donna Rizzo
Mark Sandman
Peter Von Mertens
Hope White

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Vote for Jennifer Glass for a third term on Select Board

Dear Lincoln neighbors,

We are writing to ask for your vote to reelect Jennifer Glass to the Select Board. We believe that Jennifer is one of the most effective Selects in the history of our town. She has significant experience on several Boards and Committees, serving as Chair of both the School Committee and the Select Board.

Jennifer will continue to bring to the Select Board:

  • Extensive experience as a town leader with a record of effective action
  • Broad knowledge of Lincoln, our values, our needs, and how to move forward
  • Keen intelligence, ability to research, analyze, and solve complex issues
  • Awareness of the value of contributions of residents and town staff
  • Understanding of the regional issues that affect Lincoln through her participation with the Metropolitan Area Planning Council and the Massachusetts Municipal Association
  • Proven ability to solve problems and find solutions.

Jennifer has constantly shown her dedication, thoroughness, and professionalism in her work as a town official. Beginning with a study on classroom size in 2007, moving on to the School Committee, and then to the Select Board, she has been an outstanding leader. As a member and then chair of the School Committee, she assisted in securing state aid to fund 40% of the 2012 school project. When the town voted not to go forward with that project, Jennifer worked assiduously for five years to bring the town together to agree on a new project. Then, as the the Select Board’s member of the School Committee Building Committee, Jennifer worked tirelessly to keep the project on time and on budget, and led the Property Tax Study Committee to explore new options to mitigate property taxes.

While she was serving as a Select, she also served on the Water Commission; helped found the Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, and Antiracism Committee (IDEA), and led the Housing Choice Act Working Group. To facilitate further communication with residents, she instituted a regular “Ask a Select Board member” drop-in sessions held around town. She is editor in chief of the Select Board newsletter. Through her 17 years of leadership and commitment on these boards and committees, she has developed an extraordinary understanding of the town and a proven ability to get things done.

A vote for Jennifer is a vote for:

  • Effective leadership
  • Wisdom and experience in action
  • Commitment to Lincoln’s wellbeing

We support Jennifer Glass for Select. Please join us — vote for Jennifer.

Abigail Adams
Sarah Andrysiak
Chris Andrysiak
Dea Angiolillo
Jacqueline Apsler
Robert Apsler
Lisa Baer
William Barclay
Ken Bassett
Alex Benik
Laura Berland
Becky Bermont
Sarah Bishop
Cathy Bitter
Hans Bitter
Paul Blanchfield
Rebecca Blanchfield
Pam Boardman
John Bordiuk
Rory Bordiuk
Janet Boynton
Stephen Brand
Julie Brogan
Gus Browne
Kim Buell
Larry Buell
Sarah Cairns-Smith
Annie Calhoun
Karen Carlson
Tom Casey
Ted Chan
Alex Chatfield
Lindsay Clemens
Buzz Constable
Elizabeth Creighton
Sandy Creighton
Tom Christenfeld
Doug Crosby
Laura Crosby
Priscilla Damon
Rosamond DeLori
Moha Desai
Penny DeNormandie
Tom DeNormandie
Jona Donaldson
Brianna Doo
Rachel Drew
Jeff Eaton
Andy Falender
Becca Fasciano
Jon Ferris
Kristen Ferris
Lorraine Fiore
Nancy Fleming
Jim Fleming
Amy Funkenstein
Asli Grace
Matt Grace
Rob Graves
Jennie Morris Grundy
Gina Halsted
Emily Haslett
Tom Haslett
Alan Hein
Jim Henderson
Nancy Henderson
Ruth Ann Hendrickson
Lis Herbert
Zach Herbert
Shira Horwitz
Ken Hurd
Pam Hurd
Brian Jalet
Kimberly Jalet
Steve Johnson
Jon Kelman
Joan Kimball
John Kimball
Chris Klem
Sue Klem
Steve Kropper
Stephen Kutenplon
Judith Lawler
Patrick Lawler
Barbara Leggat
Jackie Lenth
Dave Levington
Mollye Lockwood
Todd Lockwood
Mary Helen Lorenz
Sara Lupkas
Scott Lupkas
Rachel Mason
Lucy Maulsby
Chris McCarthy
John Mendelson
Kenny Mitchell
Tara Mitchell
Richard Mollica
Staci Montori
Buffer Morgan
Terri Morgan
Rachel Neurath
Craig Nicholson
Katie Nicholson
John Nolan
Trisha O’Hagan
Jane O’Rourke
David Onigman
Katherine Hall Page
Candace Pearson
Terry Perlmutter
Christopher Plonski
Dana Robbat
Joe Robbat
Stuart Rose
Travis Roland
Allen Rossiter
Selina Rossiter
Joanna Schmergel
Lucy Sachs
Jena Salon
Kathleen Shepard
Ray Shepard
Andrew Singer
Ellen Meyer Shorb
Paul Shorb
Barbara Slayter
Vicky Slingerland
Stephanie Smart
Tucker Smith
Jonathan Soo
Kara Soo
Nancy Soulette
Mary Stechshulte
Bill Stason
Susan Stason
Scott Steward
MingVi Steward
Susan Hand Taylor
Dilla Tingley
Margie Toph
Allen Vander Meulen
Peter Von Mertens
Katy Walker
Tom Walker
Heidi Webb
Ben Wells
Jean Welsh
Bryce Wolf
Bob Wolf
Krystal Wood
Louis Zipes
Tanya Zipes
 

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Vote “yes” on HCA zoning and “no” on community center

By Ken Hurd

With apologies to all those who have worked to bring a new community center to Lincoln, I once again feel compelled to voice my strongly held opinion as an architect concerned with what we build in Lincoln, and I want to remind everyone why I and so many others believe we should not build a community center on the school campus. I still believe the Council on Aging component should be located in Lincoln Station and let the LEAP and the Recreation Department be located at the school.  

First and foremost, I believe that a $25 million investment by the town should be deployed where it would have the greatest positive impact — namely in the Lincoln Station area. For nearly 14 years since Town Meeting approved the Comprehensive Long-Range Plan, in which the revitalization of Lincoln Station was overwhelmingly one of the highest priorities, the area has lain dormant and in serious need of a catalyst to jumpstart its transformation into the compact, vital, walkable village center that was a stated goal at the time. Unless Lincoln is proactive in embracing change, the area will continue to decline.

Equally important, I believe that many of the decisions and commitments that led to the current community center proposal were well-intended but somewhat myopic, and to make matters worse, they now predate the new realities of post-pandemic life in the 21st century. Chief among these is our increased awareness of the effects of climate change as warmer winters, hotter summers, and earlier springs dominate our lived experience, suggesting that anything we can do to minimize our dependence on the automobile should be a very high priority.

I also never bought into the idea that mixing octogenarian driving skills with children on a playing field was anything but an accident waiting to happen. And in the new age of the AR-15, I would remind everyone that school shooting incidents in the U.S. have skyrocketed since 2015. In 2023 alone, there were 198 shooting incidents at K-12 schools, six of which involved active shooters. Of course, everyone believes it won’t happen here, just as everyone believed it wouldn’t happen when and where the shootings did occur. Why we would even consider locating an adult facility on a school campus in such an era of random and unpredictable violence is beyond me.

From a planning standpoint, the economic disruption caused by the pandemic combined with the dramatic increase in wealth inequality over the last decade has put increased pressure on the need for more housing in the region. For economic reasons, many seniors who might want to downsize are somewhat locked into staying in their larger homes until there are reasonable housing alternatives from which to choose. Thanks to the HCA, we are bound to see at least some increase in housing in the Lincoln Station area, and most professional planners I know would consider this a golden opportunity to locate the COA in the middle of such a potential concentration of housing. Doing so would not only create a symbiotic relationship among the multiple uses desired, but also between the primary users and the facility should the right mix and size of units be offered.  

Lastly, we learned at the recent informational session on March 7 that the current proposed zoning regulations for the HCA overlay district contain no language that would prohibit such a use. We also learned that the RLF has never been asked by the town if they would be amenable to incorporating the needed COA spaces into any development they do.

Frankly, if the COA component of the community center were incorporated in the RLF’s plan for redevelopment, it would represent a plus to any potential developer’s pro forma — namely, to have a confirmed tenant for an active community use in a purposely designed ground-level space. This strategy would minimize the cost to Lincoln in upfront financing for design and construction, and it would replace public project inefficiencies with professional development expertise. Doing so may make the new community center facility far more affordable to the town’s already stressed taxpayers. 

So, my hope is that voters will vote YES for Article 3 and vote NO on Article 4.That way, I believe it opens a door for the RLF and the town to work together on an overall masterplan that addresses many of these larger issues in a much more holistic fashion, ultimately helping to transform Lincoln Station to its full potential as a truly vital, walkable village center. Remember, we humans shape our environments at a moment in time, and then they shape us for decades to come.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: An explanation of the ballot vote on community center

By Lynne Smith

At Town Meeting on March 23, the Community Center Building Committee will present slides illustrating a new building proposed to house the Council on Aging & Human Services, the Parks and Recreation Department, and the LEAP after-school program. While the renderings of any new building are always exciting to preview, I caution you not to get too excited. 

At $24 million, the building is expensive. I recently received my paper ballot and looked at the March 25 election question we will vote on if the community center vote passes at Town Meeting. Here is what it says:

Question 1:

Shall the Town of Lincoln be allowed to exempt from the provisions of Proposition Two-and-One-half, so-called, the amounts required to pay for the bonds issued for the purpose of paying the costs of designing, renovating, rebuilding, constructing, equipping, and furnishing a new Community Center to be located in the Hartwell Complex of the Ballfield Road school campus, Lincoln MA, including payment of costs incidental or related thereto?

Yes___      No____

The language baffled me: it did not mention the $24 million cost and it seemed to suggest a tax increase was somehow “exempt”! 

As I read the warrant prepared for Town Meeting by the Finance Committee and discussed it with my husband, we came up with this explanation:

  • Proposition 2½ limits the amount our tax levy can increase each year (2.5%) without requiring an override with a supermajority of voters.
  • But the law provides for so-called “exclusions” for capital or debt to allow residents to vote for one-time projects that are outside (above and beyond) of the Prop 2½ levy limit. 
  • Those exclusions require a supermajority vote at Town Meeting (March 23), as well as a simple majority at the ballot box (March 25).

So residents voting yes on this ballot measure are permitting a one-time exemption (exclusion) from the 2.5% annual levy limit increase imposed by Prop 2½. The fact is, this one-time exclusion will result in taxes over the next 30 or so years during which the bond is repaid. The $94 million school was also a one-time exclusion. We aren’t calling it an override even though it will increase our taxes and draw down our stabilization fund. Instead, it is an exclusion.

But wait, there’s more!

To minimize a residential tax increase for the community center, the Finance Committee recommends using $2 million of tree cash that would otherwise go to our stabilization fund plus $4.75 million from the current stabilization fund balance (see the bottom of page 2 of the warrant book.)

In total, $6.75 million from saved taxes will be used to fund the community center. The stabilization fund is used for unplanned but necessary expenses and the so-called free cash comes from the 2.5% tax increase that Lincoln residents pay every year, whether or not the budget requires it. We are paying it forward! Despite raiding both the free cash and stabilization funds, the cost of the debt for a new community center building will increase our taxes substantially.

While I appreciate the efforts of the Finance Committee to fund all the projects we ask for, I am definitely voting no at Town Meeting and on the paper ballot on March 25. I would rather use our stabilization fund to adapt existing buildings for new uses, not demolish serviceable ones.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: “No for now” will lead to “yes together”

By Lynne Smith

Many people in town are aware of the emotions around the Housing Choice Act proposed zoning amendment. These emotions are a testament to the fierce love we have for Lincoln. We cherish its past, appreciate its current beauty, and imagine a rejuvenating future that builds on our values. People on both sides of the issue share these feelings but disagree over the path.

We all want to:

  1. Comply with the HCA
  2. Add new multifamily units at lower prices than existing housing
  3. Protect retail business and parking at the mall
  4. Minimize environmental impact and preserve green space
  5. Continue Lincoln’s practice of 15%+ affordable housing
  6. Recognize Lincoln’s past success in developing 800 multifamily units (40% of our existing housing)

I believe we all want to be thoughtful and thorough about this momentous decision.

One of the main issues that deserves further discussion is this: A yes vote at Town Meeting would permit 100 units of housing* to be built at the Lincoln Mall. The Rural Land Foundation, owner of the mall, has shown a preliminary plan with 40 units, but has stated that allowing only 40 units is “not economically viable.” Where would the additional 60 units be built? Unfortunately, due to the finite space available at the mall, the likely outcome would be the replacement of retail space with housing units — the demise of Lincoln’s retail center.

We are fortunate to have Lincoln resident Ben Shiller, an economics professor, engaged with this issue. He has created a video that explains the problems with large-scale development of the mall and you can watch it here.

Ben Shiller is part of a data-driven grassroots organization that has been analyzing the HCA rezoning since last September. This group has coalesced as the Lincoln Residents for Housing Alternatives, LRHA, which corrected flaws in the initial zoning proposed by the Planning Board. LRHA has put together an informative website that describes and illustrates HCA issues. You can review it here before making a final decision.

I’m voting no for now to get to yes together! We should pause before taking the irreversible step of voting yes on Article 3 at Town Meeting on March 23. It will pass if only a simple majority of voters who attend the Town Meeting in person vote in favor. This could leave much of the town deeply dissatisfied with the result as well as with the process for the development of the proposed zoning, which was rushed through ahead of the legally permitted timeline without adequate time for public input to be received and incorporated.

Lincoln has until December 2024 to submit the HCA proposal. With a nine-month runway, a collaborative working group could craft a proposal that would pass with a substantial majority. An ideal plan would allow representatives from the LRHA and from a working group appointed by the Select Board to sit down together, analyze the data, iron out differences, and create a better choice with more public input. Much work has already been done and residents are more informed. A direct dialog with reasonable people on both sides could quickly lead to a consensus. I believe this group could arrive at a first draft by the end of May, revise and share it with residents over the summer months, and then present it in September, well before the state mandated deadline of December 31, 2024.

Members of the Planning Board and the Select Board have said we have time to get this right:

Jim Hutchinson, Select Board (March 7, 2024)

“If you like Option C, you should be comfortable voting for it, but if you don’t like it and want us to go in a different direction, we’ll get everyone back to the table and come up with a compromise to consider before year end.” 

Ephraim Flint and Lynn DeLisi, Planning Board (March 6, 2024):

“…we need more time to bring people together to discuss a compromise solution that most residents of town can agree on. This too could be done by forming a new subcommittee of the Planning Board to help obtain consensus between opposing views.”

Please join me in making sure that we take the necessary time to unite our town and to get the HCA Right. Vote “no for now.”

*Current proposal zones the mall’s four acres at 25 units per acre.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Vote yes for the community center on Saturday

By Rhonda Swain

Why should you vote in favor of the proposed new Community Center at Lincoln’s upcoming Town Meeting? We on the board of the Friends of the Lincoln Council on Aging (FLCOA) consider these to be compelling arguments in support of the proposal:

  • The community center will be available to everyone in Lincoln, from children to seniors. It will be a welcoming place to find community, whether you are a longtime resident or a newcomer to town.
  • The space envisioned for the community center has been designed specifically to meet the needs of the Council on Aging and Human Services (COA&HS), the Lincoln Extended-Day Activities Program (LEAP), and the Parks and Recreation Department. By providing a new facility, thoughtfully designed, we allow the staff of each of these organizations to do their best work.
  • In addition to providing programming and office space for the COA&HS, LEAP, and Parks and Rec, the community center will be a place for many other town organizations (Girl and Boy Scouts, Garden Club, Lincoln Family Association, etc.) to meet both formally and informally, affording opportunities for intergenerational activities that are much more difficult without a common meeting space.
  • Building a new community center to replace the pods that have served us well beyond their intended useful lives will complete the renovation of the school campus, which is a centerpiece of the life of the town, by adding a state-of-the-art, energy-efficient community center to our state- of-the-art school building. This investment would be in keeping with the environmentally conscious and future-oriented thinking that has been a hallmark of Lincoln throughout its history.

The board of the FLCOA has voted to show our commitment to the new community center by making a contribution. Over the past 40 years, generous donors have entrusted us with gifts and bequests which we have managed prudently. We feel fortunate now to be able to donate $1 million to the community center project. We will also continue to work with the community center funding group to raise additional private funds for the project.

Please join us in seizing this opportunity to build a community center that will be a source of pride for the town of Lincoln — not just for those of us here today who hope to enjoy it, but for generations to come.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Meet your Article 3 neighbors before you vote

By Barbara Peskin

(Editor’s note: this article was revised on March 19 to add words that were missing at the end of several sentences.)

Whether you are a No for Now, Heck Yeah, or Undecided for the pivotal rezoning vote on March 23 at Town Meeting, I hope you will make the effort to understand the implications of your vote by taking a walk around the 38 properties which would be rezoned under the proposed HCA zoning amendment, properties which include 190 residential homes. These properties are listed below. On your walk, note that each of these properties would be rezoned at a density of 8-25 units per acre.

Codman Road District properties (proposed new density: 10 units/acre):

  • Single-family: 168 Lincoln Rd, 34 Lewis St, 72 Codman Rd, 78 Codman Rd, 84 Codman Rd, 86 Codman Rd, 90 Codman Rd, 94 Codman Rd, 98 Codman Rd 104, Codman Rd, 108 Codman Rd.
  • Town-owned or business: DPW (30 Lewis St).

Lincoln Road/Lewis Street District properties (proposed new density: 11 units/acre):

  • Multi-family: 8 Ridge Road (4 units), 7 Ridge Road (3 units), 20/26 Lewis Street (3 units), 140 Lincoln Road/Ryan Estate (25 units).
  • Two-family: 1 & 3 Lewis Street, 5 & 7 Lewis Street, 14 & 16 Lewis Street, 22 Lewis Street, 154 Lincoln
  • Single-family: 136 Lincoln Road, 148 Lincoln Road, 150 Lincoln Road.
  • Town-owned or business: Joseph’s, Church, 152 Lincoln Road (real estate/dental office building), red 3-S building, Station Park, Food Project, Save-a-Tree, Clark Gallery building, 9 Lewis Street, 146A Lincoln Road.

Lincoln Woods District properties (proposed new density: 8 units/acre):

  • Multi-family: 40 apartments and 94 townhouses located at 1-95 Wells Road.

Village Center District properties (proposed new density: 25 units/acre):

  • Town-owned or business: Doherty’s, resident parking lot, the mall, commuter parking lot, two small town-owned lots adjacent to the railroad tracks.

Here’s why I am voting No for Now. We are close to a solution, but we need more time, and we have more time. The town will be able to comply with the HCA by the deadline of December 31, 2024.

Flaws in the proposed zoning bylaw
  • A three-family home can be eight times bigger than a one-family home on the same size lot. This can easily be fixed by scaling the footprint allowed for buildings with fewer units. Other towns have done this in their HCA bylaws (see image at right).

    An illustration of building massing under the current R1 zoning (top) and the proposed HCA zoning amendment (bottom). Click image to enlarge.

  • We need more green space and tree protection. Other towns include green space and tree protection in their bylaws. Design guidelines are not sufficient protection.
  • Proposed 15-foot setbacks on Lewis Street should be larger; Lewis Street has 11 homes and only one building set back as close as 15 feet. Why didn’t the Planning Board incorporate the input of Lewis Street residents on this?
  • Proposed setbacks on both sides of Lincoln Road (25 feet on one side and 15 feet on the other) mean we could lose the sun-filled tree lined heart of Lincoln. The current buildings are comfortably spaced from each other, and Lincoln Road does not feel crowded by buildings. Imagine 40+ units at the mall, set back only 25 feet from Lincoln Road, with the existing large trees removed or damaged from the new construction, opposite a large apartment building across the street, also set back only 15 feet from Lincoln Road. Note that 55 units could be built on the 5+ acres across Lincoln Road proposed for rezoning (including the St Joseph’s Church parcel and adjacent properties).
  • Concentrated development in our Village Center will increase the heat island in the center of our town.
  • Development of current single-family homes is likely to occur. Owners who want to stay in their homes may change their minds when multistory buildings rise up next door, and developers offer generous prices to purchase their property.
There is a chance to do better
  • Many more people are engaged in the process now than when the districts proposed for rezoning were selected by the Housing Choice Act Working Group appointed by the Select More minds, more hearts, more residents are now aware of the implications of the proposed rezoning and are seeking input to arrive at a better solution.
  • With the new state law, the mall can be rezoned to permit multifamily housing with a 50% vote outside of the requirements of the HCA. Lincoln could determine the appropriate density number, the percentage of units that would be affordable, and the amount of parking required for commercial uses. Such a rezoning would need a 50% vote, not a two-thirds vote. The RLF would have time to present a concept plan and explain the financial requirements for economic sustainability, and the town could engage with the RLF in a partnership which would be beneficial to all.
  • After testing out Option C with the Planning Board’s proposed bylaw amendment, residents are now better informed, and understand the importance of finding at least one other parcel outside of the Lincoln Station area to accomplish HCA compliance.

Please join me in voting No for Now, and then let’s unite Lincoln and work together for a better solution.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: How attractive is Lincoln’s village center to developers?

By Tom Walker

Setting aside the RLF mall, how financially attractive is developing multi-unit housing in Lincoln’s village center? This is an important question that keeps coming up and has been raised again most recently on LincolnTalk. Some research I did back in November to inform my own choice before the State of the Town meeting may add some useful information to the ongoing conversation.

In November, I reached out to a developer I know who’s been involved in small and large projects around Boston for many decades. My concern was that if Lincoln’s village center is financially very attractive to developers under the HCA, it probably would make sense to err on the side of constraining multi-unit housing development opportunities there (i.e., zone for fewer units). My research led me to a different conclusion.

It turned out that my developer contact, who knows Lincoln well, owns several buildings in neighboring towns similar to Lincoln that he is evaluating for development under HCA. He was kind enough to talk me through the detailed financial analysis for one of these buildings and his analysis provides useful insights into the likelihood of development for properties (in Lincoln’s village center. His potential project involves a relatively large building (>100 units) in a town that borders Lincoln. The building provides reasonable economies of scale and already has sewer and water connections, parking, and adequate stormwater controls.

For the Lincoln village center properties, by way of contrast, parcels would need to be assembled to achieve scale economies, sewage treatment is challenging, parking is constrained, stormwater infrastructure is problematic and facing increasingly stringent state regulations. All these issues would make development in Lincoln substantially more complex and expensive.

Even with the economic advantages afforded the multi-unit housing project in the neighboring town development of the project under HCA turns out not to be financially very attractive. This is due primarily to high construction costs — besides high material and labor costs, the developer pointed to other incidental costs, such builders’ insurance, that have risen dramatically in recent years. Affordability requirements imposed by towns add to the cost. High interest rates and a pullback by lenders have also created real barriers to development. The financial analysis ultimately indicates that a developer would be just about as well off leaving his or her money in the bank as investing in this HCA development project.

While this is just one example, it suggests that development in Lincoln’s village center may not be the path to riches for developers that is sometimes claimed. Yes, lower interest rates will improve the profitability of projects. But the remaining challenges of assembling parcels to achieve scale economies, solving the septic, parking and stormwater issues, addressing affordable housing requirements, and navigating the general complexity of Lincoln’s bylaw and design guidelines all make multi-unit housing in Lincoln’s village center expensive and probably less attractive than opportunities for larger developments in other towns in the region.

Given this state of affairs, my own conclusion back in December was that an option providing the largest number of opportunities (Option C) in the village center maximizes the likelihood that Lincoln gets at least some multi-unit housing, although I’m not at all convinced that the economics will result in much actual building. In the intervening months, I’ve seen no information, data, or analysis that changes my view.

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.

My Turn: Re-elect Gary Taylor to the Planning Board

Dear friends and neighbors,

We are asking for your support and your vote on Monday, March 25 for the reelection of Gary Taylor to the Planning Board.

Committed to forward thinking and planning, Gary Taylor brings significant town board experience and professional expertise to the Lincoln Planning Board. His skills in analysis and resolution of complex issues — as well as his positive approach and collaborative style — have helped Lincoln continue to be a place where we enjoy living and raising our children while upholding values that make us good neighbors in our region and in the world around us.

Gary’s public service to Lincoln has been substantial and lasting. He has proved that he can get things done. He has been instrumental in a wide range of positive changes in Lincoln in three terms on the Select Board, nine years on the Finance Committee, six years on the Planning Board, and leadership roles on the Lincoln Housing Commission and Affordable Housing Trust. Among the town’s accomplishments during his service:

  • Improved Planning Board approval procedures with capable planning staff, thereby moving the board away from micromanaging individual property plans
  • Adoption of the state’s most strict environmental building code
  • Creation of more than 100 new affordable homes that not only served our residents but also blocked housing developers from using state law 40B to ignore local zoning
  • Conservation of large, key open spaces to connect wildlife corridors and recreation
  • Development of The Commons in Lincoln senior living facility, with an affordable component, so older people who need support can remain in Lincoln or move near their children
  • Computerized the town’s accounting and integrated budgeting with the schools

Gary is not a one issue candidate. Future projects* need his skills in analysis and resolution of the many associated complex issues:

  • Responding to the state Housing Choice Act calling for denser “by right” housing near our commuter rail station and our small commercial center
  • The design and funding of a new community center
  • Proposed expansion of private jet services at Hanscom Field by MassPort
  • Preparing for crowds coming to Minuteman National Historic Park for our nation’s 250th Celebration and for proposed repaving of Rte. 2A
  • Planning for climate initiatives such as electric charging stations and solar arrays

Gary’s considerable professional training and experience add to his value on the Planning Board. With degrees in law and in finance and planning management, he has provided expert testimony in high-stakes energy-related litigation and is co-founder of an economic consulting firm that grew from two people to 400 with 14 offices in the U.S., Europe, China and Australia. He currently is a senior advisor to Massachusetts Sen. Mike Barrett on energy issues.

Abigail Adams
Sarah Andrysiak
Chris Andrysiak
Dea Angiolillo
Ken Bassett
Laura Berland
Sarah Bishop
Rebecca Blanchfield
Paul Blanchfield
Pam Boardman
John Bordiuk
Rory Bordiuk
Janet Boynton
Stephen Brand
David Briggs
Elaine Briggs
Julie Brogan
Erica Bronstein
Kim Buell
Larry Buell
Brian Burns
Karen Carlson
Ted Chan
Alex Chatfield
Deb Choate
Buzz Constable
Rosamand Delori
Alice DeNormandie
Penny DeNormandie
Tom DeNormandie
Jona Donaldson
Brianna Doo
Betsy Doorandish
Ramin Doorandish
Anne Doyle
Rachel Drew
Nataly Dvash
Jeff Eaton
Andy Falender
Jon Ferris
Kristen Ferris
Caroline Fiore
Mike Fiore
Nancy Fleming
Jim Fleming
Rainer Frost
Martha Frost
Amy Funkenstein
Andy Gnazzo
Mark Goeteman
Josh Grindley
Sandy Grindley
Gina Halsted
Tom Haslett
Emily Haslett
Alan Hein
Nancy Henderson
Jim Henderson
Ruth Ann Hendrickson
Lis Herbert
Zach Herbert
Ruth Hodges
Shira Horowitz
Sue Howland
Tony Howland
Chris Hug
Ken Hurd
Pam Hurd
Kimberly Jalet
Brian Jalet
Bryan Kelly
Elizabeth Kelly
Jon Kelman
Joan Kimball
John Kimball
Chris Klem
Sue Klem
John Koenig
Steve Kropper
Bob Kupperstein
Patrick Lawler
Judith Lawler
Jesse Lefkowitz
Barbara Leggat
Jackie Lenth
Karin Levy
David Levy
Paula Light
Jonathan Light
Rosemary Lloyd
Lew Lloyd
Mary Helen Lorenz
Sara Lupkas
Scott Lupkas
Rick Mandelkorn
Nancy Marshall
Peyton Marshall
Rachel Mason
Lucy Maulsby
Chris McCarthy
John Mendelson
Ellen Meyer Shorb
DJ Mitchell
Matt Mitchell
Richard Mollica
Staci Montori
Buffer Morgan
Terri Morgan
Jennie Morris Gundy
Patty Mostue
Brooks Mostue
Jayne Mundt
Rachel Neurath
Richard Nichols
John Nolan
Trisha O’Hagan
Barbara O’Neil
David O’Neil
Katherine Page
Eloise Patterson
Jeff Patterson
Lisa Paul
Terry Perlmutter
Ginger Reiner
Kurt Reiner
Dana Robbat
Joe Robbat
Cathy Rogers
Allen Rossiter
Selina Rossiter
Lucy Sachs
Surendra Shah
Kathleen Shepard
Ray Shepard
Paul Shorb
Barbara Slayter
Vicky Slingerland
Tucker Smith
Jonathan Soo
Kara Soo
Nancy Soulette
Sue Stason
Bill Stason
James Stock
Susan Taylor
Pam Thayer
David Urion
Allen Vander Meulan
Peter Von Mertens
Tom Walker
Katy Walker
Ben Wells
Jeani Welsh
Susan Welsh
Blandyna Williams
Fred Winchell
Claire Winchell Manning
Krystal Wood
Jen Zeis

“My Turn” is a forum for readers to offer their letters to the editor or views on any subject of interest to other Lincolnites. Submissions must be signed with the writer’s name and street address and sent via email to lincolnsquirrelnews@gmail.com. Items will be edited for punctuation, spelling, style, etc., and will be published at the discretion of the editor. Submissions containing personal attacks, errors of fact, or other inappropriate material will not be published.