• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to secondary sidebar

The Lincoln Squirrel – News, features and photos from Lincoln, Mass.

  • Home
  • About/Contact
  • Advertise
  • Legal Notices
    • Submitting legal notices
  • Lincoln Resources
    • Coming Up in Lincoln
    • Municipal Calendar
    • Lincoln Links
  • Merchandise
  • Subscriptions
    • My Account
    • Log In
    • Log Out
  • Lincoln Review
    • About the Lincoln Review
    • Issues
    • Submit your work

Planning Board votes 4-1 to approve Plaut proposal

May 1, 2025

The three lots owned by the Plauts are outlined in blue (click to enlarge).

The Planning Board voted 4-1 last week to approve a proposal to clear-cut and replant several acres of undeveloped land between Old Winter Street and Trapelo Road.

Representatives of Timothy and Madeleine Plaut, who own three lots totaling 8.5 acres, presented a proposal in March to clear about one-third of the land, regrade part of it for a driveway, plant new native trees and shrubs, and create a meadow in preparation for building a single-family house. The board specified that “to the extent possible,” construction and delivery vehicles must enter and leave the property from the Trapelo Road side of Old Winter Street and that the applicants build a temporary turnaround for that purpose. They had originally hoped to gain temporary access from Silver Hill Road, but the Conservation Commission denied that request since the route would traverse wetlands.

In their written decision, the board also required the applicant to mark every tree six inches or larger in diameter that they intend to cut down, and to have a site visit with Planning Department staff before tree removal begins.

At the board’s April 22 meeting, member Susan Hall Mygatt voted against the proposal, arguing that the clearing and replanting portions of the proposal do not conform to Section 17.7.4a of the town zoning bylaw that says that “the landscape shall be preserved in its natural state insofar as practicable by minimizing any grade changes and vegetation and soil removal.” The plan calls for cutting down 137 mature trees and planting 268 new trees of varying sizes as well as shrubs and ground cover. 

“It’s a question of what you consider the ‘natural state’,” board co-chair Gary Taylor said. “I would consider this to be preserving the natural environment of Lincoln.”

“I don’t think it meant it should be preserved as of the date that bylaw was enacted. I’m not an originalist; I think landscapes change,” Mygatt responded. “It’s going to be beautiful, but it’s just inconsistent with the bylaw.” Also, she added, “It’s such a huge project that while I believe [the Plauts] have the vision and financial capability to pull this off, if we’re wrong, it’s one heck of a mess on that property… I just think it’s an unnecessary risk to take.”

“If I’m an abutter, this is the next best thing to [having it be] conservation land. It’s better than three McMansions,” board member Rob Ahlert said — a sentiment that was echoed by two of those abutters.

Although the board approved the plan, they also agreed that the town needs more teeth in controlling what can be done to the landscape of private property. “I think we need to revise our bylaws and come up with something about taking down trees,” co-chair Lynn DeLisi said — something that the Tree Preservation Study Group is already working on.

But others at the meeting objected more strenuously. The intent of the zoning bylaw is to “preserve the current ecosystem,” said Barbara Peskin, who envisioned “children seeing wildlife running for their lives.

“I think this is an ecological disaster,” Vicky Diadiuk said. “Property rights are not as important as the welfare of the community. We’re talking about a common resource we’re about to devastate… it’s unworthy of the town of Lincoln. Stop studying and start passing laws that protect our environment. You’ll be gone by the time you finish talking about it.”

Category: Farrington/Nature Link project*, land use 3 Comments

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. bpeskin11@gmail.com says

    May 26, 2025 at 7:46 am

    The quote above about wildlife running is missing words and taken out of context, please see the full quote below.

    In my comments, I asked the Planning Board to uphold the Bylaw 17.7.4a “Preservation of Landscape, The landscape shall be preserved in its natural
    state insofar as practicable …”.

    A Planning Board member said the destruction of the forest is preservation (I can’t understand that reasoning but you can watch the video).

    One of the Planning Board members who supported the destruction of the forest thought the project had educational value and said to bring small children to see it in progress.

    In my comment, I hoped to remind Planning Board members, and even the applicant, that for the wildlife living in the forest now, this is not an educational excercise. I said, and these are quotes from the transcript of the meeting:
    ”
    “If you look at all of our bylaws and our open space plan, I believe that the intent is to preserve the current ecosystem. I think that’s why the bylaw is in there… And that’s why people voted for the bylaw .. to protect the ecosystem..”

    “And I read some suggestions of pushing off the cutting to when you won’t be leaving wildlife, orphans and wildlife in other ways. And I don’t mean to be dramatic, but I certainly wouldn’t want young children looking, observing the project and seeing the wildlife running for their lives.”

    Reply
  2. scottclary says

    September 1, 2025 at 4:19 pm

    Oh well; so much for our bylaws that our thoughtful predecessors originated and approved. Just another bad precedence set by our town leadership. Sleep well.

    Reply
  3. Vic says

    September 2, 2025 at 7:17 am

    “If I’m an abutter, this is the next best thing to [having it be] conservation land. It’s better than three McMansions,” board member Rob Ahlert said — a sentiment that was echoed by two of those abutters.

    Not too much bias from the board …..
    Is ‘McMansion’ the professional term we’re now using for those who can’t afford to build a house of their dreams?

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Upcoming Events

Mar 6 Fri
12:30 pm - 1:30 pm

What is Regenerative Farming?

Mar 9 Mon
7:00 pm - 10:00 pm

LOMA: High Maintenance Jug Band

Mar 13 Fri
12:30 pm - 1:30 pm

130 Years of the Boston Marathon

Mar 15 Sun
2:30 pm - 5:30 pm

Middle school hoops tourney

Mar 20 Fri
12:30 pm - 1:30 pm

Train Journeys of a Lifetime

View Calendar

Recent Posts

  • Water bills to go up by 13% March 5, 2026
  • News acorns March 5, 2026
  • Property sales in January 2026 March 4, 2026
  • My Turn: Unraveling the Hanscom misallocation March 3, 2026
  • Police log for Feb. 19–25, 2026 March 3, 2026

Squirrel Archives

Categories

Secondary Sidebar

Search the Squirrel:

Privacy policy

© Copyright 2026 The Lincoln Squirrel · All Rights Reserved.