Water Commission candidates discuss the issues

Terms on town boards and committees are usually staggered so new members join others who have more experience on that board, but this year, all three seats on the Water Commission are open due to two resignations and a normally expiring term. Three candidates are running for those seats (down from six residents who initially expressed interest):

1. Michelle Barnes was appointed as an interim member and is now running for a full three-year term.
2. Incumbent Ruth Ann Hendrickson (chair of the commission) is up for reelection and is running for a two-year term. She has previously said in a letter to the editor to the Squirrel that, if reelected, this will be her last term.
3. Jim Hutchinson is resigning from the Finance Committee a year before his term expires to run for a one-year term on the Water Commission.

Barnes and Selectman Jennifer Glass were both sworn in as emergency interim Water Commissioners in October after Bob Antia and Heather Ring resigned (in Ring’s case, because of dissatisfaction with management by Water Department Superintendent MaryBeth Wiser).

Below are Q&As and statements from the three candidates, lightly edited for length and clarity.

Michelle Barnes

South Great Road

Please tell us a bit about your background.

Most of my career I spent as a macrofinancial economist in the research department of the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston. Before that I was a tenured lecturer at the University of Adelaide teaching finance, international monetary economics, and macroeconomics. During graduate school, I worked as a consultant at both JP Morgan and the World Bank, and before going to graduate school, I managed Teamsters at Roadway Express in my hometown of Sacramento, Calif. I received my PhD in economics in 1998, and my last day on the job at the Fed was in December 2018.

I’ve lived in Lincoln since 2008, and feel super lucky to be able to fully enjoy Lincoln’s bucolic open spaces with my 10-year-old daughter and our border collie. During our time in Lincoln, I have had the opportunity and pleasure to serve on the Magic Garden board, the Lincoln METCO Coordinating Committee (as co-chair in 2015, secretary through 2019, and as president since then), and on the Lincoln Land Conservation Trust/Rural Land Foundation Board of Trustees (as chair since 2019).

Why are you running for the Water Commission?

I’ve chosen to run for Water Commissioner to continue the efforts our team has made since October 2019 to stabilize the Lincoln Water Department (LWD). I believe that at this important juncture, continuity, stability, and a strong measure of critical and analytical thinking are required to further stabilize the LWD and bring it to the point where it is successfully delivering safe and reliable water in a fiscally prudent and sustainable manner. Due to my recent tenure as a Water Commissioner and my background as a macrofinancial economist, I bring both attributes to the table.

Back in October 2019, when there was a call for the need to fill two Water Commissioner vacancies, I heeded that call (as did Jennifer Glass and Jim Hutchinson, who have been members of our team since then as well). I have thoroughly enjoyed climbing the steep learning curve of overseeing the Water Department’s operating and long-term planning process, getting to know all of the people involved in this organization and process, and being able to use my background in macro-financial policy analysis to help frame some of our debates about LWD fiscal management and long-term capital planning

In your opinion, what are the biggest problems or decisions facing the Water Commission, and how do you propose to tackle them?

The biggest problems facing the Water Department are personnel issues, chronic underinvestment in maintenance and infrastructure, and the long-standing leadership culture that brought the LWD to this critical point. It bears emphasizing, however, that I believe that a certain amount of continuity and stability in leadership are integral to moving the LWD forward in the most constructive possible way; the role of institutional knowledge in solving the LWD’s problems should not be underestimated.

I have confidence in the ability of the chair of the Water Commissioners, in conjunction with the team that has been assembled, to address and solve the critical issues facing the LWD for the benefit of the town and its water customers.  More personally, I am committed to facing head-on the multiple challenges I outlined above with candor, curiosity, clarity of vision, and a critical mind, and in a manner that simultaneously celebrates and preserves our positive contributions while having the courage to mitigate and reshape efforts that I believe are a detriment to the LWD’s mission.

Why should Lincolnites vote for you?

Lincoln voters should vote for me because I am deeply committed to ensuring the delivery of safe and reliable drinking water to the Town of Lincoln in a manner that is financially prudent and fair, both in the short- and long-term. Given my recent tenure on the Water Commission, I have been able to come up to speed in the areas that matter most for ensuring the current and future safety and stability of water treatment and delivery in Lincoln.  My skills as a macrofinancial economist focused for much of my career on policy analysis can continue to help the LWD chart a clear path to a more financially sustainable future.

Ruth Ann Hendrickson

Concord Road

Please tell us a bit about your background.

I’ve lived in Lincoln since 1967. While I was home raising my children, I served as president of the Recycling Committee for several years in the 1970s and as the Lincoln’s representative to the Regional Solid Waste Committee for several years after that. I was on the board of the Lincoln League of Women Voters, which was very active in town issues as well as state and national issues. I served as president for two years and vice president for several years.

I chaired studies on whether the town assessors were undervaluing older houses and on the per-pupil cost of our public schools, the latter leading me to run for School Committee, where I pushed for consolidation of all the grades into the Smith-Brooks complex. I also led the move to close the town’s polluting open dump and create the current transfer station. I went back to work in 1989 and retired in 2009.

In 2011, I ran for Water Commissioner after looking for a way to serve the town that would utilize my technical background and allow me to promote water conservation. For the past few years I have also served as the liaison to the School Building Committee (SBC), promoting both water and energy conservation. I recently withdrew from the SBC due to the demands on my time from chairing the Water Commission.

As I said in my letter to the editor, given the recent changes in Water Superintendent and Commissioners, I believe my continuing on the commission for another two years would lend a needed continuity. Moreover, since I am retired, I can devote a substantial amount of time to gathering and analyzing data to ensure knowledge-based decision-making. I bring to the position communication and creative problem-solving skills honed by my years in industry and an aptitude for electromechanical systems developed during my work on advanced gyroscopes and vacuum robotic systems.

In your opinion, what are the biggest problems or decisions facing the Water Commission, and how do you propose to tackle them?

Going forward, the issues are:

• Successfully completing the projects needed to upgrade the water system infrastructure
• Developing both short-term and long-term financial plans
• Assessing whether to continue with the existing upgraded treatment plant, to build in new treatment plant, or to sign up for MWRA water
• Attracting seasoned personnel to fully staff the Water Department

We are making significant progress on all four issues, especially in staffing, as we have hired a new and very experienced senior plant manager and several experienced part-time water operators, and we are about to add another full-time operator. We are in the midst of revamping our fee and rate structure to ensure we have the funds needed to provide clean, safe water. I’m confident that by the end of the next two years, the department will be back on an even keel with a solid plan for the future.

Jim Hutchinson

Stonehedge

Please tell us a bit about your background.

I hold a Ph.D. in computer science from MIT. Earlier in my career I developed novel machine learning and financial applications for supercomputers. I then co-founded a hedge fund with two partners, where as CEO I led the R&D for our quantitative, systematic trading strategies as well as managing all outside vendors and services for the firm, including legal, brokerage, fund administration, and hardware and software services. I am now retired.

My family and I have enjoyed living in Lincoln since 1999. I’ve always admired how so many good and capable residents have volunteered over the years to help keep our town running smoothly, and once I had the time I’ve tried to step up and do my part. I served as treasurer of Codman Community Farms from 2010–2013, and on the Finance Committee since March 2013, serving two years as chair and two years as vice chair. I’m resigning from FinCom as my seat has one more year on it. I’m not allowed to serve on FinCom and the Water Commission at the same time, and I feel like Water needs some attention.

While on FinCom, I’ve had the opportunity to act at times as liaison to various other groups including the Green Energy Committee, the Affordable Housing Trust, and most recently the Capital Planning Committee and the PPA Subcommittee, which is in charge of getting solar on our new school project. Since October 2019, I’ve also been invited to attend Water Commission meetings as an additional FinCom liaison.

Another relevant fact is that I own and maintain my own swimming pool, and am quite comfortable discussing water chemistry and sanitation. My setup is not as complex or sophisticated as our water treatment plant, of course, and I have plenty to learn if I am to become a Water Commissioner. But I find the water processes and equipment quite interesting and will be happy to dig in and learn more on the job.

In your opinion, what are the biggest problems or decisions facing the Water Commission, and how do you propose to tackle them?

The Water Department has been going through a very challenging period, with high staff turnover, difficulty hiring and retaining staff, and aging infrastructure to replace, all while trying to meet regulatory standards as the chemistry of Flint’s Pond changes over the years. Some of these challenges have already begun to be addressed starting last fall by a coalition of the Water Superintendent, town administration and finance staff, the elected and interim commissioners, and two liaisons from FinCom (including myself). However, much work remains to be done, including answering big-picture questions like whether the town would be better off switching to MWRA service.

Of course I don’t have all the answers to these questions yet. But in my opinion, the staffing issue is the most critical to resolve, for two reasons. First, the FY21 budget has risen sharply, in part due to the Water Department’s current need to engage outside consultants to get necessary tasks done. I’d like to see as much of the necessary work done in house as possible, since that would be more cost-effective.

Second, even if we decide to switch to MWRA, it will take years to do so, and in the interim we need to continue to operate our plant smoothly and safely. On the capital equipment issues, since October I have been advocating for deferring any capital investments that are not needed in the near term for safety or regulatory compliance reasons until we can make an informed decision about MWRA, although given the projects that have already been approved, it may be a foregone conclusion to stick with our own plant. In any case, I believe it is incumbent upon the Water Department and commission to make capital equipment decisions that get what value we can out of our existing investments and only replace or supplement that equipment when necessary to meet regulatory standards and provide clean drinking water to residents.

Why should Lincolnites vote for you?

I believe I have the management and team-building experience to help guide and oversee the staffing issues and rebuild a capable and stable team; the technical skills and interest to evaluate engineering trade-offs and make the correct capital equipment decisions; and the finance experience and orientation that will be needed to bring all of this together in a cost-effective manner.